Evaluation of an electronic health record Drug Interaction Customization Editor (DICE).

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1093/ajhp/zxae169
Andrew Romero, Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras, Lorenzo Villa-Zapata, Malinda Tan, John Horn, Daniel C Malone
{"title":"Evaluation of an electronic health record Drug Interaction Customization Editor (DICE).","authors":"Andrew Romero, Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras, Lorenzo Villa-Zapata, Malinda Tan, John Horn, Daniel C Malone","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the low specificity of drug-drug interaction (DDI) warnings, hospitals and healthcare systems would benefit from the ability to customize alerts, thereby reducing the burden of alerts while simultaneously preventing harm. We developed a tool, called the Drug Interaction Customization Editor (DICE), as a prototype to identify features and functionality that could assist healthcare organizations in customizing DDI alerts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team of pharmacists, physicians, and DDI experts identified attributes expected to be useful for filtering DDI warnings. A survey was sent to pharmacists with informatics responsibilities and other medication safety committee members to obtain their opinions about the tool. The survey asked participants to evaluate the 4 sections of the DICE tool (General, Medication, Patient, and Visit) on a scale ranging from 0 (not useful) to 100 (very useful). The survey provided an opportunity for participants to express their opinions on the overall usefulness of the DICE tool and to provide other comments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 50 survey respondents were mainly pharmacists (n = 47, 94%) with almost half (n = 23, 47%) having health information technology/informatics training. Most respondents (n = 33, 80%) were employed by organizations with over 350 beds. Respondents indicated the most useful features of the DICE tool were the ability to filter DDI warnings based on routes of administrations (mean [SD] rating scale score, 86.5 [21.6]), primary drug properties (85.7 [20.5]), patient attributes (85.6 [16.7]) and laboratory attributes (88.8 [18.0]). The overall impression of the DICE tool was rated at 82.8 (19.0), and when asked about the potential to reduce DDI alerts, respondents rated the tool at 83.7 (21.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to customize DDI alerts using data elements currently within the electronic health records (EHRs) has the potential to decrease alert fatigue and override rates. This prototype DICE tool could be used by end users and vendors as a template for developing a more advanced DDI filtering tool within EHR systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1142-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the low specificity of drug-drug interaction (DDI) warnings, hospitals and healthcare systems would benefit from the ability to customize alerts, thereby reducing the burden of alerts while simultaneously preventing harm. We developed a tool, called the Drug Interaction Customization Editor (DICE), as a prototype to identify features and functionality that could assist healthcare organizations in customizing DDI alerts.

Methods: A team of pharmacists, physicians, and DDI experts identified attributes expected to be useful for filtering DDI warnings. A survey was sent to pharmacists with informatics responsibilities and other medication safety committee members to obtain their opinions about the tool. The survey asked participants to evaluate the 4 sections of the DICE tool (General, Medication, Patient, and Visit) on a scale ranging from 0 (not useful) to 100 (very useful). The survey provided an opportunity for participants to express their opinions on the overall usefulness of the DICE tool and to provide other comments.

Results: The 50 survey respondents were mainly pharmacists (n = 47, 94%) with almost half (n = 23, 47%) having health information technology/informatics training. Most respondents (n = 33, 80%) were employed by organizations with over 350 beds. Respondents indicated the most useful features of the DICE tool were the ability to filter DDI warnings based on routes of administrations (mean [SD] rating scale score, 86.5 [21.6]), primary drug properties (85.7 [20.5]), patient attributes (85.6 [16.7]) and laboratory attributes (88.8 [18.0]). The overall impression of the DICE tool was rated at 82.8 (19.0), and when asked about the potential to reduce DDI alerts, respondents rated the tool at 83.7 (21.8).

Conclusion: The ability to customize DDI alerts using data elements currently within the electronic health records (EHRs) has the potential to decrease alert fatigue and override rates. This prototype DICE tool could be used by end users and vendors as a template for developing a more advanced DDI filtering tool within EHR systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估电子病历药物相互作用定制编辑器(DICE)。
免责声明:为了加快文章的出版速度,AJHP在接受稿件后会尽快在网上发布。被录用的稿件已经过同行评审和校对,但在进行技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。目的:由于药物相互作用(DDI)警告的特异性较低,医院和医疗系统将受益于定制警告的能力,从而减轻警告的负担,同时预防伤害。我们开发了一个名为 "药物相互作用定制编辑器"(DICE)的工具作为原型,以确定可帮助医疗机构定制 DDI 警报的特征和功能:由药剂师、医生和药物相互作用专家组成的团队确定了对筛选药物相互作用警告有用的属性。向负责信息学的药剂师和其他药物安全委员会成员发送了一份调查问卷,以了解他们对该工具的意见。调查要求参与者对 DICE 工具的 4 个部分(一般、用药、患者和就诊)进行评价,评分标准从 0(无用)到 100(非常有用)不等。调查让参与者有机会就 DICE 工具的总体有用性发表意见,并提供其他评论:50 名调查对象主要是药剂师(47 人,占 94%),其中近一半(23 人,占 47%)接受过卫生信息技术/信息学培训。大多数受访者(n = 33,80%)受雇于拥有 350 张以上床位的机构。受访者表示,DICE 工具最有用的功能是能够根据给药途径(平均[标度]评分表得分 86.5 [21.6])、主要药物属性(85.7 [20.5])、患者属性(85.6 [16.7])和实验室属性(88.8 [18.0])过滤 DDI 警告。受访者对 DICE 工具的总体印象评分为 82.8 (19.0),当问及减少 DDI 警报的潜力时,受访者对该工具的评分为 83.7 (21.8):结论:利用目前电子病历中的数据元素定制 DDI 警报的功能有可能降低警报疲劳和覆盖率。最终用户和供应商可将此 DICE 工具原型作为模板,在电子病历系统中开发更先进的 DDI 过滤工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
期刊最新文献
Recent and anticipated novel drug approvals (4Q 2024 through 3Q 2025). A call to action: Studying the shortened duration of ceftriaxone for inpatient management of acute uncomplicated cystitis. Impact of a pharmacist-led intervention on prostate cancer illness perception. Pharmacotherapy considerations for pediatric acute agitation management in the emergency department. Central lines, aseptic batching services, and infection rates: A pharmacy-led initiative of intravenous tube priming within a NICU.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1