Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1002/bin.2034
Shannon Wilson, Catia Cividini‐Motta, Hannah MacNaul, Rebecca Salinas, Geninna Ferrer
{"title":"Preference for social stimuli: A comparison of stimulus modes used in preference assessments","authors":"Shannon Wilson, Catia Cividini‐Motta, Hannah MacNaul, Rebecca Salinas, Geninna Ferrer","doi":"10.1002/bin.2034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social stimuli are some of the most commonly used reinforcers. Previous research shows that preference for social stimuli can be identified using paired‐stimulus preference assessments (PSPA) employing various stimulus modes (e.g., pictures of the actual social stimuli). To date, no study has evaluated the correspondence in preference for social stimuli identified via PSPAs completed using three differing stimulus modes. Therefore, this study compared the correspondence in preference hierarchy identified via PSPAs completed using video of the social stimuli (VSM), pictures of the actual social stimuli (PSM‐A), and drawings of the social stimuli (PSM‐D) and whether preference hierarchy remained stable over repeated administration of the PSPAs (i.e., 1 month). Moreover, we assessed participants' preference for the three types of stimulus modes. Results demonstrated that during the initial PSPAs, preference hierarchies were most similar across the PSPAs completed using VSM and PSM‐A, that preference was most stable across repeated administration of the PSPAs completed using the VSM, and that participants' preference for differing stimulus modes was idiosyncratic. Moreover, the PSPAs completed using the VSM required the longest amount of time to create materials and administer the assessment.","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social stimuli are some of the most commonly used reinforcers. Previous research shows that preference for social stimuli can be identified using paired‐stimulus preference assessments (PSPA) employing various stimulus modes (e.g., pictures of the actual social stimuli). To date, no study has evaluated the correspondence in preference for social stimuli identified via PSPAs completed using three differing stimulus modes. Therefore, this study compared the correspondence in preference hierarchy identified via PSPAs completed using video of the social stimuli (VSM), pictures of the actual social stimuli (PSM‐A), and drawings of the social stimuli (PSM‐D) and whether preference hierarchy remained stable over repeated administration of the PSPAs (i.e., 1 month). Moreover, we assessed participants' preference for the three types of stimulus modes. Results demonstrated that during the initial PSPAs, preference hierarchies were most similar across the PSPAs completed using VSM and PSM‐A, that preference was most stable across repeated administration of the PSPAs completed using the VSM, and that participants' preference for differing stimulus modes was idiosyncratic. Moreover, the PSPAs completed using the VSM required the longest amount of time to create materials and administer the assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对社交刺激的偏好:偏好评估中使用的刺激模式比较
社交刺激是一些最常用的强化物。以往的研究表明,社交刺激偏好可以通过采用不同刺激模式(如实际社交刺激的图片)的配对刺激偏好评估(PSPA)来确定。迄今为止,还没有研究评估过通过使用三种不同刺激模式完成的配对刺激偏好评估所确定的社交刺激偏好的对应关系。因此,本研究比较了通过使用社交刺激的视频(VSM)、实际社交刺激的图片(PSM-A)和社交刺激的图画(PSM-D)完成的 PSPAs 所确定的偏好等级的对应关系,以及在重复施用 PSPAs(即 1 个月)后,偏好等级是否保持稳定。此外,我们还评估了参与者对三种刺激模式的偏好。结果表明,在最初的 PSPAs 中,使用 VSM 和 PSM-A 完成的 PSPAs 的偏好层次最为相似,使用 VSM 完成的 PSPAs 在重复施测中的偏好最为稳定,而受试者对不同刺激模式的偏好具有特异性。此外,使用 VSM 完成的 PSPAs 需要最长的时间来制作材料和实施评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating video feedback to improve eSports performance in Street Fighter V Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness Effects of an online group‐based intervention on effort tolerance in general education Further analysis of fixed‐lean approaches to reinforcement schedule thinning Token economies: Evidence‐based recommendations for practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1