Understanding English Language Arts Teachers’ Listening Orientations in Middle School Gifted Classrooms

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Advanced Academics Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1177/1932202x241259063
Cindy M. Gilson, Micah N. Bruce-Davis, Erica J. Lamm
{"title":"Understanding English Language Arts Teachers’ Listening Orientations in Middle School Gifted Classrooms","authors":"Cindy M. Gilson, Micah N. Bruce-Davis, Erica J. Lamm","doi":"10.1177/1932202x241259063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within gifted education, discourse-based instructional methods, such as Socratic Seminars, are identified as strategies to support the development of gifted and advanced readers’ critical thinking skills. While research on dialogic discourse has centered on key components such as discourse patterns and the types of questions teachers ask, the unique nature of teachers’ listening has a limited research base. In this qualitative study, we examined five teachers’ perceptions, focusing on one teacher as an illustrative case, of their listening during dialogic discourse-based lessons with gifted and advanced readers. Major themes included that (a) teachers’ listening is multifaceted and individualized, (b) teachers listen for certain reasons, (c) teachers’ expectations inform their and their students’ roles during discourse, and (d) teachers’ listening is related to their belief systems, and (e) there are barriers to effective listening. Implications for practice and research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Academics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Academics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x241259063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within gifted education, discourse-based instructional methods, such as Socratic Seminars, are identified as strategies to support the development of gifted and advanced readers’ critical thinking skills. While research on dialogic discourse has centered on key components such as discourse patterns and the types of questions teachers ask, the unique nature of teachers’ listening has a limited research base. In this qualitative study, we examined five teachers’ perceptions, focusing on one teacher as an illustrative case, of their listening during dialogic discourse-based lessons with gifted and advanced readers. Major themes included that (a) teachers’ listening is multifaceted and individualized, (b) teachers listen for certain reasons, (c) teachers’ expectations inform their and their students’ roles during discourse, and (d) teachers’ listening is related to their belief systems, and (e) there are barriers to effective listening. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解初中资优课堂中英语语言艺术教师的倾听取向
在资优教育中,苏格拉底研讨会等以对话为基础的教学方法被认为是培养资优和高级读者批判性思维能力的策略。虽然对对话式话语的研究主要集中在话语模式和教师提问类型等关键要素上,但对教师倾听的独特性的研究却十分有限。在这项定性研究中,我们以一位教师为例,考察了五位教师在与资优读者和高级读者进行基于对话话语的课程中的倾听情况。主要研究主题包括:(a)教师的倾听是多方面的和个性化的;(b)教师倾听有一定的原因;(c)教师的期望决定了他们和学生在对话中的角色;(d)教师的倾听与他们的信念系统有关;(e)有效倾听存在障碍。讨论了对实践和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Academics
Journal of Advanced Academics EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Word: Relationships Course Correction: Navigating Equity in Ninth-Grade Advanced Placement Navigating AP Research: Unveiling Applied Technology High School Students’ Perspectives, Gains, and Challenges Understanding English Language Arts Teachers’ Listening Orientations in Middle School Gifted Classrooms The Editorial Word: Interact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1