An extensive study of security games with strategic informants

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104162
Weiran Shen , Minbiao Han , Weizhe Chen , Taoan Huang , Rohit Singh , Haifeng Xu , Fei Fang
{"title":"An extensive study of security games with strategic informants","authors":"Weiran Shen ,&nbsp;Minbiao Han ,&nbsp;Weizhe Chen ,&nbsp;Taoan Huang ,&nbsp;Rohit Singh ,&nbsp;Haifeng Xu ,&nbsp;Fei Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past years, game-theoretic modeling for security and public safety issues (also known as <em>security games</em>) have attracted intensive research attention and have been successfully deployed in many real-world applications for fighting, e.g., illegal poaching, fishing and urban crimes. However, few existing works consider how information from local communities would affect the structure of these games. In this paper, we systematically investigate how a new type of players – <em>strategic informants</em> who are from local communities and may observe and report upcoming attacks – affects the classic defender-attacker security interactions. Characterized by a private type, each informant has a utility structure that drives their strategic behaviors.</p><p>For situations with a single informant, we capture the problem as a 3-player extensive-form game and develop a novel solution concept, Strong Stackelberg-perfect Bayesian equilibrium, for the game. To find an optimal defender strategy, we establish that though the informant can have infinitely many types in general, there always exists an optimal defense plan using only a linear number of patrol strategies; this succinct characterization then enables us to efficiently solve the game via linear programming. For situations with multiple informants, we show that there is also an optimal defense plan with only a linear number of patrol strategies that admits a simple structure based on plurality voting among multiple informants.</p><p>Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to study the effect of the strategic informants and demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm. Our experiments show that the existence of such informants significantly increases the defender's utility. Even though the informants exhibit strategic behaviors, the information they supply holds great value as defensive resources. Compared to existing works, our study leads to a deeper understanding on the role of informants in such defender-attacker interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 104162"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224000985","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past years, game-theoretic modeling for security and public safety issues (also known as security games) have attracted intensive research attention and have been successfully deployed in many real-world applications for fighting, e.g., illegal poaching, fishing and urban crimes. However, few existing works consider how information from local communities would affect the structure of these games. In this paper, we systematically investigate how a new type of players – strategic informants who are from local communities and may observe and report upcoming attacks – affects the classic defender-attacker security interactions. Characterized by a private type, each informant has a utility structure that drives their strategic behaviors.

For situations with a single informant, we capture the problem as a 3-player extensive-form game and develop a novel solution concept, Strong Stackelberg-perfect Bayesian equilibrium, for the game. To find an optimal defender strategy, we establish that though the informant can have infinitely many types in general, there always exists an optimal defense plan using only a linear number of patrol strategies; this succinct characterization then enables us to efficiently solve the game via linear programming. For situations with multiple informants, we show that there is also an optimal defense plan with only a linear number of patrol strategies that admits a simple structure based on plurality voting among multiple informants.

Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to study the effect of the strategic informants and demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm. Our experiments show that the existence of such informants significantly increases the defender's utility. Even though the informants exhibit strategic behaviors, the information they supply holds great value as defensive resources. Compared to existing works, our study leads to a deeper understanding on the role of informants in such defender-attacker interactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有战略线人的安全博弈的广泛研究
在过去几年中,针对安全和公共安全问题的博弈论建模(也称为安全博弈)吸引了大量研究人员的关注,并已成功应用于许多现实世界中打击非法偷猎、捕鱼和城市犯罪的应用中。然而,现有研究很少考虑来自当地社区的信息会如何影响这些游戏的结构。在本文中,我们系统地研究了一种新型参与者--来自当地社区并可能观察和报告即将发生的攻击的战略线人--如何影响经典的防御者-攻击者安全互动。对于只有一个线人的情况,我们将问题视为一个三人广泛形式博弈,并为博弈提出了一个新的解决概念--强斯塔克尔伯格完美贝叶斯均衡。为了找到最佳防御策略,我们确定,虽然告密者一般可以有无限多种类型,但总是存在一个只使用线性数量的巡逻策略的最佳防御计划;这种简洁的表征使我们能够通过线性规划有效地解决博弈问题。最后,我们进行了大量实验来研究策略线人的影响,并证明了我们算法的效率。我们的实验表明,这些线人的存在大大增加了防御者的效用。即使线人表现出战略行为,他们提供的信息作为防御资源也具有巨大价值。与现有研究相比,我们的研究让人们更深入地了解了线人在这种防御者与攻击者互动中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.
期刊最新文献
Multi-rank smart reserves: A general framework for selection and matching diversity goals Out-of-distribution detection by regaining lost clues Formal verification and synthesis of mechanisms for social choice A simple yet effective self-debiasing framework for transformer models EMOA*: A framework for search-based multi-objective path planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1