{"title":"A Novel Scoring System for MYB RNA In Situ Hybridization Displays High Sensitivity and Specificity for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Clinical Setting.","authors":"Mariel Bedell, Dale W Lewis, Raja R Seethala","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01656-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MYB RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has emerged as a reliable and accessible marker to support adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) diagnosis, though still not well studied. Here, we report our results in a validation and prospective cohort to improve MYB RNA ISH diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>79 cases (23 retrospective and 56 prospective) underwent MYB RNA ISH testing (44 ACC and 35 non-ACC). MYB RNA ISH results were initially interpreted based on previously established (original) scoring criteria. Weighted \"i-scores\", percent positive tumor cells, percent tumor cells with large signals (% LS), and staining pattern (abluminal, diffuse, focal non-patterned, or negative) were inputs for logistic regression models. Final model performance characteristics were compared with original scoring criteria and MYB::NFIB FISH results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An abluminal pattern was characteristic and exclusive to ACC. All i-scores, % LS, and percent positive were significantly higher in ACC. Original scoring criteria yielded a 95.5% sensitivity (Sn), 68.6% specificity (Sp), and 83.5% accuracy. MYB::NFIB FISH yielded a 42.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 60% accuracy. Optimizing for performance, simplicity, and minimal collinearity, our final model was defined as: abluminal pattern and/or % LS > 16.5%, which resulted in a 93.2% Sn, 97.1% Sp, and 94.9% accuracy for ACC diagnosis. False negatives included an ACC with striking tubular eosinophilia and a MYBL1::NFIB translocated ACC. One false positive exclusive to the final model was a nasopharyngeal carcinoma with MYB amplification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MYB RNA ISH has a higher Sn than MYB::NFIB FISH while retaining high Sp. Our model provides improvements to specificity compared to original scoring criteria and highlight the importance of abluminal staining pattern and % LS. Nonetheless, alternate fusions remain key false negatives while rare non-ACC with other mechanisms of MYB activation may present as false positives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01656-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: MYB RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has emerged as a reliable and accessible marker to support adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) diagnosis, though still not well studied. Here, we report our results in a validation and prospective cohort to improve MYB RNA ISH diagnostic accuracy.
Methods: 79 cases (23 retrospective and 56 prospective) underwent MYB RNA ISH testing (44 ACC and 35 non-ACC). MYB RNA ISH results were initially interpreted based on previously established (original) scoring criteria. Weighted "i-scores", percent positive tumor cells, percent tumor cells with large signals (% LS), and staining pattern (abluminal, diffuse, focal non-patterned, or negative) were inputs for logistic regression models. Final model performance characteristics were compared with original scoring criteria and MYB::NFIB FISH results.
Results: An abluminal pattern was characteristic and exclusive to ACC. All i-scores, % LS, and percent positive were significantly higher in ACC. Original scoring criteria yielded a 95.5% sensitivity (Sn), 68.6% specificity (Sp), and 83.5% accuracy. MYB::NFIB FISH yielded a 42.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 60% accuracy. Optimizing for performance, simplicity, and minimal collinearity, our final model was defined as: abluminal pattern and/or % LS > 16.5%, which resulted in a 93.2% Sn, 97.1% Sp, and 94.9% accuracy for ACC diagnosis. False negatives included an ACC with striking tubular eosinophilia and a MYBL1::NFIB translocated ACC. One false positive exclusive to the final model was a nasopharyngeal carcinoma with MYB amplification.
Conclusions: MYB RNA ISH has a higher Sn than MYB::NFIB FISH while retaining high Sp. Our model provides improvements to specificity compared to original scoring criteria and highlight the importance of abluminal staining pattern and % LS. Nonetheless, alternate fusions remain key false negatives while rare non-ACC with other mechanisms of MYB activation may present as false positives.
期刊介绍:
Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck.
The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field.
Single-blind peer review
The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.