Causal effects between gut microbiota and endometriosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1080/01443615.2024.2362415
Tiefeng Cao, Yunfei Wang, Shen Huimin
{"title":"Causal effects between gut microbiota and endometriosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study.","authors":"Tiefeng Cao, Yunfei Wang, Shen Huimin","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2024.2362415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous observational evidence has indicated the potential involvement of the gut microbiota (GM) in the development of endometriosis. However, the causal relationship of the association remains to be investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of GM was obtained from the MiBioGen consortium, and GWAS for endometriosis data was from the FinnGen consortium. Initially, a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was performed to identify specific bacteria associated with endometriosis. Inverse variance-weighted (IVW) was used as the main MR analysis to infer causal relationships. The other four popular MR methods including MR-Egger regression, weighted mode, weighted median, and simple mode were used for secondary confirmation. Subsequently, these selected bacteria were employed as exposure to investigate their causal effects on six sub-types of endometriosis. Furthermore, reverse MR analysis was implemented to evaluate the reverse causal effects. Cochran's Q statistics was used to test the heterogeneity of instrumental variables (IVs); MR-Egger regression was used to test horizontal pleiotropy; MR-PRESSO and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were applied to find significant outliers.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 1131 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were collected as IVs for 196 GM taxa with endometriosis as the outcome. We identified 12 causal relationships between endometriosis and GM taxa including 1 phylum, 3 families, 2 orders, and 6 genera (Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Eubacterium ruminantium group, Faecalibacterium, Peptococcus, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, and Ruminococcaceae UCG005). Utilizing the Bonferroni method, we identified phylum Cyanobacteria as the strongest associated GM taxa. Subsequently, 6 significant causal effects were uncovered between the 12 selected specific GM and 6 sub-types of endometriosis. Meanwhile, no reverse causal relationship was found. Further, no horizontal pleiotropy and no significant outliers were detected in the sensitive analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This MR analysis revealed significant causal effects between GM and endometriosis and phylum Cyanobacteria had the strongest association.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2024.2362415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous observational evidence has indicated the potential involvement of the gut microbiota (GM) in the development of endometriosis. However, the causal relationship of the association remains to be investigated.

Method: Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of GM was obtained from the MiBioGen consortium, and GWAS for endometriosis data was from the FinnGen consortium. Initially, a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was performed to identify specific bacteria associated with endometriosis. Inverse variance-weighted (IVW) was used as the main MR analysis to infer causal relationships. The other four popular MR methods including MR-Egger regression, weighted mode, weighted median, and simple mode were used for secondary confirmation. Subsequently, these selected bacteria were employed as exposure to investigate their causal effects on six sub-types of endometriosis. Furthermore, reverse MR analysis was implemented to evaluate the reverse causal effects. Cochran's Q statistics was used to test the heterogeneity of instrumental variables (IVs); MR-Egger regression was used to test horizontal pleiotropy; MR-PRESSO and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were applied to find significant outliers.

Result: A total of 1131 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were collected as IVs for 196 GM taxa with endometriosis as the outcome. We identified 12 causal relationships between endometriosis and GM taxa including 1 phylum, 3 families, 2 orders, and 6 genera (Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Eubacterium ruminantium group, Faecalibacterium, Peptococcus, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, and Ruminococcaceae UCG005). Utilizing the Bonferroni method, we identified phylum Cyanobacteria as the strongest associated GM taxa. Subsequently, 6 significant causal effects were uncovered between the 12 selected specific GM and 6 sub-types of endometriosis. Meanwhile, no reverse causal relationship was found. Further, no horizontal pleiotropy and no significant outliers were detected in the sensitive analysis.

Conclusions: This MR analysis revealed significant causal effects between GM and endometriosis and phylum Cyanobacteria had the strongest association.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道微生物群与子宫内膜异位症之间的因果效应:双样本孟德尔随机研究。
背景:以往的观察证据表明,肠道微生物群(GM)可能与子宫内膜异位症的发生有关。然而,这种关联的因果关系仍有待研究:子宫内膜异位症的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据来自MiBioGen联盟,子宫内膜异位症的GWAS数据来自FinnGen联盟。首先进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以确定与子宫内膜异位症相关的特定细菌。反方差加权(IVW)是主要的 MR 分析方法,用于推断因果关系。其他四种常用的 MR 方法包括 MR-Egger回归、加权模式、加权中位数和简单模式则用于辅助确认。随后,将这些选定的细菌作为暴露对象,研究它们对六种亚型子宫内膜异位症的因果影响。此外,还采用了反向 MR 分析来评估反向因果效应。科克伦 Q 统计用于检验工具变量(IVs)的异质性;MR-Egger 回归用于检验水平多效性;MR-PRESSO 和 leave-one-out 敏感性分析用于寻找显著的异常值:结果:在以子宫内膜异位症为结果的 196 个基因组分类群中,共收集了 1131 个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)作为 IV。我们确定了子宫内膜异位症与转基因类群之间的 12 种因果关系,包括 1 个门、3 个科、2 个目和 6 个属(Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group、Eubacterium ruminantium group、Faecalibacterium、Peptococcus、Clostridium sensu stricto 1 和 Ruminococcaceae UCG005)。利用 Bonferroni 方法,我们确定蓝藻门是与转基因相关性最强的类群。随后,我们发现 12 种选定的特定转基因生物与 6 种子宫内膜异位症亚型之间存在 6 种明显的因果关系。同时,没有发现反向因果关系。此外,在敏感性分析中未发现水平多效性和显著异常值:这项磁共振分析揭示了转基因与子宫内膜异位症之间的重要因果关系,其中蓝藻门与子宫内膜异位症的关联性最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
398
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between pre-pregnancy BMI and energy and macronutrients intakes during pregnancy in women from Yucatan, Mexico. How I maximised my training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Successful management of pyoderma gangrenosum after caesarean section: a case report. Prenatal MRI for the diagnosis of foetal pial arteriovenous fistula: a case report and literature review. Abnormal preoperative haematological parameters in Endometrial cancer; reflecting tumour aggressiveness or reduced response to radiotherapy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1