Influence of donor age, sex and ethnicity on high-titre anti-A and -B: Review of 6 million donations from two national blood providers.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1111/vox.13697
Melanie Robbins, Sian Huish, Alexandra Griffiths, Tanya Powley, James Daly, Rebecca Cardigan
{"title":"Influence of donor age, sex and ethnicity on high-titre anti-A and -B: Review of 6 million donations from two national blood providers.","authors":"Melanie Robbins, Sian Huish, Alexandra Griffiths, Tanya Powley, James Daly, Rebecca Cardigan","doi":"10.1111/vox.13697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Some blood operators routinely screen blood donations for high-titre (HT) anti-A/B to reduce the risk of a haemolytic transfusion reaction due to out-of-group plasma-rich components. We assessed donor factors associated with an increased likelihood of screening positive and compared routine data between England and Australia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were assessed from HT screening during 2018-2020 in Australia and 2018-2021 in England, totalling nearly 6 million blood donations. Screening was performed using a Beckman Coulter PK7300 analyser with a micro-titre plate saline direct agglutination test in both countries, although different reagent red cells were chosen. HT-positive was defined as testing positive at a titre of 128 or above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The likelihood of a donor testing HT-positive was greater for females than males, declined with age and was dependent on the ABO group. However, the proportion of donors testing HT-positive was consistently higher in Australia than in England: overall, 14% of group O donations and 5% of group A donations in England tested HT-positive, compared with 51% and 22%, respectively in Australia. English data also showed that donors from Black, Asian or mixed ethnic backgrounds were more likely to test HT-positive than White donors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data demonstrate that donor sex, age, ABO group and ethnicity affect the likelihood of testing HT-positive. Differences in testing methods likely had a significant impact on the proportion of donors testing as HT-positive or -negative rather than any differences in donor populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":"987-995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Some blood operators routinely screen blood donations for high-titre (HT) anti-A/B to reduce the risk of a haemolytic transfusion reaction due to out-of-group plasma-rich components. We assessed donor factors associated with an increased likelihood of screening positive and compared routine data between England and Australia.

Materials and methods: Data were assessed from HT screening during 2018-2020 in Australia and 2018-2021 in England, totalling nearly 6 million blood donations. Screening was performed using a Beckman Coulter PK7300 analyser with a micro-titre plate saline direct agglutination test in both countries, although different reagent red cells were chosen. HT-positive was defined as testing positive at a titre of 128 or above.

Results: The likelihood of a donor testing HT-positive was greater for females than males, declined with age and was dependent on the ABO group. However, the proportion of donors testing HT-positive was consistently higher in Australia than in England: overall, 14% of group O donations and 5% of group A donations in England tested HT-positive, compared with 51% and 22%, respectively in Australia. English data also showed that donors from Black, Asian or mixed ethnic backgrounds were more likely to test HT-positive than White donors.

Conclusion: These data demonstrate that donor sex, age, ABO group and ethnicity affect the likelihood of testing HT-positive. Differences in testing methods likely had a significant impact on the proportion of donors testing as HT-positive or -negative rather than any differences in donor populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
献血者年龄、性别和种族对高滴度抗-A 和抗-B 的影响:对两个国家血液提供者 600 万次献血的回顾。
背景和目的:一些血液经营者会对献血者进行高滴度(HT)抗 A/B 血型筛查,以降低因组外富含血浆成分而发生溶血性输血反应的风险。我们评估了与筛查阳性可能性增加相关的献血者因素,并比较了英格兰和澳大利亚的常规数据:对澳大利亚 2018-2020 年和英格兰 2018-2021 年期间的 HT 筛查数据进行了评估,共计近 600 万次献血。两国均使用贝克曼库尔特 PK7300 分析仪和微滴定板盐水直接凝集试验进行筛查,但选用的试剂红细胞不同。HT阳性的定义是滴度在128或以上:结果:女性捐献者检测出 HT 阳性的可能性大于男性,随着年龄的增长而下降,并且取决于 ABO 组别。不过,澳大利亚检测出 HT 阳性的捐献者比例一直高于英格兰:总体而言,英格兰有 14% 的 O 组捐献者和 5% 的 A 组捐献者检测出 HT 阳性,而澳大利亚分别为 51% 和 22%。英格兰的数据还显示,来自黑人、亚裔或混血背景的捐献者比白人捐献者更有可能检测出 HT 阳性:这些数据表明,捐献者的性别、年龄、ABO 血型和种族会影响 HT 检测呈阳性的可能性。检测方法的不同很可能对检测为 HT 阳性或阴性的供体比例产生重大影响,而不是供体人群的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
期刊最新文献
Isolation and analysis of residual leucocytes from leucoreduced red blood cell units. Removing upper age restrictions for returning donors and increasing the new donor upper age: Novel adverse event findings using a comprehensive donor vigilance system in Australia. Effects of blood donor characteristics and storage on red blood cell haemoglobin β S-nitrosylation. Has the switch to sexual risk behaviour screening impacted deferrals for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis therapy for human immunodeficiency virus? Missed opportunities: Lack of a diagnostic workup of anaemia results in a high prevalence of unidentified anaemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1