Validation of the Chinese version of the Whooley questions for community screening of postpartum depression

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104054
Xia Wu , Yanping Bai , Xiaoyu Li , Kar Keung Cheng , Wenjie Gong
{"title":"Validation of the Chinese version of the Whooley questions for community screening of postpartum depression","authors":"Xia Wu ,&nbsp;Yanping Bai ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Li ,&nbsp;Kar Keung Cheng ,&nbsp;Wenjie Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The study aims to validate the Whooley questions for screening postpartum depression in Chinese women in a community setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Whooley questions was translated into Chinese following Beaton's intercultural debugging guidelines. From December 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, primary maternal and child health workers in Kaifu District and Changsha County in Changsha City recruited women aged 18 years or older who had recently given birth during home visits within seven days of discharge from hospital. Participants women completed the Whooley questions online and underwent a diagnostic interview for DSM-IV within 7 days of the visit. We evaluated Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and optimal cut-off value of the Whooley questions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 3,004 eligible women, 1,862 completed the Whooley questions and diagnostic interviews. Sixty-two women (3.3%) were diagnosed with depressive disorders. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.64, the split-half reliability was 0.64. The optimal cut-off value was when at least one questions was answered “yes”, with an AUC of 0.84 (SE=0.03, 95%CI 0.78–0.90, P&lt;0.001), sensitivity of 0.77 (95%CI 0.65–0.87), specificity of 0.89 (95%CI 0.88–0.90), PPV of 0.20 (95%CI 0.15–0.25) and NPV of 0.99 (95%CI 0.98–1.00).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study shows that the Chinese version of the Whooley questions is a reliable tool for screening postpartum depression in the community, but it may lead to many false positive cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The study aims to validate the Whooley questions for screening postpartum depression in Chinese women in a community setting.

Methods

The Whooley questions was translated into Chinese following Beaton's intercultural debugging guidelines. From December 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021, primary maternal and child health workers in Kaifu District and Changsha County in Changsha City recruited women aged 18 years or older who had recently given birth during home visits within seven days of discharge from hospital. Participants women completed the Whooley questions online and underwent a diagnostic interview for DSM-IV within 7 days of the visit. We evaluated Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and optimal cut-off value of the Whooley questions.

Results

Of the 3,004 eligible women, 1,862 completed the Whooley questions and diagnostic interviews. Sixty-two women (3.3%) were diagnosed with depressive disorders. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.64, the split-half reliability was 0.64. The optimal cut-off value was when at least one questions was answered “yes”, with an AUC of 0.84 (SE=0.03, 95%CI 0.78–0.90, P<0.001), sensitivity of 0.77 (95%CI 0.65–0.87), specificity of 0.89 (95%CI 0.88–0.90), PPV of 0.20 (95%CI 0.15–0.25) and NPV of 0.99 (95%CI 0.98–1.00).

Conclusion

This study shows that the Chinese version of the Whooley questions is a reliable tool for screening postpartum depression in the community, but it may lead to many false positive cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证用于社区产后抑郁症筛查的中文版 Whooley 问题
背景本研究旨在验证在社区环境中筛查中国妇女产后抑郁的Whouoley问题。方法按照Beaton的跨文化调试指南将Whouoley问题翻译成中文。2020年12月1日至2021年6月30日,长沙市开福区和长沙县的基层妇幼保健人员在出院7天内的家访中招募了18岁及以上的产妇。参与调查的妇女在线填写了胡利问题,并在访问后 7 天内接受了 DSM-IV 诊断访谈。我们评估了Cronbach's alpha、分半信度、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)以及Wholey问题的最佳临界值。62名妇女(3.3%)被诊断为抑郁障碍。克朗巴赫α系数为0.64,分半信度为0.64。最佳临界值是至少有一个问题回答 "是",AUC 为 0.84(SE=0.03,95%CI 0.78-0.90,P<0.001),灵敏度为 0.77(95%CI 0.65-0.87),特异性为 0.89(95%CI 0.88-0.90),PPV 为 0.20(95%CI 0.结论本研究表明,中文版Wholey问题是在社区筛查产后抑郁症的可靠工具,但可能会导致许多假阳性病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Maternal experiences and preference of maternity services in Singapore: A descriptive qualitative study. Breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers: The body image and emotional intelligence perspective Perspectives of health care providers on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound in lower-level health facilities in Kenya. Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review. Perceived stress and prenatal depression symptoms among couples with gestational diabetes mellitus: The mediating role of dyadic coping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1