Does Vascular Dementia Exist? Report of Two Cases Previously Diagnosed with Vascular Dementia Treated by Means of Ventriculoatrial Shunts

Hari K. Garachetla, Kiyoshi Takagi, Ryosuke Takagi, Yoko Kato
{"title":"Does Vascular Dementia Exist? Report of Two Cases Previously Diagnosed with Vascular Dementia Treated by Means of Ventriculoatrial Shunts","authors":"Hari K. Garachetla, Kiyoshi Takagi, Ryosuke Takagi, Yoko Kato","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most common cause of dementia after Alzheimer's disease. While new therapeutic modalities have been available for Alzheimer's disease, there is currently no effective treatment for VaD. We encountered two cases with VaD who recovered their cognitive function to normal levels after ventriculoatrial shunt (VA shunt). Both cases complained cognitive impairment shortly after cerebral infarctions. Their brain images showed ventricular dilatation without the findings of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, which is regarded as characteristic for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Both cases were initially diagnosed as VaD by board neurosurgeons. However, since they showed positive response to lumbar tap test, VA shunts were performed. Both cases recovered their cognitive function to normal level. Their excellent cognitive outcomes after VA shunts indicate that many iNPH patients with lacunar infarcts may possibly be misdiagnosed as VaD.","PeriodicalId":8521,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most common cause of dementia after Alzheimer's disease. While new therapeutic modalities have been available for Alzheimer's disease, there is currently no effective treatment for VaD. We encountered two cases with VaD who recovered their cognitive function to normal levels after ventriculoatrial shunt (VA shunt). Both cases complained cognitive impairment shortly after cerebral infarctions. Their brain images showed ventricular dilatation without the findings of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, which is regarded as characteristic for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Both cases were initially diagnosed as VaD by board neurosurgeons. However, since they showed positive response to lumbar tap test, VA shunts were performed. Both cases recovered their cognitive function to normal level. Their excellent cognitive outcomes after VA shunts indicate that many iNPH patients with lacunar infarcts may possibly be misdiagnosed as VaD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管性痴呆存在吗?通过脑室-心房分流术治疗两例既往诊断为血管性痴呆的病例报告
摘要 血管性痴呆(VaD)是仅次于阿尔茨海默病的第二大痴呆病因。虽然阿尔茨海默病已经有了新的治疗方法,但血管性痴呆目前还没有有效的治疗方法。我们遇到过两例认知功能障碍患者,他们在接受脑室-心房分流术(VA 分流术)后认知功能恢复到了正常水平。两例患者均在脑梗塞后不久出现认知功能障碍。他们的大脑图像显示脑室扩张,但没有发现蛛网膜下腔不成比例扩大的脑积水,而这被认为是特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)的特征。这两个病例最初都被神经外科医生诊断为 VaD。然而,由于他们对腰椎拍击试验呈阳性反应,因此进行了 VA 分流。两个病例的认知功能都恢复到了正常水平。VA分流术后,他们的认知功能得到了很好的恢复,这表明许多患有腔隙性脑梗塞的iNPH患者可能被误诊为VaD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Fluid Therapy on Acid–Base Balance in Patients Undergoing Clipping for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Primary CNS Melanoma of Meckel's Cave: A Rare Case with Literature Review Combined Direct and Indirect Revascularization for Adults with Moyamoya Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Usefulness and Safety of Gelatin–Thrombin Matrix Sealants in Minimally Invasive Microscopic Discectomy Early Tracheostomy versus Late Tracheostomy in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1