The effect of non-immersive virtual reality radiographic positioning simulation on first-year radiography students’ image evaluation performance

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.05.011
E.M. Miller , K.K. Schmid , B.M. Abbey
{"title":"The effect of non-immersive virtual reality radiographic positioning simulation on first-year radiography students’ image evaluation performance","authors":"E.M. Miller ,&nbsp;K.K. Schmid ,&nbsp;B.M. Abbey","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Optimal radiographic image quality is critical because it affects the accuracy of the reporter's interpretation. Radiographers have an ethical obligation to obtain quality diagnostic images while protecting patients from unnecessary radiation, including minimizing rejected and repeated images. Repeated imaging due to positioning errors have increased in recent years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality (VR) simulation on first-year students' evaluation of positioning errors on resultant knee and lumbar spine images. Crossover intervention design was used to deliver radiographic image evaluation instruction through traditional lecture and guided simulation using non-immersive VR to 33 first-year radiography students at a single academic institution located across four geographic program locations. Pre- and post-test knowledge assessments examined participants’ ability to recognize positioning errors on multiple-choice and essay questions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Raw mean scores increased on multiple choice questions across the entire cohort for the knee (M = 0.82, SD = 3.38) and lumbar spine (M = 2.91, SD = 3.69) but there was no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.60). Essay questions reported very minimal to no raw mean score increases for the knee (M = 0.27, SD = 2.78) and lumbar spine (M = 0.00, SD = 2.55), with no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.72).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Guided simulation instruction was shown to be as effective as traditional lecture. Results also suggest that novice learners better recognize image evaluation errors and corrections from a list of options but have not yet achieved the level of competence needed to independently evaluate radiographic images for diagnostic criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Non-immersive VR simulation is an effective tool for image evaluation instruction. VR increases access to authentic image evaluation practice by providing a simulated resultant image based off the students’ applied positioning skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Optimal radiographic image quality is critical because it affects the accuracy of the reporter's interpretation. Radiographers have an ethical obligation to obtain quality diagnostic images while protecting patients from unnecessary radiation, including minimizing rejected and repeated images. Repeated imaging due to positioning errors have increased in recent years.

Methods

This study evaluated the effectiveness of non-immersive virtual reality (VR) simulation on first-year students' evaluation of positioning errors on resultant knee and lumbar spine images. Crossover intervention design was used to deliver radiographic image evaluation instruction through traditional lecture and guided simulation using non-immersive VR to 33 first-year radiography students at a single academic institution located across four geographic program locations. Pre- and post-test knowledge assessments examined participants’ ability to recognize positioning errors on multiple-choice and essay questions.

Results

Raw mean scores increased on multiple choice questions across the entire cohort for the knee (M = 0.82, SD = 3.38) and lumbar spine (M = 2.91, SD = 3.69) but there was no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.60). Essay questions reported very minimal to no raw mean score increases for the knee (M = 0.27, SD = 2.78) and lumbar spine (M = 0.00, SD = 2.55), with no significant difference in performance by instructional method (p = 0.72).

Conclusion

Guided simulation instruction was shown to be as effective as traditional lecture. Results also suggest that novice learners better recognize image evaluation errors and corrections from a list of options but have not yet achieved the level of competence needed to independently evaluate radiographic images for diagnostic criteria.

Implications for practice

Non-immersive VR simulation is an effective tool for image evaluation instruction. VR increases access to authentic image evaluation practice by providing a simulated resultant image based off the students’ applied positioning skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非沉浸式虚拟现实放射定位模拟对放射学一年级学生图像评估成绩的影响。
介绍:最佳的放射影像质量至关重要,因为它影响到报告者判读的准确性。放射技师有道德义务获得高质量的诊断图像,同时保护患者免受不必要的辐射,包括尽量减少拒收和重复成像。近年来,由于定位错误而导致的重复成像有所增加:本研究评估了非沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)模拟对一年级学生评估定位误差对膝关节和腰椎影像结果的影响。该研究采用交叉干预设计,通过传统讲课和非沉浸式虚拟现实模拟指导的方式,向位于四个地理项目地点的一所学术机构的 33 名放射摄影专业一年级学生提供放射影像评估指导。测试前和测试后的知识评估考察了参与者在多项选择题和作文题中识别定位错误的能力:所有学员在膝关节(M = 0.82,SD = 3.38)和腰椎(M = 2.91,SD = 3.69)多项选择题上的原始平均分均有所提高,但不同教学方法下的成绩差异不大(p = 0.60)。作文题在膝关节(M = 0.27,SD = 2.78)和腰椎(M = 0.00,SD = 2.55)方面的原始平均分增加极少或没有增加,不同教学方法的成绩没有显著差异(P = 0.72):结论:指导性模拟教学与传统讲授法一样有效。结果还表明,新手学员能更好地识别图像评估错误,并从选项列表中进行纠正,但尚未达到独立评估放射图像诊断标准所需的能力水平:非沉浸式 VR 模拟是图像评估教学的有效工具。VR 可根据学生应用的定位技能提供模拟结果图像,从而增加获得真实图像评估练习的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
An enquiry into the usefulness of an information portal for Deaf and hard of hearing people prior to x-ray examinations and improvement ideas Morphometry-based radiomics for predicting prognosis in soft tissue sarcomas of extremities following radiotherapy Virtual reality simulation for mastery learning of wrist radiograph technique An initial exploration of factors that may impact radiographer performance in reporting mammograms Diagnostic radiography workforce expectations of learners against the 2023 HCPC standards of proficiency: Results of a UK Delphi study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1