The role of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer treatment reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102784
Wenqi Zhou , Yeli Yue , Jing Xiong , Wei Li , Xiaohua Zeng
{"title":"The role of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Wenqi Zhou ,&nbsp;Yeli Yue ,&nbsp;Jing Xiong ,&nbsp;Wei Li ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We performed an updated <em>meta</em>-analysis to explore the value of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing primary tumor resection with systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were estimated and pooled.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six studies were eligible, including a total of 1368 patients. Both OS (HR = 0.86; 95 %CI: 0.77–0.96; p = 0.01; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 45 %) and LRFS (HR = 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.20–0.62; p = 0.0003; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 83 %) were significantly improved with locoregional surgery compared with systemic therapy alone. There was no significant difference in terms of DRFS (HR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.41–2.22; p = 0.92; <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> = 86 %). The OS benefit was more pronounced in hormone receptor-positive patients (HR = 0.79; p = 0.003) and HER2-negative patients (HR = 0.80; p = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrated that locoregional surgery conferred significant OS and LRFS benefits in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients and may serve as an alternative choice for selected patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102784"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the value of locoregional surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing primary tumor resection with systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were estimated and pooled.

Results

Six studies were eligible, including a total of 1368 patients. Both OS (HR = 0.86; 95 %CI: 0.77–0.96; p = 0.01; I2 = 45 %) and LRFS (HR = 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.20–0.62; p = 0.0003; I2 = 83 %) were significantly improved with locoregional surgery compared with systemic therapy alone. There was no significant difference in terms of DRFS (HR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.41–2.22; p = 0.92; I2 = 86 %). The OS benefit was more pronounced in hormone receptor-positive patients (HR = 0.79; p = 0.003) and HER2-negative patients (HR = 0.80; p = 0.003).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that locoregional surgery conferred significant OS and LRFS benefits in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients and may serve as an alternative choice for selected patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部手术在新发 IV 期乳腺癌中的作用:随机对照试验荟萃分析
背景我们进行了一项最新的荟萃分析,以探讨局部区域手术在新发 IV 期乳腺癌患者中的价值。方法我们进行了文献检索,以确定在新发 IV 期乳腺癌中比较原发肿瘤切除术与全身治疗的随机对照试验。对总生存期(OS)、局部无复发生存期(LRFS)和远处无复发生存期(DRFS)的危险比(HR)进行了估计和汇总。与单纯系统治疗相比,局部手术可显著改善OS(HR = 0.86;95 %CI:0.77-0.96;p = 0.01;I2 = 45 %)和LRFS(HR = 0.35;95 %CI:0.20-0.62;p = 0.0003;I2 = 83 %)。DRFS 方面没有明显差异(HR = 0.96; 95 %CI: 0.41-2.22; p = 0.92; I2 = 86 %)。这项研究表明,局部手术对新发IV期乳腺癌患者的OS和LRFS有明显的益处,可作为部分患者的替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimizing outcomes and personalizing care with targeted agents in advanced cholangiocarcinoma PARP inhibitors in gliomas: Mechanisms of action, current trends and future perspectives Local administration of immunotherapy for patients with skin cancer: A systematic review False Positive Rate from Prospective Studies of PET-CT in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1