Hearing the voice: Coverage of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum in Australia’s multi-ethnic public sphere

IF 0.9 Q3 COMMUNICATION Australian Journalism Review Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1386/ajr_00151_1
H. Ch’ng, Bradley A. Smith, Huong Nguyen
{"title":"Hearing the voice: Coverage of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum in Australia’s multi-ethnic public sphere","authors":"H. Ch’ng, Bradley A. Smith, Huong Nguyen","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00151_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, we compare coverage in mainstream English and minority ethnic media in Australia of the Uluru Statement proposal for a Voice and later referendum announcements, over the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2023, to compare any changes over time within and between these two sets of media. With the election of the Labor government in 2022 and subsequent referendum announcements in early 2023, we are provided an opportunity to study the influence of key actors, in this case an incoming government with a signature policy, on discourse in the multi-ethnic public sphere. Our overarching aim is to compare the extent to which an issue of national, political and civic importance is addressed across both the mainstream English and the minority ethnic public sphere in contemporary, multicultural Australia. The results of keyword searches show that, while there were significant increases in mainstream English media coverage of the Voice referendum proposal, corresponding to the election of the Labor government in 2022 and then subsequent announcements of an upcoming referendum in early 2023, there was inconsistent coverage across the minority ethnic media we studied: while significant increases in coverage in the Chinese media mirrored those in the mainstream English media, there was only a small increase in one of the Vietnamese media over the same period, and no increase in the other Vietnamese media. The findings presented here have implications for scholars and others interested in the development of a truly multicultural public sphere in Australia and elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journalism Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00151_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, we compare coverage in mainstream English and minority ethnic media in Australia of the Uluru Statement proposal for a Voice and later referendum announcements, over the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2023, to compare any changes over time within and between these two sets of media. With the election of the Labor government in 2022 and subsequent referendum announcements in early 2023, we are provided an opportunity to study the influence of key actors, in this case an incoming government with a signature policy, on discourse in the multi-ethnic public sphere. Our overarching aim is to compare the extent to which an issue of national, political and civic importance is addressed across both the mainstream English and the minority ethnic public sphere in contemporary, multicultural Australia. The results of keyword searches show that, while there were significant increases in mainstream English media coverage of the Voice referendum proposal, corresponding to the election of the Labor government in 2022 and then subsequent announcements of an upcoming referendum in early 2023, there was inconsistent coverage across the minority ethnic media we studied: while significant increases in coverage in the Chinese media mirrored those in the mainstream English media, there was only a small increase in one of the Vietnamese media over the same period, and no increase in the other Vietnamese media. The findings presented here have implications for scholars and others interested in the development of a truly multicultural public sphere in Australia and elsewhere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聆听声音:澳大利亚多民族公共领域对 "土著人对议会的声音 "全民公决的报道
在本研究中,我们比较了澳大利亚主流英语媒体和少数民族媒体在2018年1月1日至2023年3月31日期间对 "乌鲁鲁之声 "提案和后来的公投公告的报道,以比较这两类媒体内部和之间随着时间推移发生的变化。随着 2022 年工党政府的当选以及随后在 2023 年初宣布的全民公决,我们有机会研究关键行动者(在本例中是一个拥有标志性政策的即将上任的政府)对多民族公共领域话语的影响。我们的总体目标是比较在当代多元文化的澳大利亚,主流英语和少数民族公共领域在多大程度上讨论了一个具有国家、政治和公民重要性的问题。关键词搜索的结果显示,虽然主流英文媒体对 "声音 "公投提案的报道显著增加,与工党政府在2022年当选以及随后宣布即将在2023年初举行公投相对应,但我们所研究的少数民族媒体的报道却不一致:华文媒体的报道显著增加,与主流英文媒体的报道如出一辙,但在同一时期,其中一家越南媒体的报道仅有少量增加,而另一家越南媒体的报道则没有增加。本文的研究结果对学者和其他关注澳大利亚及其他地区真正多元文化公共领域发展的人具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journalism Review
Australian Journalism Review Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Younger audience perceptions of journalists on social media Journalism Practice and Critical Reflexivity, Bonita Mason (2023) Happiness in Journalism, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Avery E. Holton, Mark Deuze and Claudia Mellado (eds) (2023) An examination of factors influencing journalism educators’ perceptions on the role and future of news reporting ‘You can’t be what you can’t see’: A pilot study of reflections on diversity and inclusion in the news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1