Does Cardiac Function Improvement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reduce All-Cause Mortality?

Akihiro Higashino MD , Yuya Tsuruta MD , Sadayuki Moriyama MD , Sumio Miura MD , Tsuyoshi Taketani MD, PhD , Takayuki Ohno MD, PhD
{"title":"Does Cardiac Function Improvement With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reduce All-Cause Mortality?","authors":"Akihiro Higashino MD ,&nbsp;Yuya Tsuruta MD ,&nbsp;Sadayuki Moriyama MD ,&nbsp;Sumio Miura MD ,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Taketani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takayuki Ohno MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on cardiac function improvement remains controversial. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that improvement in cardiac function after CABG does not improve life expectancy. This study aimed to examine whether CABG improved cardiac function and how this improvement influenced all-cause mortality and to compare patient prognosis according to preoperative cardiac function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35% who underwent CABG between January 1994 and December 2022. We compared patients with and without cardiac function improvement, defined as an increase in LVEF of ≥10%, to identify associated factors and assess the impact on all-cause mortality. We also compared outcomes according to the degree of preoperative LV dysfunction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 166 patients included, 102 and 64 had a preoperative LVEF of 25%-35% and ≤25%, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 79.9 ± 72.3 months. We observed significant LVEF improvement, from 28% (range, 23.3%-35%) preoperatively to 39% (range, 31%-46%) at 13.1 months postoperatively. The 7-year survival rates were similar in the ejection fraction ≤25% and 25%-35% groups (80.2% vs 73.8%, <em>P</em> = .11). However, patients with an LVEF improvement of ≥10% exhibited a markedly better prognosis than those without LVEF improvement at 7 years (85.9% vs 63.5%, <em>P</em>=.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that CABG may enhance cardiac function in more than half of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, with a correlation to improved all-cause mortality. Moreover, LVEF improvement after CABG is associated with an improved prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 737-741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on cardiac function improvement remains controversial. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that improvement in cardiac function after CABG does not improve life expectancy. This study aimed to examine whether CABG improved cardiac function and how this improvement influenced all-cause mortality and to compare patient prognosis according to preoperative cardiac function.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35% who underwent CABG between January 1994 and December 2022. We compared patients with and without cardiac function improvement, defined as an increase in LVEF of ≥10%, to identify associated factors and assess the impact on all-cause mortality. We also compared outcomes according to the degree of preoperative LV dysfunction.

Results

Among the 166 patients included, 102 and 64 had a preoperative LVEF of 25%-35% and ≤25%, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 79.9 ± 72.3 months. We observed significant LVEF improvement, from 28% (range, 23.3%-35%) preoperatively to 39% (range, 31%-46%) at 13.1 months postoperatively. The 7-year survival rates were similar in the ejection fraction ≤25% and 25%-35% groups (80.2% vs 73.8%, P = .11). However, patients with an LVEF improvement of ≥10% exhibited a markedly better prognosis than those without LVEF improvement at 7 years (85.9% vs 63.5%, P=.001).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that CABG may enhance cardiac function in more than half of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, with a correlation to improved all-cause mortality. Moreover, LVEF improvement after CABG is associated with an improved prognosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉旁路移植术改善心功能是否会降低全因死亡率?
背景冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)对心功能改善的影响仍存在争议。此外,最近的证据表明,冠脉搭桥后心功能的改善并不能提高预期寿命。本研究旨在探讨CABG是否能改善心功能,以及这种改善如何影响全因死亡率,并根据术前心功能比较患者预后。方法回顾性研究纳入1994年1月至2022年12月间行冠脉搭桥的左室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的患者。我们比较了有和没有心功能改善的患者,定义为LVEF增加≥10%,以确定相关因素并评估对全因死亡率的影响。我们还根据术前左室功能障碍的程度比较了结果。结果纳入的166例患者中,术前LVEF为25% ~ 35%的有102例,术前LVEF≤25%的有64例。平均随访时间79.9±72.3个月。我们观察到显著的LVEF改善,从术前的28%(范围,23.3%-35%)到术后13.1个月的39%(范围,31%-46%)。射血分数≤25%组和25% ~ 35%组的7年生存率相似(80.2% vs 73.8%, P = 0.11)。然而,LVEF改善≥10%的患者在7年时的预后明显好于无LVEF改善的患者(85.9% vs 63.5%, P=.001)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,冠脉搭桥可以改善一半以上缺血性心肌病患者的心功能,并与改善全因死亡率相关。此外,冠脉搭桥后LVEF改善与预后改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Contents No-Touch Saphenous Vein Graft vs Radial Artery as an I-Composite Graft From the Right Internal Mammary Artery Zero-Heat Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting Using Water Jet: An Experimental Study Do Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery Differ by Preoperative Status and Socioeconomic Deprivation? Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Patient With an Occluded Abdominal Aorta Supported by Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1