A Novel Scoring System for MYB RNA In Situ Hybridization Displays High Sensitivity and Specificity for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Clinical Setting.

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY Head & Neck Pathology Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s12105-024-01656-z
Mariel Bedell, Dale W Lewis, Raja R Seethala
{"title":"A Novel Scoring System for MYB RNA In Situ Hybridization Displays High Sensitivity and Specificity for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Clinical Setting.","authors":"Mariel Bedell, Dale W Lewis, Raja R Seethala","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01656-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MYB RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has emerged as a reliable and accessible marker to support adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) diagnosis, though still not well studied. Here, we report our results in a validation and prospective cohort to improve MYB RNA ISH diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>79 cases (23 retrospective and 56 prospective) underwent MYB RNA ISH testing (44 ACC and 35 non-ACC). MYB RNA ISH results were initially interpreted based on previously established (original) scoring criteria. Weighted \"i-scores\", percent positive tumor cells, percent tumor cells with large signals (% LS), and staining pattern (abluminal, diffuse, focal non-patterned, or negative) were inputs for logistic regression models. Final model performance characteristics were compared with original scoring criteria and MYB::NFIB FISH results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An abluminal pattern was characteristic and exclusive to ACC. All i-scores, % LS, and percent positive were significantly higher in ACC. Original scoring criteria yielded a 95.5% sensitivity (Sn), 68.6% specificity (Sp), and 83.5% accuracy. MYB::NFIB FISH yielded a 42.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 60% accuracy. Optimizing for performance, simplicity, and minimal collinearity, our final model was defined as: abluminal pattern and/or % LS > 16.5%, which resulted in a 93.2% Sn, 97.1% Sp, and 94.9% accuracy for ACC diagnosis. False negatives included an ACC with striking tubular eosinophilia and a MYBL1::NFIB translocated ACC. One false positive exclusive to the final model was a nasopharyngeal carcinoma with MYB amplification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MYB RNA ISH has a higher Sn than MYB::NFIB FISH while retaining high Sp. Our model provides improvements to specificity compared to original scoring criteria and highlight the importance of abluminal staining pattern and % LS. Nonetheless, alternate fusions remain key false negatives while rare non-ACC with other mechanisms of MYB activation may present as false positives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01656-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MYB RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) has emerged as a reliable and accessible marker to support adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) diagnosis, though still not well studied. Here, we report our results in a validation and prospective cohort to improve MYB RNA ISH diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: 79 cases (23 retrospective and 56 prospective) underwent MYB RNA ISH testing (44 ACC and 35 non-ACC). MYB RNA ISH results were initially interpreted based on previously established (original) scoring criteria. Weighted "i-scores", percent positive tumor cells, percent tumor cells with large signals (% LS), and staining pattern (abluminal, diffuse, focal non-patterned, or negative) were inputs for logistic regression models. Final model performance characteristics were compared with original scoring criteria and MYB::NFIB FISH results.

Results: An abluminal pattern was characteristic and exclusive to ACC. All i-scores, % LS, and percent positive were significantly higher in ACC. Original scoring criteria yielded a 95.5% sensitivity (Sn), 68.6% specificity (Sp), and 83.5% accuracy. MYB::NFIB FISH yielded a 42.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 60% accuracy. Optimizing for performance, simplicity, and minimal collinearity, our final model was defined as: abluminal pattern and/or % LS > 16.5%, which resulted in a 93.2% Sn, 97.1% Sp, and 94.9% accuracy for ACC diagnosis. False negatives included an ACC with striking tubular eosinophilia and a MYBL1::NFIB translocated ACC. One false positive exclusive to the final model was a nasopharyngeal carcinoma with MYB amplification.

Conclusions: MYB RNA ISH has a higher Sn than MYB::NFIB FISH while retaining high Sp. Our model provides improvements to specificity compared to original scoring criteria and highlight the importance of abluminal staining pattern and % LS. Nonetheless, alternate fusions remain key false negatives while rare non-ACC with other mechanisms of MYB activation may present as false positives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型 MYB RNA 原位杂交评分系统在临床环境中对腺样囊性癌具有高灵敏度和特异性
背景:MYB RNA原位杂交(ISH)已成为支持腺样囊性癌(ACC)诊断的一种可靠、易得的标记物,但研究仍不充分。方法:79 个病例(23 个回顾性病例和 56 个前瞻性病例)接受了 MYB RNA ISH 检测(44 个 ACC 病例和 35 个非 ACC 病例)。MYB RNA ISH 检测结果最初根据以前建立的(原始)评分标准进行解释。加权 "i-分数"、阳性肿瘤细胞百分比、大信号肿瘤细胞百分比(% LS)和染色模式(基底层、弥漫、局灶无模式或阴性)是逻辑回归模型的输入。将最终模型的性能特征与原始评分标准和 MYB::NFIB FISH 结果进行比较:消融模式是 ACC 独有的特征。在 ACC 中,所有 i 分数、LS 百分比和阳性百分比都明显较高。原始评分标准的灵敏度(Sn)为 95.5%,特异度(Sp)为 68.6%,准确率为 83.5%。MYB::NFIB FISH 的灵敏度为 42.9%,特异性为 100%,准确率为 60%。在性能、简便性和最小共线性方面进行优化后,我们的最终模型被定义为:腔隙模式和/或 LS% > 16.5%,从而使 ACC 诊断的灵敏度(Sn)、特异度(Sp)和准确度(Sp)分别达到 93.2%、97.1% 和 94.9%。假阴性包括伴有显著管状嗜酸性粒细胞增多的 ACC 和 MYBL1::NFIB 易位的 ACC。最终模型中只有一个假阳性,即鼻咽癌伴有MYB扩增:结论:与 MYB::NFIB FISH 相比,MYB RNA ISH 的 Sn 值更高,同时保留了较高的 Sp 值。与最初的评分标准相比,我们的模型提高了特异性,并突出了腔内染色模式和LS%的重要性。尽管如此,交替融合仍是关键的假阴性,而罕见的非 ACC 与其他 MYB 激活机制可能会出现假阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
期刊最新文献
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma with Sebaceous Differentiation and MYB::NFIB Fusion Arising in the External Auditory Canal. Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst Presenting Odontogenic Keratocyst-Like Areas: A Rare Case Report. DEK::AFF2 Fusion-Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series with Literature Review on an Emerging and Challenging Entity. The Pathologist as the Patient: Professional Insights Gained from a Personal Health Journey. Secretory Carcinoma of the Thyroid: A Case Report and Update of Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1