Impact of the educational setting on the teaching and learning of the equine distal limb ultrasonography

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1002/ase.2475
Pollyanna Stremel Romeiro, Saulo Henrique Weber, Edson José Justino, Pedro Vicente Michelotto
{"title":"Impact of the educational setting on the teaching and learning of the equine distal limb ultrasonography","authors":"Pollyanna Stremel Romeiro,&nbsp;Saulo Henrique Weber,&nbsp;Edson José Justino,&nbsp;Pedro Vicente Michelotto","doi":"10.1002/ase.2475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of immersive methodologies is a trend in the educational environment, but their outcomes in the teaching–learning process need to be better understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of the educational environment on learning equine distal limb ultrasonography, comparing immersive classroom, traditional classroom, and virtual classroom. A total of 153 veterinary medicine students from the first to the third semester participated in this study. The students were divided into four groups: traditional (<i>n</i> = 22), immersive (<i>n</i> = 100), online (<i>n</i> = 31), and traditional-immersive (<i>n</i> = 15). The students completed a questionnaire before and immediately after the class. The online group had a lower average gain in correct answers compared to the others (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Regarding student perception, it was observed that the virtual group had the lowest satisfaction score (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and students in the immersive and online environments were more satisfied with the resources used compared to the traditional classroom (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Concluding, in the present study students showed a greater interest in environments associated with technology, and that in-person modalities resulted in significantly superior learning outcomes compared to online ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"17 6","pages":"1275-1282"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of immersive methodologies is a trend in the educational environment, but their outcomes in the teaching–learning process need to be better understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of the educational environment on learning equine distal limb ultrasonography, comparing immersive classroom, traditional classroom, and virtual classroom. A total of 153 veterinary medicine students from the first to the third semester participated in this study. The students were divided into four groups: traditional (n = 22), immersive (n = 100), online (n = 31), and traditional-immersive (n = 15). The students completed a questionnaire before and immediately after the class. The online group had a lower average gain in correct answers compared to the others (p < 0.01). Regarding student perception, it was observed that the virtual group had the lowest satisfaction score (p < 0.001), and students in the immersive and online environments were more satisfied with the resources used compared to the traditional classroom (p = 0.01). Concluding, in the present study students showed a greater interest in environments associated with technology, and that in-person modalities resulted in significantly superior learning outcomes compared to online ones.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学环境对马远端肢体超声波检查教学的影响。
使用沉浸式教学法是教育环境中的一种趋势,但其在教学过程中的结果需要更好地理解。本研究旨在通过比较沉浸式课堂、传统课堂和虚拟课堂,评估教育环境对学习马远端肢体超声造影术的影响。共有 153 名第一至第三学期的兽医专业学生参与了本研究。学生被分为四组:传统组(22 人)、沉浸组(100 人)、在线组(31 人)和传统-沉浸组(15 人)。学生们在课前和课后立即填写了一份问卷。与其他小组相比,在线小组的平均正确率较低(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Incorporating structured metacognitive training into an undergraduate anatomy classroom. Focused anatomy workshops for clerkships and the USMLE Step 1 examination. Teaching human anatomy before during and after COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study on kinesiology students' performance, cognitive load, and congruent embodied learning. Refocusing graduate gross anatomy training: Curating future content experts. Anatomical Sciences Education Vol. 17, Issue 8, 2024 Cover Image
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1