An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok

Melanie Shackleford MD , Anna Horvath BS , Mayra Repetto BS , Andrea Thi BS , Rory Twells BS , Maggie Sanders BS , Stephanie Fernandez BS , Dale Netski PhD , Kavita Batra PhD, MPH, BDS, FRSPH , Nadia Gomez MD, MBA , Leanne Free MD, MSCS
{"title":"An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok","authors":"Melanie Shackleford MD ,&nbsp;Anna Horvath BS ,&nbsp;Mayra Repetto BS ,&nbsp;Andrea Thi BS ,&nbsp;Rory Twells BS ,&nbsp;Maggie Sanders BS ,&nbsp;Stephanie Fernandez BS ,&nbsp;Dale Netski PhD ,&nbsp;Kavita Batra PhD, MPH, BDS, FRSPH ,&nbsp;Nadia Gomez MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Leanne Free MD, MSCS","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>TikTok has increasingly become a source of information about reproductive health. Patients seeking health information about oral contraception on TikTok may be influenced by videos containing misinformation or biased information.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This social media infodemiological study aims to provide a descriptive content analysis of the quality and reliability of oral contraceptive health information on TikTok.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Researchers screened 1,000 TikTok videos from December 2022 to March 2023 retrieved under various search terms related to oral contraceptives. Data, including engagement metrics such as views, likes, comments, saves, and shares, were recorded. Video content including contraceptive methods discussed, efficacy, tolerability, and side effects were recorded. Two reviewers independently used a modified DISCERN criteria and Global Quality Scale (GQS) to assess the quality and reliability of information for each video.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five hundred seventy-four videos were analyzed after applying exclusion criteria. Videos had a median length of 27 seconds (Q1=13sec, Q3=57sec) and received a median of 35,000 total views (Q1=4856 views, Q3=411,400 views) and 166 views per day (Q1=28 views per day, Q3=2021 views per day). Video creators were 83.3% female and 58.7% white. The mean modified DISCERN score was 1.63 (SD=1.06) and the mean GQS score was 2.28 (SD=1.37). Video creators were 83.3% female and 58.7% white. The mean modified DISCERN score was 1.63 (SD=1.06) and the mean GQS score was 2.28 (SD=1.37). The most common topic discussed in the videos was the effects of contraception. Healthcare professionals had significantly higher DISCERN and GQS scores (<em>p</em>&lt;.001) than non-healthcare professionals. However, they received fewer views, likes, and comments on their videos (<em>p</em>&lt;.001). Healthcare professionals were 86 times more likely than non-healthcare professionals to post educational videos (<em>p</em>&lt;.001). However, non-educational content received significantly more views, likes, and comments than educational content (<em>p</em>&lt;.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TikTok videos related to oral contraceptive health had low quality and reliability of information. The majority of videos were made by non-healthcare providers, and the most common topic discussed was the effects of contraception. Videos made by healthcare professionals contained more reliable contraceptive information, but received less engagement than videos made by non-healthcare professionals. Healthcare providers should consider the prevalence of poor-quality information about oral contraceptives on social media when counseling and educating patients about reproductive health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000583/pdfft?md5=5f992e9207e8a384ef1eabae2ed8b761&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000583-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

TikTok has increasingly become a source of information about reproductive health. Patients seeking health information about oral contraception on TikTok may be influenced by videos containing misinformation or biased information.

Objective

This social media infodemiological study aims to provide a descriptive content analysis of the quality and reliability of oral contraceptive health information on TikTok.

Study Design

Researchers screened 1,000 TikTok videos from December 2022 to March 2023 retrieved under various search terms related to oral contraceptives. Data, including engagement metrics such as views, likes, comments, saves, and shares, were recorded. Video content including contraceptive methods discussed, efficacy, tolerability, and side effects were recorded. Two reviewers independently used a modified DISCERN criteria and Global Quality Scale (GQS) to assess the quality and reliability of information for each video.

Results

Five hundred seventy-four videos were analyzed after applying exclusion criteria. Videos had a median length of 27 seconds (Q1=13sec, Q3=57sec) and received a median of 35,000 total views (Q1=4856 views, Q3=411,400 views) and 166 views per day (Q1=28 views per day, Q3=2021 views per day). Video creators were 83.3% female and 58.7% white. The mean modified DISCERN score was 1.63 (SD=1.06) and the mean GQS score was 2.28 (SD=1.37). Video creators were 83.3% female and 58.7% white. The mean modified DISCERN score was 1.63 (SD=1.06) and the mean GQS score was 2.28 (SD=1.37). The most common topic discussed in the videos was the effects of contraception. Healthcare professionals had significantly higher DISCERN and GQS scores (p<.001) than non-healthcare professionals. However, they received fewer views, likes, and comments on their videos (p<.001). Healthcare professionals were 86 times more likely than non-healthcare professionals to post educational videos (p<.001). However, non-educational content received significantly more views, likes, and comments than educational content (p<.001).

Conclusion

TikTok videos related to oral contraceptive health had low quality and reliability of information. The majority of videos were made by non-healthcare providers, and the most common topic discussed was the effects of contraception. Videos made by healthcare professionals contained more reliable contraceptive information, but received less engagement than videos made by non-healthcare professionals. Healthcare providers should consider the prevalence of poor-quality information about oral contraceptives on social media when counseling and educating patients about reproductive health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 TikTok 上口服避孕药相关视频的分析
背景TikTok日益成为生殖健康信息的来源。在 TikTok 上寻求口服避孕药健康信息的患者可能会受到含有错误信息或偏差信息的视频的影响。研究设计研究人员筛选了 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 3 月期间根据与口服避孕药相关的各种搜索词检索到的 1,000 个 TikTok 视频。研究人员记录了包括浏览量、点赞数、评论数、保存数和分享数等参与度指标在内的数据。记录的视频内容包括讨论的避孕方法、疗效、耐受性和副作用。两名审查员独立使用修改后的 DISCERN 标准和全球质量量表 (GQS) 评估每个视频的信息质量和可靠性。视频长度的中位数为 27 秒(Q1=13 秒,Q3=57 秒),总浏览量的中位数为 35,000 次(Q1=4856 次,Q3=411,400 次),日浏览量为 166 次(Q1=28 次/日,Q3=2021 次/日)。视频创作者中 83.3% 为女性,58.7% 为白人。修改后的 DISCERN 平均得分为 1.63(标准差=1.06),GQS 平均得分为 2.28(标准差=1.37)。视频创作者中 83.3% 为女性,58.7% 为白人。修正后的 DISCERN 平均得分为 1.63(标准差=1.06),GQS 平均得分为 2.28(标准差=1.37)。视频中最常讨论的话题是避孕效果。医护人员的 DISCERN 和 GQS 得分(p<.001)明显高于非医护人员。但是,他们的视频获得的浏览量、点赞和评论数量都较少(p< .001)。医疗保健专业人员发布教育视频的可能性是非医疗保健专业人员的 86 倍(p< .001)。然而,非教育性内容获得的浏览量、点赞数和评论数都明显高于教育性内容(p< .001)。大多数视频是由非医疗保健提供者制作的,最常讨论的话题是避孕效果。医疗保健专业人员制作的视频包含更可靠的避孕信息,但与非医疗保健专业人员制作的视频相比,参与度较低。医疗保健提供者在为患者提供生殖健康咨询和教育时,应考虑到社交媒体上关于口服避孕药的劣质信息的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Sheehan syndrome following massive postpartum hemorrhage due to vulvar hematoma The role of the RHOA/ROCK pathway in the regulation of myometrial stages throughout pregnancy Thoughts and opinions about fertility preservation and family building from the transgender community—an interview-based approach Guillain-Barré syndrome in pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature Using machine learning to predict the risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using a contemporary nulliparous cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1