Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) to optimize the satellite‐derived discharge rating curves

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES River Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1002/rra.4325
A. Rai, Vikas Kumar, Sharad Patel, Zafar Beg, Kumar Gaurav
{"title":"Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) to optimize the satellite‐derived discharge rating curves","authors":"A. Rai, Vikas Kumar, Sharad Patel, Zafar Beg, Kumar Gaurav","doi":"10.1002/rra.4325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We estimate river discharge by utilizing limited in‐situ and multi‐satellite data through Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) optimization method (). We establish the BRMA by analyzing the functional relationships (H, W, H.W vs. Q) at four distinct locations along the Ganga (Shahzadpur and Azmabad) and the Narmada (Hoshangabad and Mandleshwer) rivers. To measure the channel width (W) we have used the Landsat 5, 7, and 8 images (2006–2019). We use the water level (H) data from satellite altimeter (Jason 2, Jason 3, Envisat, and Sentinel 3A). We have used BRMA to establish functional relationships between channel width (W), water level (H), and H.W to their corresponding discharge at each gauge stations in the study reach. Efficacy of the proposed approach is evaluated through a comparative analysis with the traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression method. We observed that the BRMA exhibits better performance as compared to the best fit curve obtained by using the OLS regression. We noticed that the functional relationship between the WH‐Q outperforms as compared to the other empirical curves at the both gauge stations of the Ganga River. The accuracy estimates of the Ganga River is in a range of (0.76–0.95), (1–23) and (0.25–0.44). In the Narmada River, the functional relationship between H‐Q outperforms. The accuracy of discharge at both the gauge stations of the Narmada River are found to be in a range (0.76–0.95), (1–23), to (0.25–0.44). This study is a step towards estimating discharge from satellites data.","PeriodicalId":21513,"journal":{"name":"River Research and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"River Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimate river discharge by utilizing limited in‐situ and multi‐satellite data through Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) optimization method (). We establish the BRMA by analyzing the functional relationships (H, W, H.W vs. Q) at four distinct locations along the Ganga (Shahzadpur and Azmabad) and the Narmada (Hoshangabad and Mandleshwer) rivers. To measure the channel width (W) we have used the Landsat 5, 7, and 8 images (2006–2019). We use the water level (H) data from satellite altimeter (Jason 2, Jason 3, Envisat, and Sentinel 3A). We have used BRMA to establish functional relationships between channel width (W), water level (H), and H.W to their corresponding discharge at each gauge stations in the study reach. Efficacy of the proposed approach is evaluated through a comparative analysis with the traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression method. We observed that the BRMA exhibits better performance as compared to the best fit curve obtained by using the OLS regression. We noticed that the functional relationship between the WH‐Q outperforms as compared to the other empirical curves at the both gauge stations of the Ganga River. The accuracy estimates of the Ganga River is in a range of (0.76–0.95), (1–23) and (0.25–0.44). In the Narmada River, the functional relationship between H‐Q outperforms. The accuracy of discharge at both the gauge stations of the Narmada River are found to be in a range (0.76–0.95), (1–23), to (0.25–0.44). This study is a step towards estimating discharge from satellites data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导式还原主轴 (BRMA),优化卫星得出的放电等级曲线
我们通过 Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) 优化方法(),利用有限的原位和多卫星数据估算河流排放量。我们通过分析恒河(Shahzadpur 和 Azmabad)和纳尔马达河(Hoshangabad 和 Mandleshwer)沿岸四个不同地点的功能关系(H、W、H.W vs. Q),建立了引导还原主轴优化法。为了测量河道宽度(W),我们使用了 Landsat 5、7 和 8 图像(2006-2019 年)。我们使用卫星测高仪(Jason 2、Jason 3、Envisat 和 Sentinel 3A)提供的水位(H)数据。我们利用 BRMA 建立了河道宽度(W)、水位(H)和 H.W 与研究河段各测水站相应排水量之间的函数关系。通过与传统的普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归法进行比较分析,评估了所建议方法的有效性。我们发现,与使用 OLS 回归法获得的最佳拟合曲线相比,BRMA 表现出更好的性能。我们注意到,在恒河的两个测站,WH-Q 之间的函数关系优于其他经验曲线。恒河的估计精度范围分别为 (0.76-0.95)、(1-23) 和 (0.25-0.44)。在纳尔马达河,H-Q 之间的函数关系优于 H-Q。纳尔马达河两个测量站的排水量精度范围分别为 (0.76-0.95)、(1-23) 到 (0.25-0.44)。这项研究为利用卫星数据估算排水量迈出了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
River Research and Applications
River Research and Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: River Research and Applications , previously published as Regulated Rivers: Research and Management (1987-2001), is an international journal dedicated to the promotion of basic and applied scientific research on rivers. The journal publishes original scientific and technical papers on biological, ecological, geomorphological, hydrological, engineering and geographical aspects related to rivers in both the developed and developing world. Papers showing how basic studies and new science can be of use in applied problems associated with river management, regulation and restoration are encouraged as is interdisciplinary research concerned directly or indirectly with river management problems.
期刊最新文献
Scenario Planning Management Actions to Restore Cold Water Stream Habitat: Comparing Mechanistic and Statistical Modeling Approaches Environmental Factors Associated With Fish Reproduction in Regulated Rivers Stream Restoration Effects on Habitat and Abundance of Native Cutthroat Trout Simulation‐Based Assessment of Fine Sediment Transport to Support River Restoration Measures Going to the archives: Combining palaeoecological and contemporary data to support river restoration appraisals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1