Human Applications of the Anstadt Cup: Implications for Non–Blood-Contacting Biventricular Support

Mark P. Anstadt MD , Krish C. Dewan MD , R. Anthony Perez-Tamayo MD, PhD , Deborah L. Conley BSN , Peter Van Trigt MD , Carmelo A. Milano MD
{"title":"Human Applications of the Anstadt Cup: Implications for Non–Blood-Contacting Biventricular Support","authors":"Mark P. Anstadt MD ,&nbsp;Krish C. Dewan MD ,&nbsp;R. Anthony Perez-Tamayo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Deborah L. Conley BSN ,&nbsp;Peter Van Trigt MD ,&nbsp;Carmelo A. Milano MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.05.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Direct mechanical ventricular actuation (DMVA) with the Anstadt cup is effective for non–blood-contacting biventricular support. Pneumatic regulation of a silicone device augments ventricular pump function. Vacuum attachment facilitates diastolic augmentation critical for biventricular support. This report reviews outcomes in patients supported for bridge to transplantation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DMVA was approved by the institutional review board at Duke University for refractory cardiogenic shock in potential candidates for heart transplantation. Devices with silicone membranes were controlled by pneumatic drive systems. Explanted hearts underwent extensive histologic examination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five patients met inclusion criteria. All exhibited immediate return of physiologic pulsatile flow and reduced pulmonary pressures during device insertion. Vasopressors, inotropes, and balloon pump support were discontinued at implantation or within 48 hours. Installation through left thoracotomy (n = 4) took &lt;5 minutes. Postcardiotomy support (n = 1) enabled routine decannulation. Support ranged from 2 to 84 days. Long-term survivors (n = 2) received 2 days of DMVA bridging to heart transplantation and 7.5 days of DMVA for acute myocarditis. There were no device-related complications. An expert cardiovascular pathologist found no evidence of device-related myocardial trauma or injury (n = 4) and no adverse effects on bypass grafts (n = 1). Recovery was deemed futile (n = 3) after diffuse cerebral emboli from prior aortic cross-clamp and extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation and for preexisting sepsis leading to end-organ failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DMVA with the Anstadt cup effectively supported the failing or arrested heart in humans without adverse cardiac effects. Unique diastolic augmentation, return of physiologic pulsatile flow, and no blood contact contribute to device efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 842-847"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Direct mechanical ventricular actuation (DMVA) with the Anstadt cup is effective for non–blood-contacting biventricular support. Pneumatic regulation of a silicone device augments ventricular pump function. Vacuum attachment facilitates diastolic augmentation critical for biventricular support. This report reviews outcomes in patients supported for bridge to transplantation.

Methods

DMVA was approved by the institutional review board at Duke University for refractory cardiogenic shock in potential candidates for heart transplantation. Devices with silicone membranes were controlled by pneumatic drive systems. Explanted hearts underwent extensive histologic examination.

Results

Five patients met inclusion criteria. All exhibited immediate return of physiologic pulsatile flow and reduced pulmonary pressures during device insertion. Vasopressors, inotropes, and balloon pump support were discontinued at implantation or within 48 hours. Installation through left thoracotomy (n = 4) took <5 minutes. Postcardiotomy support (n = 1) enabled routine decannulation. Support ranged from 2 to 84 days. Long-term survivors (n = 2) received 2 days of DMVA bridging to heart transplantation and 7.5 days of DMVA for acute myocarditis. There were no device-related complications. An expert cardiovascular pathologist found no evidence of device-related myocardial trauma or injury (n = 4) and no adverse effects on bypass grafts (n = 1). Recovery was deemed futile (n = 3) after diffuse cerebral emboli from prior aortic cross-clamp and extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation and for preexisting sepsis leading to end-organ failure.

Conclusions

DMVA with the Anstadt cup effectively supported the failing or arrested heart in humans without adverse cardiac effects. Unique diastolic augmentation, return of physiologic pulsatile flow, and no blood contact contribute to device efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安氏杯的人体应用:非血液接触式双心室支持的意义
直接机械心室驱动(DMVA)与安施塔特杯是有效的非血液接触双心室支持。硅胶装置的气动调节增强了心室泵的功能。真空附着有利于舒张增强,这对双心室支持至关重要。本报告回顾了接受移植治疗的患者的预后。方法sdmva被杜克大学机构审查委员会批准用于难治性心源性休克的潜在心脏移植候选人。硅胶膜装置由气动驱动系统控制。移植的心脏进行了广泛的组织学检查。结果5例患者符合纳入标准。在装置插入期间,所有患者均表现出生理性脉搏流量的立即恢复和肺压力的降低。血管加压药、肌力药物和球囊泵支持在植入时或48小时内停用。左侧开胸安装(n = 4)耗时5分钟。开心术后支持(n = 1)启用常规脱管。支持时间从2天到84天不等。长期存活者(n = 2)接受2天的DMVA桥接心脏移植,7.5天的DMVA治疗急性心肌炎。无器械相关并发症。一位心血管病理学专家未发现器械相关心肌创伤或损伤的证据(n = 4),旁路移植无不良反应(n = 1)。先前主动脉交叉钳夹和延长心肺复苏导致弥漫性脑栓塞以及先前存在的败血症导致终末器官衰竭后,认为恢复无效(n = 3)。结论sdmva配合安施塔特杯可有效支撑衰竭或骤停心脏,无不良心脏反应。独特的舒张增强,恢复生理性搏动流量,无血液接触有助于装置的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Contents Trends in Surgery for Endocarditis: 15-Year Experience From a Statewide Quality Collaborative Concomitant Tricuspid Annuloplasty During Mitral Surgery: Becoming an Unpopular Practice? Evolution of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: 30-Year Experience From a High-Volume Center National Midterm Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1