Adaptation of complex interventions for people with long-term conditions: a scoping review.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Translational Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibae031
Jamal Uddin, Vicky L Joshi, Valerie Wells, Mithila Faruque, Saidur R Mashreky, Ani Movsisyan, Rhiannon Evans, Graham Moore, Rod S Taylor
{"title":"Adaptation of complex interventions for people with long-term conditions: a scoping review.","authors":"Jamal Uddin, Vicky L Joshi, Valerie Wells, Mithila Faruque, Saidur R Mashreky, Ani Movsisyan, Rhiannon Evans, Graham Moore, Rod S Taylor","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adaptation seeks to transfer and implement healthcare interventions developed and evaluated in one context to another. The aim of this scoping review was to understand current approaches to the adaptation of complex interventions for people with long-term conditions (LTCs) and to identify issues for studies performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Bibliographic databases were searched from 2000 to October 2022. This review involved five stages: (i) definition of the research question(s); (ii) identifying relevant studies; (iii) study selection; (iv) data charting; and (v) data synthesis. Extraction included an assessment of the: rationale for adaptation; stages and levels of adaptation; use of theoretical frameworks, and quality of reporting using a checklist based on the 2021 ADAPT guidance. Twenty-five studies were included from across 21 LTCs and a range of complex interventions. The majority (16 studies) focused on macro (national or international) level interventions. The rationale for adaptation included intervention transfer across geographical settings [high-income country (HIC) to LMIC: six studies, one HIC to another: eight studies, one LMIC to another: two studies], or transfer across socio-economic/racial groups (five studies), or transfer between different health settings within a single country (one study). Overall, studies were judged to be of moderate reporting quality (median score 23, maximum 46), and typically focused on early stages of adaptation (identification and development) with limited outcome evaluation or implementation assessment of the adapted version of the intervention. Improved reporting of the adaptation for complex interventions targeted at LTCs is needed. Development of future adaptation methods guidance needs to consider the needs and priorities of the LMIC context.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"514-526"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adaptation seeks to transfer and implement healthcare interventions developed and evaluated in one context to another. The aim of this scoping review was to understand current approaches to the adaptation of complex interventions for people with long-term conditions (LTCs) and to identify issues for studies performed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Bibliographic databases were searched from 2000 to October 2022. This review involved five stages: (i) definition of the research question(s); (ii) identifying relevant studies; (iii) study selection; (iv) data charting; and (v) data synthesis. Extraction included an assessment of the: rationale for adaptation; stages and levels of adaptation; use of theoretical frameworks, and quality of reporting using a checklist based on the 2021 ADAPT guidance. Twenty-five studies were included from across 21 LTCs and a range of complex interventions. The majority (16 studies) focused on macro (national or international) level interventions. The rationale for adaptation included intervention transfer across geographical settings [high-income country (HIC) to LMIC: six studies, one HIC to another: eight studies, one LMIC to another: two studies], or transfer across socio-economic/racial groups (five studies), or transfer between different health settings within a single country (one study). Overall, studies were judged to be of moderate reporting quality (median score 23, maximum 46), and typically focused on early stages of adaptation (identification and development) with limited outcome evaluation or implementation assessment of the adapted version of the intervention. Improved reporting of the adaptation for complex interventions targeted at LTCs is needed. Development of future adaptation methods guidance needs to consider the needs and priorities of the LMIC context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为长期病患者调整复杂干预措施:范围界定审查。
适应性研究旨在将在一种环境中开发和评估的医疗干预措施转移到另一种环境中并加以实施。本范围综述旨在了解目前针对长期病患者(LTCs)的复杂干预措施的适应性方法,并确定在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)开展研究的问题。我们检索了 2000 年至 2022 年 10 月的文献数据库。本综述包括五个阶段:(i) 确定研究问题;(ii) 识别相关研究;(iii) 研究选择;(iv) 数据图表;(v) 数据综合。提取工作包括对以下方面进行评估:适应的理由;适应的阶段和水平;理论框架的使用;以及使用基于 2021 ADAPT 指南的核对表进行报告的质量。共纳入了 25 项研究,涉及 21 种长期治疗方法和一系列复杂的干预措施。大多数研究(16 项)侧重于宏观(国家或国际)层面的干预措施。调整的理由包括干预措施在不同地理环境之间的转移[高收入国家到低收入国家:6 项研究,一个高收入国家到另一个高收入国家:8 项研究,一个低收入国家到另一个低收入国家:2 项研究],或在不同社会经济/种族群体之间的转移(5 项研究),或在一个国家内不同医疗环境之间的转移(1 项研究)。总体而言,这些研究的报告质量被判定为中等(中位数为 23 分,最高为 46 分),且通常侧重于早期适应阶段(确定和发展),对干预措施适应版本的结果评估或实施评估有限。需要改进针对长 期治疗的复杂干预措施的适应性报告。未来适应方法指南的制定需要考虑低收入和中等收入国家的需求和优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with successful FLOW implementation to improve mental health access: a mixed-methods study. Food retailer actions toward the National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health to promote nutrition security: Applicability of the Business Impact Assessment-Obesity as a monitoring tool. Identifying and supporting vaccine champions in pediatric primary care: a qualitative interview study. Moving psychedelic-assisted therapies from promising research into routine clinical practice: Lessons from the field of implementation science. Adaptation of an evidence-based, preventive intervention to promote mental health in Hispanic adolescents: eHealth Familias Unidas Mental Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1