UK fiscal policy and external balance under Bretton Woods: Twin deficits or distant relatives?

IF 1.6 1区 历史学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic History Review Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1111/ehr.13352
Joshua J. Banerjee
{"title":"UK fiscal policy and external balance under Bretton Woods: Twin deficits or distant relatives?","authors":"Joshua J. Banerjee","doi":"10.1111/ehr.13352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The United Kingdom (UK) is typically regarded as the sine qua non case of an economy experiencing chronic external imbalances under the post-war Bretton Woods system, apparently unable to reconcile the divergent objectives of robust economic growth and current account equilibrium. This paper investigates the famed ‘twin deficits hypothesis’, which ascribed responsibility for the UK's current account woes to an excessively lax fiscal policy. Calling on two distinct approaches to identifying fiscal shocks, we find evidence decisively against the traditional twin deficits view, and uncover serious shortcomings in the way that both policymakers and academics conceptualized the transmission of fiscal policy to the current account. Our results demonstrate that factors other than fiscal policy are of considerably greater importance for understanding the UK's historical experience, and we elaborate on the need for a reappraisal of some classic policy debates concerning external adjustment under the Bretton Woods system.</p>","PeriodicalId":47868,"journal":{"name":"Economic History Review","volume":"78 2","pages":"583-612"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ehr.13352","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.13352","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) is typically regarded as the sine qua non case of an economy experiencing chronic external imbalances under the post-war Bretton Woods system, apparently unable to reconcile the divergent objectives of robust economic growth and current account equilibrium. This paper investigates the famed ‘twin deficits hypothesis’, which ascribed responsibility for the UK's current account woes to an excessively lax fiscal policy. Calling on two distinct approaches to identifying fiscal shocks, we find evidence decisively against the traditional twin deficits view, and uncover serious shortcomings in the way that both policymakers and academics conceptualized the transmission of fiscal policy to the current account. Our results demonstrate that factors other than fiscal policy are of considerably greater importance for understanding the UK's historical experience, and we elaborate on the need for a reappraisal of some classic policy debates concerning external adjustment under the Bretton Woods system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布雷顿森林体系下的英国财政政策和对外收支平衡:双赤字还是远亲?
在战后布雷顿森林体系下,英国被视为经济长期对外失衡的典型案例,它显然无法兼顾经济强劲增长与经常账户平衡这两个不同的目标。本文对著名的 "双赤字假说 "进行了研究,该假说将英国经常账户困境的责任归咎于过于宽松的财政政策。利用两种不同的方法来识别财政冲击,我们发现了与传统的双赤字观点截然相反的证据,并揭示了决策者和学者在将财政政策传导至经常账户的概念化方式上存在的严重缺陷。我们的研究结果表明,要理解英国的历史经验,财政政策以外的其他因素的重要性要大得多,我们还阐述了重新评估布雷顿森林体系下有关外部调整的一些经典政策辩论的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Economic History Review is published quarterly and each volume contains over 800 pages. It is an invaluable source of information and is available free to members of the Economic History Society. Publishing reviews of books, periodicals and information technology, The Review will keep anyone interested in economic and social history abreast of current developments in the subject. It aims at broad coverage of themes of economic and social change, including the intellectual, political and cultural implications of these changes.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Capital in Banking, The Role of Capital in Banking in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century: The United Kingdom, the United States and Switzerland. Simon Amrein, (Cambridge University Press, 2024. Pp. 225. ISBN 9781009276894. HbK £85) A Millennial View of Spain's Development. Leandro Prados de la Escosura (Springer, 2024. Pp. 375. ISBN 9783031607912. HbK £44,99) Lordship, State Formation and Local Authority in Late Medieval and Early Modern England. Spike Gibbs, (Cambridge University Press, 2023. Pp. 304. ISBN 9781009311830. HbK £85) Commercial Banking in Kenya A History from Colonisation to Digital Age. Christian Velasco, (Abingdon: Routledge, 2024. Pp. 192. ISBN 9781032658605. Hbk £104)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1