Psychological readiness for injury recovery: evaluating psychometric properties of the IPRRS and assessing group differences in injured physically active individuals.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001869
Alexandra Dluzniewski, Madeline P Casanova, Sarah Ullrich-French, Christopher J Brush, Lindsay W Larkins, Russell T Baker
{"title":"Psychological readiness for injury recovery: evaluating psychometric properties of the IPRRS and assessing group differences in injured physically active individuals.","authors":"Alexandra Dluzniewski, Madeline P Casanova, Sarah Ullrich-French, Christopher J Brush, Lindsay W Larkins, Russell T Baker","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary purpose of the study was to assess the one-factor and two-factor structure of the Injury Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Scale (IPRRS) in an injured physically active population using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedures and assess group (ie, sex, age, injury type, athlete status) and longitudinal differences using structural equation modelling (eg, invariance testing).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The non-experimental study included a sample of 629 physically active individuals who suffered a musculoskeletal injury who sought treatment at an outpatient integrated sport medicine and rehabilitation therapy clinic. Participants filled out a questionnaire packet at three time points. Data analysis included a CFA and multigroup and longitudinal invariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sample mean age was 26.3 years, with females comprising 49.5%. Chronic injuries represented 29.6% of the sample and 35.0% were classified as competitive athletes. A six-item, one-factor model was confirmed in the sample with factor loadings ranging from 0.67 to 0.86. Multigroup and longitudinal invariance were established. Multigroup invariance demonstrated null differences between sex and injury type, and statistical differences between age and athlete status subgroups. Longitudinal invariance demonstrated a statistically significant increase in psychological readiness over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support the use of the IPRRS as a tool to measure aspects of psychological readiness. Clinicians and researchers can use the IPRRS to assess interventions in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11184180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The primary purpose of the study was to assess the one-factor and two-factor structure of the Injury Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Scale (IPRRS) in an injured physically active population using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedures and assess group (ie, sex, age, injury type, athlete status) and longitudinal differences using structural equation modelling (eg, invariance testing).

Methods: The non-experimental study included a sample of 629 physically active individuals who suffered a musculoskeletal injury who sought treatment at an outpatient integrated sport medicine and rehabilitation therapy clinic. Participants filled out a questionnaire packet at three time points. Data analysis included a CFA and multigroup and longitudinal invariance.

Results: Sample mean age was 26.3 years, with females comprising 49.5%. Chronic injuries represented 29.6% of the sample and 35.0% were classified as competitive athletes. A six-item, one-factor model was confirmed in the sample with factor loadings ranging from 0.67 to 0.86. Multigroup and longitudinal invariance were established. Multigroup invariance demonstrated null differences between sex and injury type, and statistical differences between age and athlete status subgroups. Longitudinal invariance demonstrated a statistically significant increase in psychological readiness over time.

Conclusions: The findings support the use of the IPRRS as a tool to measure aspects of psychological readiness. Clinicians and researchers can use the IPRRS to assess interventions in future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受伤恢复的心理准备:评估 IPRRS 的心理测量特性,并评估受伤体能活动者的群体差异。
研究目的本研究的主要目的是利用确证因子分析(CFA)程序,评估体力活动受伤人群的 "重返运动损伤心理准备量表"(IPRRS)的单因子和双因子结构,并利用结构方程建模(如不变量测试)评估群体(即性别、年龄、损伤类型、运动员状态)和纵向差异:这项非实验研究的样本包括 629 名在综合运动医学和康复治疗门诊接受治疗的肌肉骨骼损伤患者。参与者在三个时间点填写了调查问卷。数据分析包括 CFA 和多组及纵向不变量分析:样本平均年龄为 26.3 岁,女性占 49.5%。慢性损伤占样本的 29.6%,35.0% 属于竞技运动员。在样本中确认了一个由六个项目组成的单因子模型,因子载荷在 0.67 至 0.86 之间。多组不变量和纵向不变量均已确定。多组不变量表明,性别和受伤类型之间的差异为零,年龄和运动员身份亚组之间存在统计学差异。纵向不变性表明,随着时间的推移,心理准备度在统计学上有显著提高:研究结果支持使用 IPRRS 作为测量心理准备的工具。临床医生和研究人员可在未来的研究中使用 IPRRS 评估干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiac health in breast cancer (CHiB): protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. It's about timing: how density can benefit future research on the optimal dosage of acute physical exercise breaks in esports. 24-hour Movement Behaviour study-Lithuanian protocol: a comprehensive overview of behaviours and health outcomes in adolescents. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial. Correction: Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1