Fifty years of Teikei: the evolution of the movement’s ten principles and its impact on alternative food initiatives in Japan

Chika Kondo, Simona Zollet, Mai Kobayashi, Nami Yamamoto
{"title":"Fifty years of Teikei: the evolution of the movement’s ten principles and its impact on alternative food initiatives in Japan","authors":"Chika Kondo, Simona Zollet, Mai Kobayashi, Nami Yamamoto","doi":"10.3389/fsufs.2024.1368253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan’s teikei movement, recognized as a source of inspiration for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) in Western countries, is now entering its fifth decade. Built upon trust and shared values, teikei has continued to rely on mutually supportive relationships between organic producers and consumers. The movement’s commitments were originally articulated through the ten principles of teikei, which offer a roadmap to create food systems based on solidarity principles going beyond market transactions. Despite a decline in numbers, teikei groups continue to operate in the midst of societal shifts that are altering food practices and consumption patterns. These changes have had an impact on the implementation of the ten principles and on the power dynamics between producers and consumers.This research investigates how such shifts have affected the development of alternative food systems in Japan, the evolution of teikei as a social movement, and the tensions that arise from contrasting notions of agri-food system alterity rooted in decommodified relationships versus market-based transactions. We employ the ten principles as a framework to investigate the transformations of some representative teikei groups over time, and identify three types of shifts: relational, operational, and ideological. These shifts show how different teikei actors have been engaging in realizing the vision of building sustainable agri-food systems through alternative market relations.The shifts also underscore the fluid and situated nature of agri-food system alterity within historical, geographical, and cultural relational spaces. The current variations of teikei configurations and the progressive diversification of approaches to address the challenges of upholding the original principles demonstrate the movement’s adaptability over time. However, they also demonstrate the necessity to strike a compromise between conflicting needs.The development of the teikei movement is not only important from an historical and geographically-situated perspective, but also as a dynamic and evolving experiment in the potential and challenges of active food citizenship. The democratic decision-making processes embedded within teikei principles and practices offer a valuable model for understanding how individuals enact their food citizenship and contribute to ongoing transformation of the agri-food system. Simultaneously, these shifts also serve as a warning against how democratic principles can be eroded by conventionalization and neoliberalization, and about the assumptions that arise during the process of building alternative agri-food systems, such as gendered labor.","PeriodicalId":504481,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","volume":" 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1368253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Japan’s teikei movement, recognized as a source of inspiration for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) in Western countries, is now entering its fifth decade. Built upon trust and shared values, teikei has continued to rely on mutually supportive relationships between organic producers and consumers. The movement’s commitments were originally articulated through the ten principles of teikei, which offer a roadmap to create food systems based on solidarity principles going beyond market transactions. Despite a decline in numbers, teikei groups continue to operate in the midst of societal shifts that are altering food practices and consumption patterns. These changes have had an impact on the implementation of the ten principles and on the power dynamics between producers and consumers.This research investigates how such shifts have affected the development of alternative food systems in Japan, the evolution of teikei as a social movement, and the tensions that arise from contrasting notions of agri-food system alterity rooted in decommodified relationships versus market-based transactions. We employ the ten principles as a framework to investigate the transformations of some representative teikei groups over time, and identify three types of shifts: relational, operational, and ideological. These shifts show how different teikei actors have been engaging in realizing the vision of building sustainable agri-food systems through alternative market relations.The shifts also underscore the fluid and situated nature of agri-food system alterity within historical, geographical, and cultural relational spaces. The current variations of teikei configurations and the progressive diversification of approaches to address the challenges of upholding the original principles demonstrate the movement’s adaptability over time. However, they also demonstrate the necessity to strike a compromise between conflicting needs.The development of the teikei movement is not only important from an historical and geographically-situated perspective, but also as a dynamic and evolving experiment in the potential and challenges of active food citizenship. The democratic decision-making processes embedded within teikei principles and practices offer a valuable model for understanding how individuals enact their food citizenship and contribute to ongoing transformation of the agri-food system. Simultaneously, these shifts also serve as a warning against how democratic principles can be eroded by conventionalization and neoliberalization, and about the assumptions that arise during the process of building alternative agri-food systems, such as gendered labor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teikei 五十年:该运动十项原则的演变及其对日本替代食品倡议的影响
日本的 Teikei 运动被认为是西方国家社区支持农业(CSA)的灵感源泉,现已进入第五个十年。Teikei 建立在信任和共同价值观的基础上,一直依靠有机生产者和消费者之间相互支持的关系。该运动的承诺最初是通过 Teikei 的十项原则阐明的,这些原则为创建基于团结原则的食品系统提供了超越市场交易的路线图。尽管 Teikei 团体的数量有所减少,但它们仍在社会变革中继续开展活动,而社会变革正在改变食品做法和消费模式。本研究调查了这些变化如何影响了日本替代性食品体系的发展、作为一种社会运动的 Teikei 的演变,以及植根于非商品化关系和基于市场交易的农业-食品体系改变性的对比概念所产生的紧张关系。我们以这十项原则为框架,研究了一些具有代表性的帝经团体随着时间推移而发生的转变,并确定了三种类型的转变:关系转变、运作转变和意识形态转变。这些转变显示了不同的帝经参与者是如何通过替代性市场关系来实现建立可持续农业食品体系的愿景的。这些转变还强调了农业食品体系在历史、地理和文化关系空间中的流动性和情景性。目前各种不同的 Teikei 配置以及为应对坚持最初原则所面临的挑战而采取的逐步多样化的方法,表明了该运动随着时间的推移而具有的适应性。Teikei 运动的发展不仅从历史和地理位置的角度来看非常重要,而且也是对积极的粮食公民权的潜力和挑战的动态和不断发展的实验。蕴含在膳食原则和实践中的民主决策过程提供了一个宝贵的模式,让我们了解个人如何行使其食品公民权,并为农业食品体系的持续转型做出贡献。同时,这些转变也是对民主原则如何被传统化和新自由主义化侵蚀的警示,以及对建立替代性农业食品体系过程中出现的假设(如性别化劳动)的警示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fish kills and insecticides: historical water quality patterns in 10 agricultural watersheds in Prince Edward Island, Canada (2002–2022) Bedding material properties and slurry C/N ratio affect the availability of nitrogen in cattle slurry applied to soil Editorial: Agrochemicals in agricultural and non-agricultural settings: fate, distribution, and potential human and environmental health hazards Analysis of the driving path of e-commerce to high-quality agricultural development in China: empirical evidence from mediating effect models Unravelling the synergistic effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and vermicompost on improving plant growth,nutrient absorption, and secondary metabolite production in ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1