The use of a surgical logbook to improve training and patient safety: A retrospective analysis of 6 years' experience in Bristol, UK

Q3 Medicine Skin health and disease Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1002/ski2.386
E. Wasson, Charankumal Thandi, Adam Bray
{"title":"The use of a surgical logbook to improve training and patient safety: A retrospective analysis of 6 years' experience in Bristol, UK","authors":"E. Wasson, Charankumal Thandi, Adam Bray","doi":"10.1002/ski2.386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logbooks can be a useful educational tool. Although their use in medical training has been greatly explored, there is limited research into their application throughout a clinician's career. We created a surgical logbook to allow clinicians to record their skin surgery procedures and reflect on the histological diagnosis and clearance margins achieved.We provide a retrospective analysis to evaluate the usefulness of the logbook as an analytical and educational tool in a dermatology department, particularly for maintaining exemplary complete excision rates.Data was collected from clinicians who conducted skin surgery in Bristol, UK. Cases were entered at the time of surgery, collecting data on body site, clinical margin, suspected diagnosis, type of procedure and closure. Following receipt of histological results, data on histological excision margins and tumour type was entered. Each clinician submitted data for a minimum of 3 months each year, and data collection ran from April 2012 until March 2018.Data from 5161 excision surgeries was collected over the 6‐year period. On histological diagnosis, excisions constituted 50% Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), 12% Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), 9% Malignant Melanoma (MM) and 1% Lentigo Maligna (LM), and 28% ‘Other’ (rarer malignancies, melanoma wide local excision scars and pre‐cancerous/benign lesions). The department was found to have good diagnostic concordance: BCC 92%, SCC 87%, MM 80% and LM 53%. Overall complete excision rate was high at 97.07%. The most successfully excised cancer was BCC (97.50%), then SCC (97.14%) MM (96.48%) and LM (95.23%). The department provided many complex surgeries including 8.3% flaps and 8.5% grafts. Average lesion diameter was 11 mm (range 2–90 mm). There was a significant improvement in excision rates seen over the years for BCC, MM and LM. Although there was no significant difference found for SCC, this group began the study with already high clearance rates.This surgical logbook supports improved training and continues professional development. We encourage more departments to use this logbook and share the data that they produce. This could improve their excision rates, patient experience, and save them up to £28 000 per year.","PeriodicalId":74804,"journal":{"name":"Skin health and disease","volume":"2 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Logbooks can be a useful educational tool. Although their use in medical training has been greatly explored, there is limited research into their application throughout a clinician's career. We created a surgical logbook to allow clinicians to record their skin surgery procedures and reflect on the histological diagnosis and clearance margins achieved.We provide a retrospective analysis to evaluate the usefulness of the logbook as an analytical and educational tool in a dermatology department, particularly for maintaining exemplary complete excision rates.Data was collected from clinicians who conducted skin surgery in Bristol, UK. Cases were entered at the time of surgery, collecting data on body site, clinical margin, suspected diagnosis, type of procedure and closure. Following receipt of histological results, data on histological excision margins and tumour type was entered. Each clinician submitted data for a minimum of 3 months each year, and data collection ran from April 2012 until March 2018.Data from 5161 excision surgeries was collected over the 6‐year period. On histological diagnosis, excisions constituted 50% Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), 12% Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), 9% Malignant Melanoma (MM) and 1% Lentigo Maligna (LM), and 28% ‘Other’ (rarer malignancies, melanoma wide local excision scars and pre‐cancerous/benign lesions). The department was found to have good diagnostic concordance: BCC 92%, SCC 87%, MM 80% and LM 53%. Overall complete excision rate was high at 97.07%. The most successfully excised cancer was BCC (97.50%), then SCC (97.14%) MM (96.48%) and LM (95.23%). The department provided many complex surgeries including 8.3% flaps and 8.5% grafts. Average lesion diameter was 11 mm (range 2–90 mm). There was a significant improvement in excision rates seen over the years for BCC, MM and LM. Although there was no significant difference found for SCC, this group began the study with already high clearance rates.This surgical logbook supports improved training and continues professional development. We encourage more departments to use this logbook and share the data that they produce. This could improve their excision rates, patient experience, and save them up to £28 000 per year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用手术日志改善培训和患者安全:英国布里斯托尔 6 年经验的回顾性分析
日志是一种有用的教育工具。虽然在医学培训中对日志的应用进行了大量探索,但对其在临床医生职业生涯中的应用研究却十分有限。我们创建了一个手术日志,让临床医生记录他们的皮肤手术过程,并对组织学诊断和达到的切除边缘进行反思。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估日志作为分析和教育工具在皮肤科的实用性,尤其是在保持典范的完全切除率方面。病例在手术时输入,收集有关身体部位、临床边缘、疑似诊断、手术类型和闭合的数据。收到组织学结果后,输入组织学切除边缘和肿瘤类型的数据。每位临床医生每年至少提交 3 个月的数据,数据收集从 2012 年 4 月开始,到 2018 年 3 月结束。根据组织学诊断,切除手术包括50%的基底细胞癌(BCC)、12%的鳞状细胞癌(SCC)、9%的恶性黑色素瘤(MM)和1%的麦粒肿(LM),以及28%的 "其他"(罕见恶性肿瘤、黑色素瘤宽局部切除疤痕和癌前病变/良性病变)。该部门的诊断一致性良好:BCC 92%、SCC 87%、MM 80%、LM 53%。完全切除率高达 97.07%。最成功切除的癌症是 BCC(97.50%),然后是 SCC(97.14%)、MM(96.48%)和 LM(95.23%)。该科室提供了许多复杂的手术,包括8.3%的皮瓣和8.5%的移植物。病灶平均直径为 11 毫米(范围为 2-90 毫米)。多年来,BCC、MM 和 LM 的切除率有了明显提高。虽然在 SCC 方面没有发现明显差异,但这组患者在研究开始时的切除率已经很高。我们鼓励更多的科室使用该记录本,并分享他们生成的数据。这可以提高他们的切除率,改善患者体验,每年最多可节省 28000 英镑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical signs and utility of CT PET scan in eosinophilic fasciitis? Cognitive biases in Mohs micrographic surgery. Neurosensory symptoms and muscle cramping in morphea: A cross-sectional study and review. Numerical, phenotypic and functional differences in human dermal resident memory T cells between reticular dermal layers. T-cell-related skin inflammatory flareups with Th1 polarity in a patient with pseudoxanthoma elasticum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1