Studying Health and Illness Experience using Linked Data (SHIELD): Empowering customers to donate shopping data for chronic pain research

Neo Poon, Claire Haworth, Elizabeth Dolan, A. Skatova
{"title":"Studying Health and Illness Experience using Linked Data (SHIELD): Empowering customers to donate shopping data for chronic pain research","authors":"Neo Poon, Claire Haworth, Elizabeth Dolan, A. Skatova","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v9i4.2420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & BackgroundChronic pain is considered a priority in healthcare and a threat to well-being across the globe, it is thus crucial to accurately measure the national levels of pain conditions and their impacts on workplace productivity and well-being.\nChronic pain has traditionally been studied in isolation with either self-reported survey data or standalone shopping records. The former are limited in scale and can be marred by response biases, while the latter lack ‘ground truths’: what research teams can measure are usually the purchase patterns of pain relief products, but neither the severity nor types of pain conditions.\nObjectives & ApproachData donation tools offer a novel approach to study chronic pain by linking the two aspects and establish statistical relationships between medicine consumptions and the multiple facets of pain experience. In a survey, we asked participants (N = 953) to share their loyalty card data with us, which is made possible with the data portability tool provided by Tesco (i.e., the largest supermarket chain in the United Kingdom) as part of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Based on questions adopted from popular inventories used in health research (e.g., EQ5D Health States, ONS4 Well-being, WEMWBS scales), we also asked participants to report the details of their pain conditions, hours of employment, and both general and mental health states. This allowed us to associate chronic pain - both subjective and objective (i.e., reflected by medicine consumption) - with its economic and personal consequences. Data collection was conducted via research panel providers, thus should approximate national representativeness.\nRelevance to Digital FootprintsThis work links digital footprints data donated by individuals to self-reported survey data, also develops an infrastructure for these data to be collected and safely stored.\nConclusions & ImplicationsOne key value of this project is to pioneer a measure of chronic pain that can be applied to transactional records that are much bigger in scale in future analytic works. Our research team has access to an array of different digital footprints data, including longitudinal transactional data provided by a major pharmacy chain (~20 million customers and ~429 million baskets). In order to utilise these data to associate them with regional workplace productivity measures and well-being data released by the Office for National Statistics, a metric must be defined to extract the prevalence of chronic pain from shopping data, which is informed by the patterns found by the data donation project.","PeriodicalId":507952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v9i4.2420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction & BackgroundChronic pain is considered a priority in healthcare and a threat to well-being across the globe, it is thus crucial to accurately measure the national levels of pain conditions and their impacts on workplace productivity and well-being. Chronic pain has traditionally been studied in isolation with either self-reported survey data or standalone shopping records. The former are limited in scale and can be marred by response biases, while the latter lack ‘ground truths’: what research teams can measure are usually the purchase patterns of pain relief products, but neither the severity nor types of pain conditions. Objectives & ApproachData donation tools offer a novel approach to study chronic pain by linking the two aspects and establish statistical relationships between medicine consumptions and the multiple facets of pain experience. In a survey, we asked participants (N = 953) to share their loyalty card data with us, which is made possible with the data portability tool provided by Tesco (i.e., the largest supermarket chain in the United Kingdom) as part of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Based on questions adopted from popular inventories used in health research (e.g., EQ5D Health States, ONS4 Well-being, WEMWBS scales), we also asked participants to report the details of their pain conditions, hours of employment, and both general and mental health states. This allowed us to associate chronic pain - both subjective and objective (i.e., reflected by medicine consumption) - with its economic and personal consequences. Data collection was conducted via research panel providers, thus should approximate national representativeness. Relevance to Digital FootprintsThis work links digital footprints data donated by individuals to self-reported survey data, also develops an infrastructure for these data to be collected and safely stored. Conclusions & ImplicationsOne key value of this project is to pioneer a measure of chronic pain that can be applied to transactional records that are much bigger in scale in future analytic works. Our research team has access to an array of different digital footprints data, including longitudinal transactional data provided by a major pharmacy chain (~20 million customers and ~429 million baskets). In order to utilise these data to associate them with regional workplace productivity measures and well-being data released by the Office for National Statistics, a metric must be defined to extract the prevalence of chronic pain from shopping data, which is informed by the patterns found by the data donation project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用关联数据研究健康与疾病体验(SHIELD):授权客户为慢性疼痛研究捐赠购物数据
导言与背景慢性疼痛被认为是医疗保健的重点,也是对全球福祉的威胁,因此准确测量全国疼痛状况及其对工作场所生产率和福祉的影响至关重要。前者的规模有限,而且可能会受到回答偏差的影响,而后者则缺乏 "基本事实":研究团队所能测量的通常是止痛产品的购买模式,而不是疼痛状况的严重程度或类型。目标与方法数据捐赠工具提供了一种研究慢性疼痛的新方法,它将这两个方面联系起来,并在药物消耗和疼痛体验的多个方面之间建立统计关系。在一项调查中,我们要求参与者(N = 953)与我们分享他们的会员卡数据,作为《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)的一部分,乐购(即英国最大的连锁超市)提供的数据可移植性工具使这一要求成为可能。根据健康研究中常用的调查问卷(如 EQ5D 健康状况、ONS4 健康状况、WEMWBS 量表)中的问题,我们还要求参与者报告其疼痛状况、工作时间以及一般和精神健康状况的详细信息。这使我们能够将慢性疼痛(包括主观和客观疼痛(即通过药物消耗量反映))与其经济和个人后果联系起来。与数字足迹的相关性这项工作将个人捐赠的数字足迹数据与自我报告的调查数据联系起来,还为这些数据的收集和安全存储开发了一种基础设施。结论与启示这个项目的一个重要价值是开创了一种慢性疼痛的测量方法,可以应用于未来分析工作中规模更大的交易记录。我们的研究团队可以访问一系列不同的数字足迹数据,包括一家大型连锁药店提供的纵向交易数据(约 2,000 万客户和约 4.29 亿个购物篮)。为了利用这些数据将其与国家统计局发布的地区工作场所生产率指标和幸福感数据联系起来,必须定义一个指标,以便从购物数据中提取慢性疼痛的患病率,而这正是数据捐赠项目所发现的模式所提供的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public sector health analytics capacity before and after Covid-19: A case study of manager perspectives in New Brunswick, Canada Data resource profile: Scottish Linked Pregnancy and Baby Dataset (SLiPBD) Global trends in prevalence of maternal overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of routinely collected data retrospective cohorts Maternal disability and newborn discharge to social services: a population-based study Generating synthetic identifiers to support development and evaluation of data linkage methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1