Reducing costs and improving patient recovery through a nurse-driven centralized spinal orthoses program on a post-surgical unit: A quality improvement initiative
Amber Odom , Leonie James , Sheena Butts , Charles J. French , Jonathan M. Cayce
{"title":"Reducing costs and improving patient recovery through a nurse-driven centralized spinal orthoses program on a post-surgical unit: A quality improvement initiative","authors":"Amber Odom , Leonie James , Sheena Butts , Charles J. French , Jonathan M. Cayce","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>An external vendor providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses to inpatients created significant costs and barriers to quality care for spinal surgery patients. A nursing leadership team initiated a quality improvement project to reduce the cost of providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses and improve the care provided to spinal patients.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and evaluate a nursing-led process for providing off-the-shelf orthoses to spinal surgery patients and eliminate high costs.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quality improvement project evaluated as a retrospective interrupted time-series</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Post Surgery Inpatient Unit Level II Trauma Center in a United States hospital located in Florida</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Vendor Program: 134 patients; Centralized Program: 155 patients</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The nursing leadership team developed a centralized spinal orthoses program where the bedside nurse fitted the patient with a spinal orthosis, eliminating the need for an external orthotist. The study quantifies changes in study metrics by comparing patients identified through chart review who received care in the vendor program to those who received care in the centralized program utilizing nonparametric statistical techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The centralized nursing-led spinal orthosis program allowed the unit to mobilize patients more quickly than patients managed under the vendor program (3.85 hr. [95 % CI: 1.27 to 7.26 hrs] reduction; <em>p</em> = 0.004). The overall length of stay was reduced by 0.78 days ([1.34 – 0.02 days]; <em>p</em> = 0.063) or 18.72 h. While the statistical test did not indicate significance, the 18.72-hour reduction in length of stay represents a potential clinically relevant finding. Evaluating patients that suffered a primary spinal injury and no complications (vendor program: 54 patients; centralized program: 86 patients) showed a similar reduction in time to mobilization (4.5 hr reduction [0.53 to 12.93 hrs]; <em>p</em> = 0.025), but the length of stay reduction increased to 1.02 days [0.12 to 1.97 days], a difference determined to be statistically significant (<em>p</em> = 0.014). Centralizing the process for providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses reduced the cost of a thoracic-lumbar sacral orthosis by $1,483 and the price of a lumbar-sacral orthosis by $1,327. Throughout the study, the new program reduced the cost of providing spinal orthoses by $175,319.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results demonstrate that the nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program positively impacted the quality of care provided to our patients while also reducing the cost of delivering the orthoses.</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>A nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program reduces the cost of care while reducing time to mobilization and length of stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000390/pdfft?md5=ea873b1bd096b1d7a790c6acedce3b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2666142X24000390-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
An external vendor providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses to inpatients created significant costs and barriers to quality care for spinal surgery patients. A nursing leadership team initiated a quality improvement project to reduce the cost of providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses and improve the care provided to spinal patients.
Objective
To develop and evaluate a nursing-led process for providing off-the-shelf orthoses to spinal surgery patients and eliminate high costs.
Design
Quality improvement project evaluated as a retrospective interrupted time-series
Setting
Post Surgery Inpatient Unit Level II Trauma Center in a United States hospital located in Florida
The nursing leadership team developed a centralized spinal orthoses program where the bedside nurse fitted the patient with a spinal orthosis, eliminating the need for an external orthotist. The study quantifies changes in study metrics by comparing patients identified through chart review who received care in the vendor program to those who received care in the centralized program utilizing nonparametric statistical techniques.
Results
The centralized nursing-led spinal orthosis program allowed the unit to mobilize patients more quickly than patients managed under the vendor program (3.85 hr. [95 % CI: 1.27 to 7.26 hrs] reduction; p = 0.004). The overall length of stay was reduced by 0.78 days ([1.34 – 0.02 days]; p = 0.063) or 18.72 h. While the statistical test did not indicate significance, the 18.72-hour reduction in length of stay represents a potential clinically relevant finding. Evaluating patients that suffered a primary spinal injury and no complications (vendor program: 54 patients; centralized program: 86 patients) showed a similar reduction in time to mobilization (4.5 hr reduction [0.53 to 12.93 hrs]; p = 0.025), but the length of stay reduction increased to 1.02 days [0.12 to 1.97 days], a difference determined to be statistically significant (p = 0.014). Centralizing the process for providing off-the-shelf spinal orthoses reduced the cost of a thoracic-lumbar sacral orthosis by $1,483 and the price of a lumbar-sacral orthosis by $1,327. Throughout the study, the new program reduced the cost of providing spinal orthoses by $175,319.
Conclusions
The results demonstrate that the nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program positively impacted the quality of care provided to our patients while also reducing the cost of delivering the orthoses.
Tweetable abstract
A nursing-led centralized spinal orthosis program reduces the cost of care while reducing time to mobilization and length of stay.