A real-time hybrid simulation framework for reliability-based design optimization of structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4175
Changle Peng, Tong Guo, Cheng Chen, Weijie Xu
{"title":"A real-time hybrid simulation framework for reliability-based design optimization of structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions","authors":"Changle Peng,&nbsp;Tong Guo,&nbsp;Cheng Chen,&nbsp;Weijie Xu","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) traditionally relies primarily on high-fidelity and computationally expensive simulations to search for and evaluate design solutions. However, significant disparities could emerge for complex nonlinear behavior that are challenging for numerical modeling. In contrast to mitigating the impact of inaccurate numerical modeling through optimization algorithms, laboratory experiments realistically capture the complex nonlinear behavior of structures or their components. Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is widely considered as an efficient and cost-effective technique for integrating numerical modeling with experimental testing for structural response evaluation. This study proposes an innovative framework that utilizes RTHS for the performance assessment of candidate designs to enable RBDO of structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions. RTHS tests are conducted to physically evaluate structural responses through realistically replicating complex nonlinear behavior of experimental substructures. This study introduces a novel penalty function-based efficient global optimization (P-EGO) method to minimize the required number of laboratory tests through surrogating the response quantities of interest derived from RTHS. The proposed framework is experimentally evaluated for design optimization of a two-story four-bay steel moment-resisting frame with self-centering viscous dampers subjected to pulse-like ground motions. The results demonstrate innovative application of RTHS in dynamic optimal design to account for uncertainties. It offers an effective and efficient alternative for traditional RBDO through pure computational simulation, particularly when structural components pose challenges for numerical modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"53 10","pages":"3246-3262"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) traditionally relies primarily on high-fidelity and computationally expensive simulations to search for and evaluate design solutions. However, significant disparities could emerge for complex nonlinear behavior that are challenging for numerical modeling. In contrast to mitigating the impact of inaccurate numerical modeling through optimization algorithms, laboratory experiments realistically capture the complex nonlinear behavior of structures or their components. Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is widely considered as an efficient and cost-effective technique for integrating numerical modeling with experimental testing for structural response evaluation. This study proposes an innovative framework that utilizes RTHS for the performance assessment of candidate designs to enable RBDO of structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions. RTHS tests are conducted to physically evaluate structural responses through realistically replicating complex nonlinear behavior of experimental substructures. This study introduces a novel penalty function-based efficient global optimization (P-EGO) method to minimize the required number of laboratory tests through surrogating the response quantities of interest derived from RTHS. The proposed framework is experimentally evaluated for design optimization of a two-story four-bay steel moment-resisting frame with self-centering viscous dampers subjected to pulse-like ground motions. The results demonstrate innovative application of RTHS in dynamic optimal design to account for uncertainties. It offers an effective and efficient alternative for traditional RBDO through pure computational simulation, particularly when structural components pose challenges for numerical modeling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于可靠性的实时混合模拟框架,用于优化受脉冲地动影响的结构设计
基于可靠性的设计优化(RBDO)传统上主要依靠高保真和计算昂贵的模拟来搜索和评估设计方案。然而,对于复杂的非线性行为来说,数值建模具有挑战性,可能会出现明显的差异。与通过优化算法减轻不准确数值建模的影响相比,实验室实验可以真实地捕捉结构或其部件的复杂非线性行为。实时混合模拟(RTHS)被广泛认为是一种高效、经济的技术,可将数值建模与结构响应评估的实验测试相结合。本研究提出了一个创新框架,利用 RTHS 对候选设计进行性能评估,以实现承受脉冲地动的结构的 RBDO。RTHS 试验通过真实再现实验性子结构的复杂非线性行为,对结构响应进行物理评估。本研究引入了一种新颖的基于惩罚函数的高效全局优化(P-EGO)方法,通过代用 RTHS 得出的相关响应量,最大限度地减少所需的实验室测试次数。对所提出的框架进行了实验评估,该框架用于对带有自定心粘滞阻尼器的两层四榀钢制力矩抵抗框架进行设计优化,该框架承受脉冲地动。结果证明了 RTHS 在动态优化设计中的创新应用,以考虑不确定性。它为通过纯计算模拟的传统 RBDO 提供了一种有效和高效的替代方法,尤其是当结构部件对数值建模构成挑战时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information SSI-induced seismic earth pressures on an integral abutment bridge model: Experimental measurements versus numerical simulations and code provisions Estimation of inelastic displacement ratio spectrum for existing RC structures via displacement response spectrum Linear equivalence for motion amplification devices in earthquake engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1