Technology adoption and management practices used in Canadian cow-calf herds

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Canadian Journal of Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1139/cjas-2023-0080
Madelena M. Lazurko, Nathan E. Erickson, John Campbell, Kathy A Larson, Cheryl Waldner
{"title":"Technology adoption and management practices used in Canadian cow-calf herds","authors":"Madelena M. Lazurko, Nathan E. Erickson, John Campbell, Kathy A Larson, Cheryl Waldner","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2023-0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian cow-calf producers are facing pressure to adopt management practices and technologies that help increase the economic and environmental sustainability, and public perception of beef production. Our aim was to describe technology adoption, management and record keeping practices in Canadian cow-calf herds, assess associations between herd attributes, productivity outcomes and adoption; and identify opportunities for improvement. Surveys from 131 Canadian cow-calf producers recruited through a national surveillance program were analyzed. Individual female records (80%) and feed testing (84%) were commonly reported as currently or occasionally used, followed by on-farm weigh scales (66%). Western herds were likely to utilize feed testing and nutritionists, ionophores and growth promoting implants, while eastern herds commonly used reproductive technologies. Large herds (>300 cows) were more likely to adopt technologies that aid in data capture (i.e., weigh scales) and follow recommended practices (i.e., feed testing). Paper was the main record keeping format. Production records were commonly utilized for culling and replacement heifer selection. Technology use has increased across the country compared to previous surveys and producers are implementing practices to help increase production efficiency. However, there is an opportunity to increase use of technologies that support individual animal and herd data to help inform ranch decisions.","PeriodicalId":9512,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2023-0080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canadian cow-calf producers are facing pressure to adopt management practices and technologies that help increase the economic and environmental sustainability, and public perception of beef production. Our aim was to describe technology adoption, management and record keeping practices in Canadian cow-calf herds, assess associations between herd attributes, productivity outcomes and adoption; and identify opportunities for improvement. Surveys from 131 Canadian cow-calf producers recruited through a national surveillance program were analyzed. Individual female records (80%) and feed testing (84%) were commonly reported as currently or occasionally used, followed by on-farm weigh scales (66%). Western herds were likely to utilize feed testing and nutritionists, ionophores and growth promoting implants, while eastern herds commonly used reproductive technologies. Large herds (>300 cows) were more likely to adopt technologies that aid in data capture (i.e., weigh scales) and follow recommended practices (i.e., feed testing). Paper was the main record keeping format. Production records were commonly utilized for culling and replacement heifer selection. Technology use has increased across the country compared to previous surveys and producers are implementing practices to help increase production efficiency. However, there is an opportunity to increase use of technologies that support individual animal and herd data to help inform ranch decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大牛群采用的技术和管理方法
加拿大的小牛生产者正面临着采用有助于提高经济和环境可持续性以及公众对牛肉生产看法的管理方法和技术的压力。我们的目标是描述加拿大牛群的技术采用、管理和记录方法,评估牛群属性、生产结果和采用之间的关联,并确定改进的机会。我们分析了通过国家监测计划招募的 131 位加拿大母牛生产者的调查。据报告,母牛个体记录(80%)和饲料检测(84%)是目前或偶尔使用的常用方法,其次是农场磅秤(66%)。西部牛群可能使用饲料检测和营养学家、离子探测器和促生长植入物,而东部牛群通常使用繁殖技术。大型牛群(大于 300 头奶牛)更有可能采用有助于数据采集的技术(如称重秤)和遵循推荐的实践(如饲料检测)。纸张是主要的记录保存格式。生产记录通常用于淘汰和替代母牛的选择。与以前的调查相比,全国各地的技术使用率都有所提高,生产者正在实施有助于提高生产效率的措施。然而,仍有机会增加对支持个体动物和牛群数据的技术的使用,以帮助牧场做出明智决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Canadian Journal of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1957, this quarterly journal contains new research on all aspects of animal agriculture and animal products, including breeding and genetics; cellular and molecular biology; growth and development; meat science; modelling animal systems; physiology and endocrinology; ruminant nutrition; non-ruminant nutrition; and welfare, behaviour, and management. It also publishes reviews, letters to the editor, abstracts of technical papers presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Animal Science, and occasionally conference proceedings.
期刊最新文献
Simulation of loading and unloading through ramps of different configuration: effects on the ease of handling and physiological response of pigs of two slaughter weights Comparative impact of conventional and alternative gut health management programs on plasma and tibia attributes in broiler chickens raised in commercial and research settings Characterization of First Cut Alfalfa and Grass Silage Management Practices on Canadian Dairy Farms A Review of Foot-Related Lameness in Feedlot Cattle Complete replacement of soybean meal with black soldier fly larvae meal in feeding program for broiler chickens from placement through to 49 days of age: impact on gastrointestinal, breast, skeletal, plasma, and litter attributes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1