Reducing costs and improving patient recovery through a nurse-driven centralized spinal orthoses program on a post-surgical unit: A quality improvement initiative

Amber Odom , Leonie James , Sheena Butts , Charles J. French , Jonathan M. Cayce
{"title":"Reducing costs and improving patient recovery through a nurse-driven centralized spinal orthoses program on a post-surgical unit: A quality improvement initiative","authors":"Amber Odom ,&nbsp;Leonie James ,&nbsp;Sheena Butts ,&nbsp;Charles J. French ,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Cayce","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An external vendor providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses to inpatients created significant costs and barriers to quality care for spinal surgery patients. A nursing leadership team initiated a quality improvement project to reduce the cost of providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses and improve the care provided to spinal patients.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a nursing-led process for providing off-the-shelf orthoses to spinal surgery patients and eliminate high costs.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quality improvement project evaluated as a retrospective interrupted time-series</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Post Surgery Inpatient Unit Level II Trauma Center in a United States hospital located in Florida</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Vendor Program: 134 patients; Centralized Program: 155 patients</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The nursing leadership team developed a centralized spinal orthoses program where the bedside nurse fitted the patient with a spinal orthosis, eliminating the need for an external orthotist. The study quantifies changes in study metrics by comparing patients identified through chart review who received care in the vendor program to those who received care in the centralized program utilizing nonparametric statistical techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The centralized nursing-led spinal orthosis program allowed the unit to mobilize patients more quickly than patients managed under the vendor program (3.85 hr. [95 % CI: 1.27 to 7.26 hrs] reduction; <em>p</em> = 0.004). The overall length of stay was reduced by 0.78 days ([1.34 – 0.02 days]; <em>p</em> = 0.063) or 18.72 h. While the statistical test did not indicate significance, the 18.72-hour reduction in length of stay represents a potential clinically relevant finding. Evaluating patients that suffered a primary spinal injury and no complications (vendor program: 54 patients; centralized program: 86 patients) showed a similar reduction in time to mobilization (4.5 hr reduction [0.53 to 12.93 hrs]; <em>p</em> = 0.025), but the length of stay reduction increased to 1.02 days [0.12 to 1.97 days], a difference determined to be statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.014). Centralizing the process for providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses reduced the cost of a thoracic-lumbar sacral orthosis by $1,483 and the price of a lumbar-sacral orthosis by $1,327. Throughout the study, the new program reduced the cost of providing spinal orthoses by $175,319.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results demonstrate that the nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program positively impacted the quality of care provided to our patients while also reducing the cost of delivering the orthoses.</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>A nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program reduces the cost of care while reducing time to mobilization and length of stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000390/pdfft?md5=ea873b1bd096b1d7a790c6acedce3b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000390-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

An external vendor providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses to inpatients created significant costs and barriers to quality care for spinal surgery patients. A nursing leadership team initiated a quality improvement project to reduce the cost of providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses and improve the care provided to spinal patients.

Objective

To develop and evaluate a nursing-led process for providing off-the-shelf orthoses to spinal surgery patients and eliminate high costs.

Design

Quality improvement project evaluated as a retrospective interrupted time-series

Setting

Post Surgery Inpatient Unit Level II Trauma Center in a United States hospital located in Florida

Participants

Vendor Program: 134 patients; Centralized Program: 155 patients

Methods

The nursing leadership team developed a centralized spinal orthoses program where the bedside nurse fitted the patient with a spinal orthosis, eliminating the need for an external orthotist. The study quantifies changes in study metrics by comparing patients identified through chart review who received care in the vendor program to those who received care in the centralized program utilizing nonparametric statistical techniques.

Results

The centralized nursing-led spinal orthosis program allowed the unit to mobilize patients more quickly than patients managed under the vendor program (3.85 hr. [95 % CI: 1.27 to 7.26 hrs] reduction; p = 0.004). The overall length of stay was reduced by 0.78 days ([1.34 – 0.02 days]; p = 0.063) or 18.72 h. While the statistical test did not indicate significance, the 18.72-hour reduction in length of stay represents a potential clinically relevant finding. Evaluating patients that suffered a primary spinal injury and no complications (vendor program: 54 patients; centralized program: 86 patients) showed a similar reduction in time to mobilization (4.5 hr reduction [0.53 to 12.93 hrs]; p = 0.025), but the length of stay reduction increased to 1.02 days [0.12 to 1.97 days], a difference determined to be statistically significant (p = 0.014). Centralizing the process for providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses reduced the cost of a thoracic-lumbar sacral orthosis by $1,483 and the price of a lumbar-sacral orthosis by $1,327. Throughout the study, the new program reduced the cost of providing spinal orthoses by $175,319.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that the nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program positively impacted the quality of care provided to our patients while also reducing the cost of delivering the orthoses.

Tweetable abstract

A nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program reduces the cost of care while reducing time to mobilization and length of stay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过在手术后病房实施由护士主导的集中式脊柱矫形器计划,降低成本并改善患者康复:质量改进计划
背景一家外部供应商为住院病人提供现成的脊柱矫形器,这给脊柱手术病人带来了巨大的成本和优质护理的障碍。一个护理领导团队发起了一项质量改进项目,以降低提供现成脊柱矫形器的成本,并改善为脊柱手术患者提供的护理服务。目标 制定并评估一项护理主导的流程,为脊柱手术患者提供现成矫形器,并消除高成本:134 名患者;中央项目:方法护理领导团队制定了集中式脊柱矫形器计划,由床边护士为患者安装脊柱矫形器,无需外聘矫形师。该研究利用非参数统计技术,将通过病历审查确定的接受供应商项目护理的患者与接受集中式项目护理的患者进行比较,从而量化研究指标的变化。结果与接受供应商项目管理的患者相比,护理主导的集中式脊柱矫形器项目使病房能更快地动员患者(减少 3.85 小时 [95 % CI:1.27 至 7.26 小时];P = 0.004)。总体住院时间减少了 0.78 天([1.34 - 0.02 天];p = 0.063)或 18.72 小时。虽然统计检验并不显著,但住院时间减少 18.72 小时代表了一个潜在的临床相关发现。对遭受原发性脊柱损伤且无并发症的患者(供应商项目:54 名患者;集中式项目:86 名患者)进行评估后发现,患者的康复时间缩短了(4.5 小时[0.53 至 12.93 小时];p = 0.025),但住院时间缩短了 1.02 天[0.12 至 1.97 天],差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.014)。集中提供现成脊柱矫形器的流程使胸椎-腰椎-骶椎矫形器的成本降低了1,483美元,腰椎-骶椎矫形器的价格降低了1,327美元。在整个研究过程中,新项目将提供脊柱矫形器的成本降低了175,319美元。结论结果表明,护理人员主导的集中式脊柱矫形器项目对我们为患者提供的护理质量产生了积极影响,同时还降低了提供矫形器的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Nurse leaders’ recommendations for implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive practices in health systems: A qualitative descriptive study Nursing interventions in a newly established community health nursing system: A cross sectional survey Grit, academic resilience, and mindset of nursing students: A cross-sectional study Psychological safety in enhancing the competence of nurse educators among early career nursing faculty in Japan: A cross-sectional study How can family members of patients in the intensive care unit be supported? A systematic review of qualitative reviews, meta-synthesis, and novel recommendations for nursing care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1