The Assessment of Patent Validity by the Unified Patent Court

Peter Meier-Beck
{"title":"The Assessment of Patent Validity by the Unified Patent Court","authors":"Peter Meier-Beck","doi":"10.1093/grurint/ikae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A little more than six months after the Unified Patent Court commenced its work, the judgment of the Court of Appeal in 10x Genomics v. NanoString is the first final decision of the new court to deal in detail with the interpretation of an asserted patent claim and, based on this, with the assessment of the patentability of the subject-matter of a European patent. On the basis of this patent, a preliminary injunction was requested and issued by the Munich Local Division of the Court of First Instance. This fact alone shows that the significance of the decision can hardly be overestimated. A closer analysis of the decision confirms that it provides a wealth of insights into the way in which the UPC will deal with the questions of novelty and inventive step, which are at the centre of the examination of the validity of a patent in proceedings for interim measures, but also in proceedings on the merits. This article attempts to summarise the most important findings on substantive patent law and its application that can be derived from the decision of the UPC Court of Appeal.","PeriodicalId":506623,"journal":{"name":"GRUR International","volume":"318 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GRUR International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikae069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A little more than six months after the Unified Patent Court commenced its work, the judgment of the Court of Appeal in 10x Genomics v. NanoString is the first final decision of the new court to deal in detail with the interpretation of an asserted patent claim and, based on this, with the assessment of the patentability of the subject-matter of a European patent. On the basis of this patent, a preliminary injunction was requested and issued by the Munich Local Division of the Court of First Instance. This fact alone shows that the significance of the decision can hardly be overestimated. A closer analysis of the decision confirms that it provides a wealth of insights into the way in which the UPC will deal with the questions of novelty and inventive step, which are at the centre of the examination of the validity of a patent in proceedings for interim measures, but also in proceedings on the merits. This article attempts to summarise the most important findings on substantive patent law and its application that can be derived from the decision of the UPC Court of Appeal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
统一专利法院对专利有效性的评估
在统一专利法院开始工作六个多月后,上诉法院在 10x Genomics 诉 NanoString 案中的判决是新法院的第一份终审判决,该判决详细处理了对所主张的专利权利要求的解释,并在此基础上评估了欧洲专利标的物的可专利性。根据这项专利,慕尼黑初审法院地方法庭申请并签发了初步禁令。仅这一点就足以说明该判决的重要性。对该判决的仔细分析证实,它为 UPC 处理新颖性和创造性问题的方式提供了丰富的启示,而新颖性和创造性问题是临时措施程序和实质问题程序中专利有效性审查的核心。本文试图总结从 UPC 上诉法院的裁决中可以得出的有关专利实体法及其应用的最重要结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liability for the Offence of Counterfeiting Famous Trade Marks Implications of Missing the Newly Introduced Deadline for Supplementary Protection Application Platform Law as EU Law Consequences of Asserting Rights Under a Patent Later Declared Invalid Admissibility of Advertising Puffery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1