Determining skills of basic schoolteachers in test item construction

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Education Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1002/rev3.3478
Kofi Nkonkonya Mpuangnan
{"title":"Determining skills of basic schoolteachers in test item construction","authors":"Kofi Nkonkonya Mpuangnan","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment practices play a crucial role in fostering student learning and guiding instructional decision‐making. The ability to construct effective test items is of utmost importance in evaluating student learning and shaping instructional strategies. This study aims to investigate the skills of Ghanaian basic schoolteachers in test item construction. The study focused on the revised Bloom's taxonomy. A cross‐sectional survey design was employed, and a questionnaire was developed and used to collect the needed data. The data were collected from 560 basic schoolteachers selected by using a simple random sampling technique. The participants comprised 280 male teachers and 280 female teachers. The data were collected and subjected to descriptive statistics analysis via mean, and standard deviation. While the p‐value (α ≤ 0.05) was used to determine the differences in the teachers' test item construction skills, the independence t‐test was used to compare the differences between the proficiency of  male and female participants. The analysis revealed a notable contrast in how participants perceived their abilities in constructing test items, indicating a statistically significant difference. Specifically, female teachers demonstrated a stronger proficiency in test item construction skills compared to their male counterparts. Also, most teachers prioritised the lower levels within Bloom's taxonomy while crafting test items. Regular in‐service training on test item construction was recommended at the district level for teachers to update and upgrade their skills.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment practices play a crucial role in fostering student learning and guiding instructional decision‐making. The ability to construct effective test items is of utmost importance in evaluating student learning and shaping instructional strategies. This study aims to investigate the skills of Ghanaian basic schoolteachers in test item construction. The study focused on the revised Bloom's taxonomy. A cross‐sectional survey design was employed, and a questionnaire was developed and used to collect the needed data. The data were collected from 560 basic schoolteachers selected by using a simple random sampling technique. The participants comprised 280 male teachers and 280 female teachers. The data were collected and subjected to descriptive statistics analysis via mean, and standard deviation. While the p‐value (α ≤ 0.05) was used to determine the differences in the teachers' test item construction skills, the independence t‐test was used to compare the differences between the proficiency of  male and female participants. The analysis revealed a notable contrast in how participants perceived their abilities in constructing test items, indicating a statistically significant difference. Specifically, female teachers demonstrated a stronger proficiency in test item construction skills compared to their male counterparts. Also, most teachers prioritised the lower levels within Bloom's taxonomy while crafting test items. Regular in‐service training on test item construction was recommended at the district level for teachers to update and upgrade their skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定基础学校教师编制测试题目的技能
评估实践在促进学生学习和指导教学决策方面发挥着至关重要的作用。构建有效测试题目的能力对于评价学生学习和制定教学策略至关重要。本研究旨在调查加纳基础学校教师构建测试题目的能力。研究重点是修订后的布鲁姆分类法。研究采用了横断面调查设计,并编制和使用了调查问卷来收集所需数据。通过简单随机抽样技术从 560 名基础学校教师中收集了数据。参与者包括 280 名男教师和 280 名女教师。收集到的数据通过平均值和标准差进行了描述性统计分析。用 p 值(α ≤ 0.05)来确定教师在测试项目构建技能方面的差异,用独立 t 检验来比较男女参与者的能力差异。分析表明,参与者对自己构建测试题目的能力的认识存在明显差异,这在统计学上具有显著意义。具体而言,女教师与男教师相比,在构建测试题目的技能方面表现出更强的能力。此外,大多数教师在编制测试题目时优先考虑布卢姆分类法中的低级层次。建议在地区层面为教师定期提供有关编制测试题目的在职培训,以更新和提高他们的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
The status of culturally relevant teacher education in the European context: A systematic review of research Effectiveness of language‐sensitive subject teaching: Heterogeneity and quality of the evidence and implications for future research Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method Research on teachers of colour and minoritised teachers in majoritarian education systems: A scoping review of the literature in the last two decades Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1