Living Kidney Donation: A Narrative Review of Mid- and Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000005094
Emma K Massey, Andrew D Rule, Arthur J Matas
{"title":"Living Kidney Donation: A Narrative Review of Mid- and Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes.","authors":"Emma K Massey, Andrew D Rule, Arthur J Matas","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Living kidney donors make a significant contribution to alleviating the organ shortage. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of mid- and long-term (≥12 mo) living donor psychosocial outcomes and highlight areas that have been understudied and should be immediately addressed in both research and clinical practice. We conducted a narrative review by searching 3 databases. A total of 206 articles were included. Living donors can be divided into those who donate to an emotionally or genetically related person, the so-called directed donors, or to an emotionally or genetically unrelated recipient, the so-called nondirected donors. The most commonly investigated (bio)psychosocial outcome after living donation was health-related quality of life. Other generic (bio)psychological outcomes include specific aspects of mental health such as depression, and fatigue and pain. Social outcomes include financial and employment burdens and problems with insurance. Donation-specific psychosocial outcomes include regret, satisfaction, feelings of abandonment and unmet needs, and benefits of living kidney donation. The experience of living donation is complex and multifaceted, reflected in the co-occurrence of both benefits and burden after donation. Noticeably, no interventions have been developed to improve mid- or long-term psychosocial outcomes among living donors. We highlight areas for methodological improvement and identified 3 areas requiring immediate attention from the transplant community in both research and clinical care: (1) recognizing and providing care for the minority of donors who have poorer long-term psychosocial outcomes after donation, (2) minimizing donation-related financial burden, and (3) studying interventions to minimize long-term psychosocial problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"259-272"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living kidney donors make a significant contribution to alleviating the organ shortage. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of mid- and long-term (≥12 mo) living donor psychosocial outcomes and highlight areas that have been understudied and should be immediately addressed in both research and clinical practice. We conducted a narrative review by searching 3 databases. A total of 206 articles were included. Living donors can be divided into those who donate to an emotionally or genetically related person, the so-called directed donors, or to an emotionally or genetically unrelated recipient, the so-called nondirected donors. The most commonly investigated (bio)psychosocial outcome after living donation was health-related quality of life. Other generic (bio)psychological outcomes include specific aspects of mental health such as depression, and fatigue and pain. Social outcomes include financial and employment burdens and problems with insurance. Donation-specific psychosocial outcomes include regret, satisfaction, feelings of abandonment and unmet needs, and benefits of living kidney donation. The experience of living donation is complex and multifaceted, reflected in the co-occurrence of both benefits and burden after donation. Noticeably, no interventions have been developed to improve mid- or long-term psychosocial outcomes among living donors. We highlight areas for methodological improvement and identified 3 areas requiring immediate attention from the transplant community in both research and clinical care: (1) recognizing and providing care for the minority of donors who have poorer long-term psychosocial outcomes after donation, (2) minimizing donation-related financial burden, and (3) studying interventions to minimize long-term psychosocial problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肾脏捐赠:中期和长期社会心理结果的叙述性回顾。
活体肾脏捐献者为缓解器官短缺做出了重大贡献。本文旨在概述中期和长期(≥12 个月)活体肾脏捐献者的社会心理结果,并强调尚未得到充分研究的领域,这些领域应立即在研究和临床实践中加以解决。我们通过检索 3 个数据库进行了叙述性综述。共纳入 206 篇文章。活体捐献者可分为向情感或基因相关的人捐献者(即所谓的定向捐献者)和向情感或基因无关的受捐者捐献者(即所谓的非定向捐献者)。活体捐献后最常调查的(生物)社会心理结果是与健康相关的生活质量。其他一般(生物)心理结果包括心理健康的特定方面,如抑郁、疲劳和疼痛。社会结果包括经济和就业负担以及保险问题。与捐献相关的社会心理结果包括遗憾、满意、被遗弃感和未满足的需求,以及活体肾脏捐献的益处。活体捐献的经历是复杂和多方面的,体现在捐献后的益处和负担并存。值得注意的是,目前尚无干预措施来改善活体捐献者的中期或长期社会心理结果。我们强调了需要改进方法的领域,并确定了需要移植界在研究和临床护理方面立即关注的三个领域:(1) 认识到少数捐献者在捐献后的长期社会心理结果较差,并为其提供护理;(2) 尽量减少与捐献相关的经济负担;(3) 研究干预措施,以尽量减少长期社会心理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
期刊最新文献
Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Amyloidosis: US National Database Study. All Cloak and No Dagger? Immunosuppression-free Lung Transplantation by Sustained Knockdown of Major Histocompatibility Complex Expression in the Graft. Metabolic Flexibility Predicts Response to Saroglitazar in Liver Transplant Recipients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease. Organ Transplantation in India: INDEED, for the Common Good! Photoacoustic Tomography Assessments During Ex Vivo Normothermic Perfusion. A Novel and Noninvasive Modality to Evaluate Endothelial Integrity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1