Does selective intraoperative music reduce pain following abdominal wall reconstruction? A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Hernia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03092-y
Sara M Maskal, Corey K Gentle, Ryan C Ellis, Chao Tu, Michael J Rosen, Clayton C Petro, Benjamin T Miller, Lucas R A Beffa, Jenny H Chang, Nir Messer, Megan Melland-Smith, Johannes Jeekel, Ajita S Prabhu
{"title":"Does selective intraoperative music reduce pain following abdominal wall reconstruction? A double-blind randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Sara M Maskal, Corey K Gentle, Ryan C Ellis, Chao Tu, Michael J Rosen, Clayton C Petro, Benjamin T Miller, Lucas R A Beffa, Jenny H Chang, Nir Messer, Megan Melland-Smith, Johannes Jeekel, Ajita S Prabhu","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03092-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03092-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although intraoperative music is purported to mitigate postoperative pain after some procedures, its application has never been explored in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). We sought to determine whether intraoperative music would decrease early postoperative pain following AWR.

Methods: We conducted a placebo-controlled, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a single center between June 2022 and July 2023 including 321 adult patients undergoing open AWR with retromuscular mesh. Patients received noise-canceling headphones and were randomized 1:1 to patient-selected music or silence after induction, stratified by preoperative chronic opioid use. All patients received multimodal pain control. The primary outcome was pain (NRS-11) at 24 ± 3 h. The primary outcome was analyzed by linear regression with pre-specified covariates (chronic opioid use, hernia width, operative time, myofascial release, anxiety disorder diagnosis, and preoperative STAI-6 score).

Results: 178 patients were randomized to music, 164 of which were analyzed. 177 were randomized to silence, 157 of which were analyzed. At 24 ± 3 h postoperatively, there was no difference in the primary outcome of NRS-11 scores (5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46, p = 0.75). After adjusting for prespecified covariates, the difference of NRS-11 scores at 24 ± 3 h between the music and silence groups remained insignificant (p = 0.83). There was no difference in NRS-11 or STAI-6 scores at 48 ± 3 and 72 ± 3 h, intraoperative sedation, or postoperative narcotic usage.

Conclusion: For patients undergoing AWR, there was no benefit of intraoperative music over routine multimodal pain control for early postoperative pain reduction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05374096.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性术中音乐能减轻腹壁重建术后的疼痛吗?双盲随机对照试验
目的:虽然据称术中音乐可减轻某些手术后的术后疼痛,但在腹壁重建术(AWR)中的应用却从未被探索过。我们试图确定术中音乐是否能减轻腹壁重建术后早期疼痛:我们于 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 7 月在一个中心进行了一项安慰剂对照、患者、外科医生和评估者盲法的随机对照试验,包括 321 名接受腹壁重建术(open AWR)并使用再肌网的成年患者。患者均接受了降噪耳机,并在诱导后按 1:1 随机分配到患者自选的音乐或安静环境中,并根据术前长期使用阿片类药物的情况进行分层。所有患者都接受了多模式疼痛控制。主要结果是 24 ± 3 h 时的疼痛(NRS-11)。主要结果通过线性回归与预先指定的协变量(长期使用阿片类药物、疝气宽度、手术时间、肌筋膜松解、焦虑症诊断和术前 STAI-6 评分)进行分析:178名患者随机接受了音乐治疗,其中164人接受了分析。177名患者随机接受了静音治疗,其中157人接受了分析。术后 24±3 h,NRS-11 评分的主要结果无差异(5.18 ± 2.62 vs 5.27 ± 2.46,p = 0.75)。在对预设的协变量进行调整后,音乐组和沉默组在 24 ± 3 小时内的 NRS-11 评分差异仍然不显著(p = 0.83)。48±3小时和72±3小时时的NRS-11或STAI-6评分、术中镇静剂或术后麻醉剂使用量均无差异:结论:对于接受AWR手术的患者,术中音乐与常规的多模式疼痛控制相比,在术后早期减轻疼痛方面没有益处:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05374096。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
期刊最新文献
Complications related to the prehabilitation with preoperative pneumoperitoneum in loss of domain hernias: our experience in 180 consecutive cases. Navigating uncharted territory: robotic repair of a rare primary perineal hernia. Comment to: The effect of surgical repair of hiatal hernia (HH) on pulmonary function. Comment to: The modified frailty index predicts postoperative morbidity in elective hernia repair patients. The impact of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics on postoperative pain level, quality of life, and outcomes in ventral hernia repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1