Development of a machine learning-based risk model for postoperative complications of lung cancer surgery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02878-y
Yuka Kadomatsu, Ryo Emoto, Yoko Kubo, Keita Nakanishi, Harushi Ueno, Taketo Kato, Shota Nakamura, Tetsuya Mizuno, Shigeyuki Matsui, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa
{"title":"Development of a machine learning-based risk model for postoperative complications of lung cancer surgery.","authors":"Yuka Kadomatsu, Ryo Emoto, Yoko Kubo, Keita Nakanishi, Harushi Ueno, Taketo Kato, Shota Nakamura, Tetsuya Mizuno, Shigeyuki Matsui, Toyofumi Fengshi Chen-Yoshikawa","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02878-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a comorbidity risk score specifically for lung resection surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent lung resections for lung cancer, and developed a risk model using data from 2014 to 2017 (training dataset), validated using data from 2018 to 2019 (validation dataset). Forty variables were analyzed, including 35 factors related to the patient's overall condition and five factors related to surgical techniques and tumor-related factors. The risk model for postoperative complications was developed using an elastic net regularized generalized linear model. The performance of the risk model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and compared with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of postoperative complications was 34.7% in the training dataset and 21.9% in the validation dataset. The final model consisted of 20 variables, including age, surgical-related factors, respiratory function tests, and comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of ischemic heart disease, and 12 blood test results. The area under the curve (AUC) for the developed risk model was 0.734, whereas the AUC for the CCI was 0.521 in the validation dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new machine learning model could predict postoperative complications with acceptable accuracy.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>2020-0375.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02878-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a comorbidity risk score specifically for lung resection surgeries.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent lung resections for lung cancer, and developed a risk model using data from 2014 to 2017 (training dataset), validated using data from 2018 to 2019 (validation dataset). Forty variables were analyzed, including 35 factors related to the patient's overall condition and five factors related to surgical techniques and tumor-related factors. The risk model for postoperative complications was developed using an elastic net regularized generalized linear model. The performance of the risk model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and compared with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

Results: The rate of postoperative complications was 34.7% in the training dataset and 21.9% in the validation dataset. The final model consisted of 20 variables, including age, surgical-related factors, respiratory function tests, and comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of ischemic heart disease, and 12 blood test results. The area under the curve (AUC) for the developed risk model was 0.734, whereas the AUC for the CCI was 0.521 in the validation dataset.

Conclusions: The new machine learning model could predict postoperative complications with acceptable accuracy.

Clinical registration number: 2020-0375.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发基于机器学习的肺癌术后并发症风险模型。
目的:开发一种专门针对肺切除手术的合并症风险评分:我们查阅了肺癌肺切除术患者的病历,利用 2014 年至 2017 年的数据(训练数据集)开发了一个风险模型,并利用 2018 年至 2019 年的数据(验证数据集)进行了验证。分析了40个变量,包括与患者整体情况相关的35个因素,以及与手术技术和肿瘤相关因素相关的5个因素。术后并发症风险模型是利用弹性网正则化广义线性模型建立的。使用接收者操作特征曲线对风险模型的性能进行了评估,并与夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)进行了比较:结果:训练数据集的术后并发症发生率为 34.7%,验证数据集为 21.9%。最终模型由 20 个变量组成,包括年龄、手术相关因素、呼吸功能测试、慢性阻塞性肺病等合并症、缺血性心脏病史和 12 项血液检测结果。开发的风险模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.734,而验证数据集中CCI的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.521:结论:新的机器学习模型可以预测术后并发症,其准确性可以接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Is the use of direct oral anticoagulants after non-cardiac thoracic surgery safe for patients? Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery. Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Development of a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy simulator: Sigmaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1