Interventions and their efficacy in supporting language development among preterm children aged 0-3 years – A systematic review

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Early human development Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106057
Anna Markkula, Riikka Pyhälä-Neuvonen, Suvi Stolt
{"title":"Interventions and their efficacy in supporting language development among preterm children aged 0-3 years – A systematic review","authors":"Anna Markkula,&nbsp;Riikka Pyhälä-Neuvonen,&nbsp;Suvi Stolt","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Preterm children have a higher risk for linguistic delays than full-term infants but are rarely provided with language intervention at an early age. Knowledge on early language interventions targeted to preterm children is scarce, and efficacy of the interventions is rarely reported.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This systematic review aims to identify interventions for preterm children aged 0–3 years with at least one language outcome. Efficacy of the interventions and quality of the study reports were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>The article search was carried out in six databases: EBSCOhost, Scopus, ERIC, LLBA, Ovid, and Web of Science. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for language outcomes. Quality of the study reports was assessed using the levels of evidence system by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 28 studies identified were divided into three groups: interventions at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, interventions during the first year, and interventions during the second and/or third years. Most of the interventions focused on supporting child-care and general development. Of the interventions, 61 % were efficacious in supporting language development of preterm children. The most promising results regarding efficacy were interventions conducted during the second and/or third years (80 %). Quality of the reports varied from high/good (89 %) to low (11 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The 28 existing studies provide limited evidence of the efficacy of very early interventions promoting language development of preterm children. However, especially the results for interventions conducted during the second and/or third years show promise. More studies, particularly language-focused interventions with longer follow-ups, are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001269/pdfft?md5=5a18bc067dc793c9806a523459abfcf0&pid=1-s2.0-S0378378224001269-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preterm children have a higher risk for linguistic delays than full-term infants but are rarely provided with language intervention at an early age. Knowledge on early language interventions targeted to preterm children is scarce, and efficacy of the interventions is rarely reported.

Aim

This systematic review aims to identify interventions for preterm children aged 0–3 years with at least one language outcome. Efficacy of the interventions and quality of the study reports were evaluated.

Study design

The article search was carried out in six databases: EBSCOhost, Scopus, ERIC, LLBA, Ovid, and Web of Science. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for language outcomes. Quality of the study reports was assessed using the levels of evidence system by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

Results

The 28 studies identified were divided into three groups: interventions at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, interventions during the first year, and interventions during the second and/or third years. Most of the interventions focused on supporting child-care and general development. Of the interventions, 61 % were efficacious in supporting language development of preterm children. The most promising results regarding efficacy were interventions conducted during the second and/or third years (80 %). Quality of the reports varied from high/good (89 %) to low (11 %).

Conclusion

The 28 existing studies provide limited evidence of the efficacy of very early interventions promoting language development of preterm children. However, especially the results for interventions conducted during the second and/or third years show promise. More studies, particularly language-focused interventions with longer follow-ups, are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持 0-3 岁早产儿语言发展的干预措施及其效果 - 系统综述
背景早产儿比足月儿有更高的语言发育迟缓风险,但却很少得到早期语言干预。有关早产儿早期语言干预的知识很少,干预的效果也鲜有报道。目的本系统性综述旨在确定针对 0-3 岁早产儿的干预措施,这些干预措施至少有一项语言成果。研究设计在六个数据库中进行了文章检索:研究设计在以下六个数据库中进行了文章检索:EBSCOhost、Scopus、ERIC、LLBA、Ovid 和 Web of Science。计算了语言结果的效应大小(Hedges'g)。研究报告的质量采用美国言语-语言-听力协会(American Speech-Language-Hearing Association)的证据等级系统进行评估。结果发现的 28 项研究分为三组:新生儿重症监护室的干预措施、第一年的干预措施以及第二年和/或第三年的干预措施。大多数干预措施侧重于支持儿童保育和一般发展。在这些干预措施中,61%对早产儿的语言发展有效。在第二和/或第三年进行的干预最有成效(80%)。报告的质量从高/好(89%)到低(11%)不等。结论 现有的 28 项研究为促进早产儿语言发展的早期干预措施的有效性提供了有限的证据。然而,特别是在第二和/或第三年进行的干预结果显示了前景。需要进行更多的研究,特别是以语言为重点的干预措施和更长时间的跟踪研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
期刊最新文献
Mental health screening for parents following surgical neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge. Non-nutritional use of human milk as a therapeutic agent in neonates: Brain, gut, and immunologic targets "Sink or swim": mothers' experiences of extremely preterm infants after 15 years from birth. Oral motor interventions used to support the development of oral feeding skills in preterm infants: An integrative review. Feasibility of a Dutch post-discharge parenting intervention (TOP program) for moderate preterm born infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1