Access to Treatment Before and After Medicare Coverage of Opioid Treatment Programs

Ruijie Liu, Tamara Beetham, Helen Newton, Susan H Busch
{"title":"Access to Treatment Before and After Medicare Coverage of Opioid Treatment Programs","authors":"Ruijie Liu, Tamara Beetham, Helen Newton, Susan H Busch","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since January 2020, Medicare has covered opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services at opioid treatment programs (OTPs), the only outpatient settings allowed to dispense methadone for treating OUD. This study examined policy-associated changes in Medicare acceptance and the availability of four OUD treatment services (ongoing buprenorphine, HIV/AIDS education, employment services, and comprehensive mental health assessment), by for-profit status, and county-level changes in Medicare-accepting-OTPs access, by sociodemographic characteristics (racial composition, poverty rate, and rurality). Using data from the 2019-2022 National Directory of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Facilities, we found Medicare acceptance increased from 21.31% in 2018 to 80.76% in 2021. The availability of the four treatment services increased but no increases were significantly associated with Medicare coverage. While county-level OTP access significantly improved, counties with higher rates of nonwhite residents experienced an additional average increase of 0.86 Medicare-accepting-OTPs (95% CI: [0.05, 1.67]) compared to those without higher rates of nonwhite populations. Overall, Medicare coverage was associated with improved OTP access, not ancillary services.","PeriodicalId":502462,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs Scholar","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since January 2020, Medicare has covered opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services at opioid treatment programs (OTPs), the only outpatient settings allowed to dispense methadone for treating OUD. This study examined policy-associated changes in Medicare acceptance and the availability of four OUD treatment services (ongoing buprenorphine, HIV/AIDS education, employment services, and comprehensive mental health assessment), by for-profit status, and county-level changes in Medicare-accepting-OTPs access, by sociodemographic characteristics (racial composition, poverty rate, and rurality). Using data from the 2019-2022 National Directory of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Treatment Facilities, we found Medicare acceptance increased from 21.31% in 2018 to 80.76% in 2021. The availability of the four treatment services increased but no increases were significantly associated with Medicare coverage. While county-level OTP access significantly improved, counties with higher rates of nonwhite residents experienced an additional average increase of 0.86 Medicare-accepting-OTPs (95% CI: [0.05, 1.67]) compared to those without higher rates of nonwhite populations. Overall, Medicare coverage was associated with improved OTP access, not ancillary services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医疗保险覆盖阿片类药物治疗计划之前和之后获得治疗的情况
自 2020 年 1 月起,医疗保险(Medicare)将阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗服务纳入阿片类药物治疗项目(OTP)的承保范围,这是唯一允许配发美沙酮用于治疗 OUD 的门诊环境。本研究按营利状况研究了医疗保险接受度和四种 OUD 治疗服务(持续丁丙诺啡、艾滋病毒/艾滋病教育、就业服务和综合心理健康评估)可用性的政策相关变化,以及按社会人口特征(种族构成、贫困率和农村地区)研究了医疗保险接受 OTPs 的县级变化。利用《2019-2022 年全国药物和酒精滥用治疗机构目录》中的数据,我们发现医疗保险的接受度从 2018 年的 21.31% 提高到了 2021 年的 80.76%。四种治疗服务的可用性有所增加,但与医疗保险的覆盖率没有显著关联。虽然县级 OTP 的可及性明显改善,但与非白人居民比例较高的县相比,非白人居民比例较高的县平均增加了 0.86 个接受医疗保险的 OTP(95% CI:[0.05, 1.67])。总体而言,Medicare 的覆盖率与改善的 OTP 访问相关,而与辅助服务无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographic Variation in Shortfalls of Dementia Specialists in the U.S. Biosimilar underutilization alone does not foretell a broken biologics market Regional Variation in Length of Stay for Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation in Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Who Participates in Value-Based Care Models? Physician Characteristics and Implications for Value-based Care Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Outcomes of Post-Acute Nursing Home Care Among Patients with Dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1