Hospitalized Adolescents' Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Discussions.

Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2023-007606
Vanessa McFadden, Kelsey Porada, Nicole Emlen, Michelle L Pickett, Katherine Quinn
{"title":"Hospitalized Adolescents' Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Discussions.","authors":"Vanessa McFadden, Kelsey Porada, Nicole Emlen, Michelle L Pickett, Katherine Quinn","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2023-007606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Experts recommend that providers discuss adolescent patients' sexual and reproductive health (SRH) at any health care encounter, including hospitalizations. The purpose of this qualitative study was to gain insight into hospitalized adolescents' experiences and perspectives on SRH discussions (SHDs) to better inform patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Private semistructured interviews were conducted with hospitalized adolescents aged 13 to 17 years. Interviews were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were developed through an iterative process with focus on the primary research aim.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants were interviewed with a median age of 15.4 years. Adolescents expressed a range of preferences related to SHDs with providers. Themes included (1) experiences discussing SRH with providers, (2) SHDs during hospitalization, (3) communication preferences, and (4) perceptions of why providers initiate SHDs. Viewpoints about SHDs during hospitalizations varied, including that they addressed unmet needs, as well as that they seemed irrelevant to some participants. Aspects that facilitate SHDs include brevity with relevant depth, nonjudgmental provider demeanor, and reassurance of privacy. Some participants believed providers could judge the depth of discussion needed on the basis of the adolescent's age or personality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights variation in adolescents' preferences around SHDs with health care providers. Providers should initiate SHDs with statements of purpose and confidentiality. Given the variation in adolescents' perspectives, tools to privately collect self-reported behaviors before an SHD may help providers frame the conversation to the adolescent's specific SRH needs and communication style preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2023-007606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Experts recommend that providers discuss adolescent patients' sexual and reproductive health (SRH) at any health care encounter, including hospitalizations. The purpose of this qualitative study was to gain insight into hospitalized adolescents' experiences and perspectives on SRH discussions (SHDs) to better inform patient-centered care.

Methods: Private semistructured interviews were conducted with hospitalized adolescents aged 13 to 17 years. Interviews were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes were developed through an iterative process with focus on the primary research aim.

Results: Twenty participants were interviewed with a median age of 15.4 years. Adolescents expressed a range of preferences related to SHDs with providers. Themes included (1) experiences discussing SRH with providers, (2) SHDs during hospitalization, (3) communication preferences, and (4) perceptions of why providers initiate SHDs. Viewpoints about SHDs during hospitalizations varied, including that they addressed unmet needs, as well as that they seemed irrelevant to some participants. Aspects that facilitate SHDs include brevity with relevant depth, nonjudgmental provider demeanor, and reassurance of privacy. Some participants believed providers could judge the depth of discussion needed on the basis of the adolescent's age or personality.

Conclusions: This study highlights variation in adolescents' preferences around SHDs with health care providers. Providers should initiate SHDs with statements of purpose and confidentiality. Given the variation in adolescents' perspectives, tools to privately collect self-reported behaviors before an SHD may help providers frame the conversation to the adolescent's specific SRH needs and communication style preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院青少年对性健康和生殖健康讨论的看法。
目的:专家建议医疗服务提供者在包括住院在内的任何医疗服务中讨论青少年患者的性与生殖健康(SRH)问题。本定性研究旨在深入了解住院青少年在性与生殖健康讨论(SHDs)中的经历和观点,从而更好地提供以患者为中心的医疗服务:对住院的 13-17 岁青少年进行了私人半结构式访谈。采用主题分析法对访谈内容进行编码和分析。结果:20 名参与者接受了访谈,他们的平均年龄为 13 至 17 岁:20 名参与者接受了访谈,年龄中位数为 15.4 岁。青少年表达了他们与服务提供者之间有关社会性自主发展的各种偏好。主题包括:(1)与医疗服务提供者讨论性健康和生殖健康的经历;(2)住院期间的SHD;(3)沟通偏好;(4)对医疗服务提供者发起SHD的原因的看法。对于住院期间的社康指导,参与者的观点不尽相同,有的认为社康指导解决了未满足的需求,有的则认为社康指导与某些参与者无关。有利于开展 SHD 的方面包括:简洁而有深度、服务提供者的举止不带批判性以及保证隐私。一些参与者认为服务提供者可以根据青少年的年龄或个性来判断所需的讨论深度:本研究强调了青少年在与医疗服务提供者进行 "自我诊断 "时的偏好差异。医疗服务提供者应在启动 "自我诊断 "时声明其目的和保密性。鉴于青少年的观点存在差异,在进行SHD之前私下收集自我报告行为的工具可能有助于医疗服务提供者根据青少年的具体性健康和生殖健康需求以及沟通方式偏好来确定谈话的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
A National Analysis of General Pediatric Inpatient Unit Closures and Openings, 2011-2018. Are Children's Hospitals Doing Enough to Address the Climate Crisis? A Mandate to Mitigate Bias. Potential Bias in Social Work Consultations in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting. Are Child Access Prevention Laws Associated With Fewer Pediatric Firearm Injuries?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1