The diagnostic performance of mean neutrophil volume in neonatal sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics and Neonatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.03.007
Alpana Mishra , Pratap Kumar Jena , Santosh Kumar Panda
{"title":"The diagnostic performance of mean neutrophil volume in neonatal sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Alpana Mishra ,&nbsp;Pratap Kumar Jena ,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar Panda","doi":"10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a need for reliable diagnostic tests for early identification of sepsis to prevent neonatal mortality and antibiotic misuse. During sepsis, many immature neutrophils came into the bloodstream, altering the mean neutrophil volume (MNV) shown in the previous studies.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To summarize the diagnostic performance of mean neutrophil volume (MNV) in neonatal sepsis from the published literature.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 to April 2023 for studies reporting MNV as a diagnostic test in neonatal sepsis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of MNV were estimated with reference blood culture-positive sepsis and clinical sepsis for meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The diagnostic performance of MNV was analyzed in 1685 neonates, including 829 septic and 856 non-septic neonates, from six prospective studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MNV were 0.87 and 0.75, respectively, for neonatal sepsis; the DOR was 20.01 (95% CI: 5.90–67.82); and the AUC of the SROC for MNV was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69–0.88). Higgins I<sup>2</sup> was 92.1% (95% CI: 85.5%–95.7%). The diagnostic performance of MNV was better during sub-group analysis of studies reporting culture-positive sepsis (DOR 85.61).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The diagnostic performance of MNV is moderate for neonatal sepsis. As the evidence originated from a small number of studies with marked heterogeneity, further large-scale diagnostic accuracy studies are recommended to resolve heterogeneity in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56095,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics and Neonatology","volume":"66 1","pages":"Pages 71-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics and Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875957224000822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a need for reliable diagnostic tests for early identification of sepsis to prevent neonatal mortality and antibiotic misuse. During sepsis, many immature neutrophils came into the bloodstream, altering the mean neutrophil volume (MNV) shown in the previous studies.

Objectives

To summarize the diagnostic performance of mean neutrophil volume (MNV) in neonatal sepsis from the published literature.

Method

Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from January 1990 to April 2023 for studies reporting MNV as a diagnostic test in neonatal sepsis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of MNV were estimated with reference blood culture-positive sepsis and clinical sepsis for meta-analysis.

Result

The diagnostic performance of MNV was analyzed in 1685 neonates, including 829 septic and 856 non-septic neonates, from six prospective studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MNV were 0.87 and 0.75, respectively, for neonatal sepsis; the DOR was 20.01 (95% CI: 5.90–67.82); and the AUC of the SROC for MNV was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69–0.88). Higgins I2 was 92.1% (95% CI: 85.5%–95.7%). The diagnostic performance of MNV was better during sub-group analysis of studies reporting culture-positive sepsis (DOR 85.61).

Conclusion

The diagnostic performance of MNV is moderate for neonatal sepsis. As the evidence originated from a small number of studies with marked heterogeneity, further large-scale diagnostic accuracy studies are recommended to resolve heterogeneity in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿败血症中平均中性粒细胞体积的诊断性能:系统回顾与元分析
需要可靠的诊断测试来早期识别败血症,以防止新生儿死亡和抗生素滥用。在脓毒症期间,许多未成熟的中性粒细胞进入血液,改变了先前研究中显示的平均中性粒细胞体积(MNV)。目的从已发表的文献中总结平均中性粒细胞体积(MNV)对新生儿脓毒症的诊断价值。方法检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science等数据库,检索1990年1月至2023年4月报道MNV作为新生儿败血症诊断试验的研究。采用参考血培养阳性脓毒症和临床脓毒症进行meta分析,估计MNV总受者工作特征(SROC)曲线的综合敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)。结果分析了来自6项前瞻性研究的1685例新生儿的MNV诊断性能,其中829例脓毒症新生儿和856例非脓毒症新生儿。MNV对新生儿脓毒症的敏感性和特异性分别为0.87和0.75;DOR为20.01 (95% CI: 5.90-67.82);MNV的SROC AUC为0.81 (95% CI: 0.69-0.88)。Higgins I2为92.1% (95% CI: 85.5% ~ 95.7%)。在报告培养阳性脓毒症的研究亚组分析中,MNV的诊断性能更好(DOR 85.61)。结论MNV对新生儿败血症的诊断价值中等。由于证据来自少数具有明显异质性的研究,建议在未来进一步进行大规模的诊断准确性研究以解决异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Pediatrics and Neonatology is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Pediatric Association and The Society of Neonatology ROC, and is indexed in EMBASE and SCOPUS. Articles on clinical and laboratory research in pediatrics and related fields are eligible for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Atypical case of intracerebral schwannoma in a child. Horseshoe pulmonary sequestration. Impact of early parenteral amino acid on preterm infant: A multicenter study. Risk factors for neonatal abstinence syndrome in infants born to mothers using psychotropic medications: A cohort study. Epidemiological characterization and clinical utility of the multiplex PCR FilmArray™ Gastrointestinal Panel at a tertiary university hospital in Japan, 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1