Translocation prevents the extirpation of a threatened minnow during ongoing drought and nonnative species invasions

Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.3996/jfwm-23-009
S. Hedden, Matthew A. Rinker, Shaula J. Hedwall
{"title":"Translocation prevents the extirpation of a threatened minnow during ongoing drought and nonnative species invasions","authors":"S. Hedden, Matthew A. Rinker, Shaula J. Hedwall","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-23-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stream habitats and disturbance regimes are rapidly changing, leading to cascading effects on native and nonnative fish communities. Managers face the ongoing and daunting challenge of trying to maintain or recover native fish populations as habitat is dried or nonnative species invade. This reduction of suitable habitat has led to species distribution declines and an overall lack of success in many native fish management activities. Our study aimed at exploring the potential success in managing a heavily depleted native fish species by attempting to reestablish extirpated populations. We first examined how the distribution of a threatened minnow has declined from its historical to its contemporary range, then we examined if numerous translocation events during increasing pressures of nonnative invasions and ongoing multi- decadal drought could successfully expand their distribution. Lastly, we assessed if nonnative mechanical removals were effective in newly invaded streams. Little Colorado Spinedace Lepidomeda vittata distribution was reduced to only two remaining populations from the 1960s through the early 2000s. Translocations started in 2001 and despite the negative effects of drought and species invasions the efforts were largely successful (8 of 9 streams), likely because managers conducted multiple translocation events and targeted perennial reaches where nonnative aquatic predators were not present. When translocated streams were invaded by nonnative fish, multi-pass mechanical removal efforts proved to be highly effective (removal rates of invaded populations: 98.1-100%). We demonstrate that translocation and mechanical removal efforts in small streams can be a pivotal tool in managing native fish species even if sufficient habitat is scarce on the landscape; however, these efforts will likely require constant and long-term commitments to maintain species throughout their native ranges.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-23-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stream habitats and disturbance regimes are rapidly changing, leading to cascading effects on native and nonnative fish communities. Managers face the ongoing and daunting challenge of trying to maintain or recover native fish populations as habitat is dried or nonnative species invade. This reduction of suitable habitat has led to species distribution declines and an overall lack of success in many native fish management activities. Our study aimed at exploring the potential success in managing a heavily depleted native fish species by attempting to reestablish extirpated populations. We first examined how the distribution of a threatened minnow has declined from its historical to its contemporary range, then we examined if numerous translocation events during increasing pressures of nonnative invasions and ongoing multi- decadal drought could successfully expand their distribution. Lastly, we assessed if nonnative mechanical removals were effective in newly invaded streams. Little Colorado Spinedace Lepidomeda vittata distribution was reduced to only two remaining populations from the 1960s through the early 2000s. Translocations started in 2001 and despite the negative effects of drought and species invasions the efforts were largely successful (8 of 9 streams), likely because managers conducted multiple translocation events and targeted perennial reaches where nonnative aquatic predators were not present. When translocated streams were invaded by nonnative fish, multi-pass mechanical removal efforts proved to be highly effective (removal rates of invaded populations: 98.1-100%). We demonstrate that translocation and mechanical removal efforts in small streams can be a pivotal tool in managing native fish species even if sufficient habitat is scarce on the landscape; however, these efforts will likely require constant and long-term commitments to maintain species throughout their native ranges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
在持续干旱和非本地物种入侵的情况下,迁移防止了一种濒危小鱼的灭绝
溪流栖息地和干扰机制正在迅速发生变化,从而对本地和非本地鱼类群落产生连带影响。随着栖息地的干涸或非本地物种的入侵,管理者面临着如何维持或恢复本地鱼类种群的持续而艰巨的挑战。适宜栖息地的减少导致物种分布减少,许多本地鱼类管理活动总体上缺乏成功经验。我们的研究旨在通过尝试重建已灭绝的种群,探索管理一种严重枯竭的本地鱼类可能取得的成功。我们首先考察了一种濒危鱲鱼的分布如何从其历史分布区下降到当代分布区,然后考察了在非本地物种入侵和持续数十年干旱的压力不断增加的情况下,多次迁移活动能否成功扩大其分布区。最后,我们评估了在新入侵的溪流中,机械清除非本地物种是否有效。从 20 世纪 60 年代到 21 世纪初,科罗拉多小刺鱼 Lepidomeda vittata 的分布已减少到仅剩两个种群。迁移工作于 2001 年开始,尽管受到干旱和物种入侵的负面影响,但迁移工作在很大程度上取得了成功(9 条溪流中的 8 条),这可能是因为管理者进行了多次迁移活动,并将目标锁定在没有非本地水生捕食者的多年生河段。事实证明,当被转移的溪流受到非本地鱼类入侵时,多次机械清除工作非常有效(入侵种群清除率:98.1%-100%)。我们的研究表明,即使在缺乏足够栖息地的情况下,小溪流中的迁移和机械移除工作也可以成为管理本地鱼类物种的重要工具;然而,这些工作可能需要持续和长期的努力,才能在整个本地范围内维持物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1