Performance of the clarus Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay prototype for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in serum.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Mycoses Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1111/myc.13756
Johannes Boyer, Sarah Sedik, Matthias Egger, Karl Dichtl, Juergen Prattes, Lisa Kriegl, Robert Krause, Florian Prüller, Martin Hoenigl
{"title":"Performance of the clarus Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay prototype for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in serum.","authors":"Johannes Boyer, Sarah Sedik, Matthias Egger, Karl Dichtl, Juergen Prattes, Lisa Kriegl, Robert Krause, Florian Prüller, Martin Hoenigl","doi":"10.1111/myc.13756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum galactomannan (GM) testing is essential for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis (IA), particularly in immunocompromised individuals. The global lack of on-site GM testing capacities necessitates cost-effective alternatives, such as .the clarus Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay prototype (clarus AGM prototype).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, cross-sectional study compared the diagnostic performance of the clarus AGM prototype (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) with the serological gold standard (=Platelia AGM assay; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Cocquette, France). IA was classified according to modified 2020 EORTC/MSG consensus and 2024 FUNDICU criteria. In total, 300 prospectively (May-Dec 2023) and retrospectively (2012-2015) collected samples were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 300 samples from 232 patients, 49 (16%) were classified as proven (n = 1) or probable IA (n = 48). In non-IA cases (n = 250), one patient was classified as possible IA. With the manufacturer recommended cut-off of ≥0.2, sensitivity and specificity of the clarus AGM prototype were 27% (13/49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15%-41%) and 99% (248/250; 95% CI: 97%-100%), respectively, while sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 79% when using the optimised Youden's cut-off of 0.0045 ODI. ROC curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.760-0.898) for the clarus AGM prototype in distinguishing between proven/probable IA and non-IA. The AUC for the Platelia AGM was 0.951 (95% CI: 0.909-994). Spearman's correlation analysis showed a weak correlation between the two assays (0.382; p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The weak correlation between the clarus AGM prototype and Platelia AGM highlights the need for further investigation into the clinical performance of the clarus AGM prototype, giving the different antigen epitopes addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"67 6","pages":"e13756"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serum galactomannan (GM) testing is essential for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis (IA), particularly in immunocompromised individuals. The global lack of on-site GM testing capacities necessitates cost-effective alternatives, such as .the clarus Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay prototype (clarus AGM prototype).

Methods: This single-centre, cross-sectional study compared the diagnostic performance of the clarus AGM prototype (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma) with the serological gold standard (=Platelia AGM assay; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Cocquette, France). IA was classified according to modified 2020 EORTC/MSG consensus and 2024 FUNDICU criteria. In total, 300 prospectively (May-Dec 2023) and retrospectively (2012-2015) collected samples were included.

Results: Among 300 samples from 232 patients, 49 (16%) were classified as proven (n = 1) or probable IA (n = 48). In non-IA cases (n = 250), one patient was classified as possible IA. With the manufacturer recommended cut-off of ≥0.2, sensitivity and specificity of the clarus AGM prototype were 27% (13/49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15%-41%) and 99% (248/250; 95% CI: 97%-100%), respectively, while sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 79% when using the optimised Youden's cut-off of 0.0045 ODI. ROC curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.760-0.898) for the clarus AGM prototype in distinguishing between proven/probable IA and non-IA. The AUC for the Platelia AGM was 0.951 (95% CI: 0.909-994). Spearman's correlation analysis showed a weak correlation between the two assays (0.382; p < .001).

Conclusions: The weak correlation between the clarus AGM prototype and Platelia AGM highlights the need for further investigation into the clinical performance of the clarus AGM prototype, giving the different antigen epitopes addressed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于诊断血清中侵袭性肺曲霉菌病的 clarus 曲霉菌半乳甘露聚糖酶免疫测定原型的性能。
背景:血清半乳甘露聚糖(GM)检测对于诊断侵袭性曲霉菌病(IA)至关重要,尤其是在免疫力低下的人群中。由于全球缺乏现场 GM 检测能力,因此需要成本效益高的替代方法,如 clarus 曲霉菌 GM 酶联免疫分析原型(clarus AGM 原型):这项单中心横断面研究比较了 clarus AGM 原型(IMMY,俄克拉荷马州诺曼市)与血清学金标准(=Platelia AGM 分析法;Bio-Rad,法国马恩斯拉科凯特市)的诊断性能。IA根据修订后的2020 EORTC/MSG共识和2024 FUNDICU标准进行分类。共纳入300份前瞻性(2023年5月至12月)和回顾性(2012年至2015年)采集的样本:结果:在来自 232 名患者的 300 份样本中,49 份(16%)被归类为已证实(n = 1)或可能的 IA(n = 48)。在非 IA 病例(n = 250)中,一名患者被归类为可能的 IA。采用制造商推荐的≥0.2临界值时,clarus AGM原型的灵敏度和特异性分别为27%(13/49;95%置信区间[CI]:15%-41%)和99%(248/250;95% CI:97%-100%),而采用优化的尤登临界值0.0045 ODI时,灵敏度和特异性分别为78%和79%。ROC曲线分析表明,clarus AGM原型在区分已证实/可能的IA和非IA方面的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.829(95% CI:0.760-0.898)。Platelia AGM 的 AUC 为 0.951(95% CI:0.909-994)。斯皮尔曼相关性分析表明,两种检测方法之间存在微弱的相关性(0.382;P 结论:两种检测方法之间存在微弱的相关性:clarus AGM 原型与 Platelia AGM 之间的弱相关性突出表明,有必要进一步研究 clarus AGM 原型的临床性能,以解决不同抗原表位的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
期刊最新文献
High-Resolution Melting Assay to Detect the Mutations That Cause the Y132F and G458S Substitutions at the ERG11 Gene Involved in Azole Resistance in Candida parapsilosis. First Reported Cases of Terbinafine-Resistant Trichophyton indotineae Isolates in Israel: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics and Response to Treatment. Multicentre Study of Candida parapsilosis Blood Isolates in Türkiye Highlights an Increasing Rate of Fluconazole Resistance and Emergence of Echinocandin and Multidrug Resistance. The In Vitro Activity of Rezafungin Against Uncommon Species of Candida. Detecting Echinocandin Resistance in C. glabrata Using Commercial Methods: Are CLSI or EUCAST Breakpoints Suitable for Categorical Classification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1