Trial of Oxygen Delivery on Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Major Clinical Outcomes

Rawn Salenger MD , Clifford E. Fonner BA , Christa Kampert CCP , Amanda Rea DNP, CRNP , Charles Evans MD , Rakesh C. Arora MD
{"title":"Trial of Oxygen Delivery on Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Major Clinical Outcomes","authors":"Rawn Salenger MD ,&nbsp;Clifford E. Fonner BA ,&nbsp;Christa Kampert CCP ,&nbsp;Amanda Rea DNP, CRNP ,&nbsp;Charles Evans MD ,&nbsp;Rakesh C. Arora MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Low oxygen delivery (DO2) on cardiopulmonary bypass has been associated with acute kidney injury. We sought to determine the association of intraoperative DO2, postoperative length of stay, and major postoperative events.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DO2 values were calculated in 845 patients after initiation, and every 30 minutes on bypass. Pump flows were increased for DO2 &lt; 280 mL O2/min/m<sup>2</sup>, but care was not otherwise adjusted. Patients were retrospectively separated into 3 groups based on DO2 values: Group A, all readings ≥280 mL O2/min/m<sup>2</sup>; Group B, ≥1 reading &lt;280 mL O2/min/m<sup>2</sup>; Group C, ≥2 readings &lt;280 mL O2/min/m<sup>2</sup>. Patient outcomes were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 845 consecutive adult cardiac cases. Group B patients had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality compared with Group A (1.9% vs 1.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and this effect was amplified for Group C patients (2.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Postoperative length of stay was lowest for Group A patients (5.2 days) compared with Group B (6.6 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and Group C (7.0 days, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Overall complications rates were low, although Group A patients experienced lower rates of prolonged ventilation (3.5%) compared with Group B (6.5%, <em>P</em> = .04) and Group C (9.2%, <em>P</em> = .004). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed that DO2 above threshold was associated with significantly reduced rates of prolonged ventilation and postoperative length of stay. Other outcomes were similar between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Even a single DO2 value below threshold was associated with excess prolonged ventilation and postoperative length of stay, but not other outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 855-859"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Low oxygen delivery (DO2) on cardiopulmonary bypass has been associated with acute kidney injury. We sought to determine the association of intraoperative DO2, postoperative length of stay, and major postoperative events.

Methods

DO2 values were calculated in 845 patients after initiation, and every 30 minutes on bypass. Pump flows were increased for DO2 < 280 mL O2/min/m2, but care was not otherwise adjusted. Patients were retrospectively separated into 3 groups based on DO2 values: Group A, all readings ≥280 mL O2/min/m2; Group B, ≥1 reading <280 mL O2/min/m2; Group C, ≥2 readings <280 mL O2/min/m2. Patient outcomes were analyzed.

Results

We analyzed 845 consecutive adult cardiac cases. Group B patients had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality compared with Group A (1.9% vs 1.2%, P < .001), and this effect was amplified for Group C patients (2.2%, P < .001). Postoperative length of stay was lowest for Group A patients (5.2 days) compared with Group B (6.6 days, P < .001) and Group C (7.0 days, P < .001). Overall complications rates were low, although Group A patients experienced lower rates of prolonged ventilation (3.5%) compared with Group B (6.5%, P = .04) and Group C (9.2%, P = .004). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed that DO2 above threshold was associated with significantly reduced rates of prolonged ventilation and postoperative length of stay. Other outcomes were similar between groups.

Conclusions

Even a single DO2 value below threshold was associated with excess prolonged ventilation and postoperative length of stay, but not other outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肺旁路供氧试验及主要临床结果
背景:体外循环低氧输送(DO2)与急性肾损伤有关。我们试图确定术中DO2、术后住院时间和术后主要事件之间的关系。方法845例患者起始后,每隔30 min计算一次do2值。DO2 <泵流量增加;280 mL O2/min/m2,但护理未作其他调整。根据DO2值将患者回顾性分为3组:A组,所有读数≥280 mL O2/min/m2;B组≥1次读数<;280 mL O2/min/m2;C组,≥2个读数& 280 mL O2/min/m2。分析患者预后。结果我们分析了845例连续的成人心脏病例。与a组相比,B组患者胸外科学会预测的死亡风险更高(1.9% vs 1.2%, P <;.001), C组患者的这种效应被放大(2.2%,P <;措施)。A组患者术后住院时间最短,为5.2天,B组患者为6.6天,P <;.001)和C组(7.0天,P <;措施)。总体并发症发生率较低,但A组患者的延长通气率(3.5%)低于B组(6.5%,P = 0.04)和C组(9.2%,P = 0.004)。多变量回归分析证实,DO2高于阈值与延长通气率和术后住院时间显著降低相关。两组之间的其他结果相似。结论单次DO2值低于阈值与过度延长通气时间和术后住院时间有关,但与其他结局无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Contents No-Touch Saphenous Vein Graft vs Radial Artery as an I-Composite Graft From the Right Internal Mammary Artery Zero-Heat Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting Using Water Jet: An Experimental Study Do Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery Differ by Preoperative Status and Socioeconomic Deprivation? Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Patient With an Occluded Abdominal Aorta Supported by Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1