Placing animals in the Plantationocene: The plantation after/lives of nutria in Eastern Germany

Lukas Adolphi, Larissa Fleischmann
{"title":"Placing animals in the Plantationocene: The plantation after/lives of nutria in Eastern Germany","authors":"Lukas Adolphi, Larissa Fleischmann","doi":"10.1177/25148486241256547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nutria ( Myocastor coypus), also known as coypu or ‘river rats’, are big semi-aquatic rodents that originate from South America and were shipped to Europe for fur production in the late 1800s. Today, the animals live in wild populations in many places around the globe. One of these places is the Eastern German city of Halle is where they have been able to establish themselves in large populations along the river Saale. This article situates the history and presence of nutria in Eastern Germany in the Plantationocene. The Plantationocene concept regards the plantation as a structuring feature of our present. In the plantation, humans and nonhumans are separated, hierarchically ordered and exploited along different power axes, so that standardised, scalable production becomes possible. In this sense, we argue that the nutria farms of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) followed plantation logics that resembled that of ‘actual’ plantations and that exploited their forced animal labour for fur production. With German reunification, however, nutria lost their economic value and, in many cases, were simply released to save on ‘disposal costs’. Outside the nutria farms, they developed plantation afterlives, where similar logics continued to exert violence on their bodies, such as in their recent classification as ‘invasive alien species’, but were also challenged in a number of ways. Taking cue from recent discussions on the Plantationocene, this article can be considered as an intervention and invitation to move beyond the plantation in the literal sense of the term, so as to study how the Plantationocene works across different species, spaces and times, while being attentive to its limitations.","PeriodicalId":507916,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241256547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nutria ( Myocastor coypus), also known as coypu or ‘river rats’, are big semi-aquatic rodents that originate from South America and were shipped to Europe for fur production in the late 1800s. Today, the animals live in wild populations in many places around the globe. One of these places is the Eastern German city of Halle is where they have been able to establish themselves in large populations along the river Saale. This article situates the history and presence of nutria in Eastern Germany in the Plantationocene. The Plantationocene concept regards the plantation as a structuring feature of our present. In the plantation, humans and nonhumans are separated, hierarchically ordered and exploited along different power axes, so that standardised, scalable production becomes possible. In this sense, we argue that the nutria farms of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) followed plantation logics that resembled that of ‘actual’ plantations and that exploited their forced animal labour for fur production. With German reunification, however, nutria lost their economic value and, in many cases, were simply released to save on ‘disposal costs’. Outside the nutria farms, they developed plantation afterlives, where similar logics continued to exert violence on their bodies, such as in their recent classification as ‘invasive alien species’, but were also challenged in a number of ways. Taking cue from recent discussions on the Plantationocene, this article can be considered as an intervention and invitation to move beyond the plantation in the literal sense of the term, so as to study how the Plantationocene works across different species, spaces and times, while being attentive to its limitations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将动物置于种植世:德国东部栗鼠的种植园之余/生活
金目啮齿动物(Myocastor coypus),又称 "河鼠",是一种大型半水生啮齿动物,原产于南美洲,19 世纪末被运往欧洲生产毛皮。如今,这种动物在全球许多地方都有野生种群。其中一个地方是德国东部城市哈勒,它们在那里的萨勒河沿岸建立了自己的庞大种群。本文将秧鸡在德国东部种植新世的历史和存在情况归纳为种植新世。种植世概念认为种植园是我们现在的一个结构性特征。在种植园中,人类和非人类被分离开来,按照不同的权力轴进行等级排序和剥削,从而使标准化、规模化生产成为可能。从这个意义上说,我们认为德意志民主共和国(GDR)的栗鼠养殖场遵循的种植园逻辑与 "实际 "种植园类似,利用强迫动物劳动生产毛皮。然而,随着德国的统一,栗鼠失去了经济价值,在许多情况下,为了节省 "处理成本",栗鼠被放生。在栗鼠养殖场之外,栗鼠的后半生在种植园中度过,类似的逻辑继续对栗鼠的身体施加暴力,例如最近将其列为 "外来入侵物种",但栗鼠也受到了多方面的挑战。借鉴近期关于种植园世的讨论,本文可视为一种干预和邀请,以超越字面意义上的种植园,从而研究种植园世如何在不同物种、空间和时间之间发挥作用,同时注意其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reindeer, rockets and space infrastructures: Enacting oligoptic-satellitarian environments in Northern Sweden Uncertainty talk for bio-digital technologies: Expert conceptions of uncertainties in genomic selection for forestry Accessible nature: Balancing contradiction in protected areas Ecology of grief: Climatic events and disasters in the Himalaya Against the promethean: Energy throughput and the far-right politics of degrowth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1