A Systematic Review of Moderators of the Association between Dietary Restraint and Binge Eating

Obesities Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.3390/obesities4020013
Tyler B. Mason, Anna Dolgon-Krutolow, Kathryn E. Smith
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Moderators of the Association between Dietary Restraint and Binge Eating","authors":"Tyler B. Mason, Anna Dolgon-Krutolow, Kathryn E. Smith","doi":"10.3390/obesities4020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obesity interventions typically involve some form of dietary restraint (i.e., intentional limiting of food intake), yet the restraint model of binge eating proposes that engaging in dietary restraint is a causal factor for binge eating symptoms. Evidence for this model has been mixed and differs by measures, study design, and sample. Further, there also may be moderators of the association between dietary restraint and binge eating. The purpose of this systematic review was to compile the current evidence on moderators of the association between dietary restraint and binge eating. A literature search was conducted across electronic databases, resulting in the inclusion of 16 papers (with 15 different samples). The reviewed studies were primarily heterosexual White college student females and were primarily cross-sectional studies with self-report measures. There were no consistent moderators across the studies. However, there was some evidence for interactions between affective constructs and dietary restraint in relation to binge eating, as well as three-way interactions between affect, cognitive constructs, and dietary restraint. Although there were few studies, there was little current evidence for social, biological, and demographic factors as moderators. Overall, our systematic review shows a need for further research to clarify and validate the moderators, and to understand the complex interactions as well as the potential causal relationships between restraint and binge eating behaviors.","PeriodicalId":93598,"journal":{"name":"Obesities","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities4020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obesity interventions typically involve some form of dietary restraint (i.e., intentional limiting of food intake), yet the restraint model of binge eating proposes that engaging in dietary restraint is a causal factor for binge eating symptoms. Evidence for this model has been mixed and differs by measures, study design, and sample. Further, there also may be moderators of the association between dietary restraint and binge eating. The purpose of this systematic review was to compile the current evidence on moderators of the association between dietary restraint and binge eating. A literature search was conducted across electronic databases, resulting in the inclusion of 16 papers (with 15 different samples). The reviewed studies were primarily heterosexual White college student females and were primarily cross-sectional studies with self-report measures. There were no consistent moderators across the studies. However, there was some evidence for interactions between affective constructs and dietary restraint in relation to binge eating, as well as three-way interactions between affect, cognitive constructs, and dietary restraint. Although there were few studies, there was little current evidence for social, biological, and demographic factors as moderators. Overall, our systematic review shows a need for further research to clarify and validate the moderators, and to understand the complex interactions as well as the potential causal relationships between restraint and binge eating behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饮食限制与暴饮暴食之间关系的调节因素系统回顾
肥胖症干预措施通常涉及某种形式的饮食限制(即有意限制食物摄入量),然而,暴食限制模型提出,饮食限制是导致暴食症状的一个因果因素。该模式的证据不一,且因测量方法、研究设计和样本的不同而各异。此外,饮食节制与暴食之间的关系也可能存在调节因素。本系统性综述的目的是汇编饮食节制与暴食之间关联的调节因素的现有证据。我们在电子数据库中进行了文献检索,最终纳入了 16 篇论文(涉及 15 个不同样本)。所审查的研究对象主要是异性恋的白人女大学生,并且主要是采用自我报告测量方法的横断面研究。这些研究没有一致的调节因素。不过,有一些证据表明,在暴饮暴食方面,情感建构和饮食节制之间存在相互作用,情感、认知建构和饮食节制之间也存在三方相互作用。虽然研究很少,但目前几乎没有证据表明社会、生物和人口因素是调节因素。总之,我们的系统性综述表明,有必要开展进一步的研究,以澄清和验证调节因素,并了解克制与暴食行为之间复杂的相互作用和潜在的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of In-Person and Virtual Implementations of an Obesity Prevention Culinary Nutrition Education Program for Family Care Providers. Silymarin: A Natural Compound for Obesity Management Childhood and Adolescent Obesity in a School in Interior Portugal—A Teen without Risk Study Effectiveness of an Email-Based, Semaglutide-Supported Weight-Loss Service for People with Overweight and Obesity in Germany: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Analysis The Metabolic Syndrome: An Overview and Proposed Mechanisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1