Clinical validation of the nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" in patients with laryngeal cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12480
Ruirui Duan, Yongxia Ding, Yanzhi Tian, Huixian Yang, Jing Xu
{"title":"Clinical validation of the nursing outcome \"Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase\" in patients with laryngeal cancer.","authors":"Ruirui Duan, Yongxia Ding, Yanzhi Tian, Huixian Yang, Jing Xu","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to clinically validate the nursing outcome \"Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase\" (1013).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage study was designed: (1) Chinese translation and cultural adaptation and (2) clinical validation. Internal consistency and interrater reliability tests were performed on 285 patients with laryngeal cancer, and an additional 130 patients were randomly selected from the 285 patients as an independent sample. Criterion-related validity tests were performed using the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA). Nursing outcome sensitivity was detected by scoring two time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.951 for the nursing outcome and 0.942-0.965 for each indicator. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for each indicator ranged from 0.73 to 0.929. The scores of the nursing outcome were negatively correlated with the SSA scores (r = -0.555, p < 0.01). With the exception of two indicators, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the total scores of the scale and its 11 indicator scores for the two time points. The results indicated that the nursing outcome \"Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase\" (1013) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties and high sensitivity to change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nursing outcome \"Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase\" (1013) demonstrated good reliability, validity, and sensitivity in patients with laryngeal cancer.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>The nursing outcome \"Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase\" (1013) can be used to assess swallowing function in patients with laryngeal cancer and provide guidance for the development of rehabilitation intervention plans and nursing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives: This study aimed to clinically validate the nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013).

Methods: A two-stage study was designed: (1) Chinese translation and cultural adaptation and (2) clinical validation. Internal consistency and interrater reliability tests were performed on 285 patients with laryngeal cancer, and an additional 130 patients were randomly selected from the 285 patients as an independent sample. Criterion-related validity tests were performed using the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA). Nursing outcome sensitivity was detected by scoring two time points.

Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.951 for the nursing outcome and 0.942-0.965 for each indicator. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for each indicator ranged from 0.73 to 0.929. The scores of the nursing outcome were negatively correlated with the SSA scores (r = -0.555, p < 0.01). With the exception of two indicators, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the total scores of the scale and its 11 indicator scores for the two time points. The results indicated that the nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties and high sensitivity to change.

Conclusions: The nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013) demonstrated good reliability, validity, and sensitivity in patients with laryngeal cancer.

Implications for nursing practice: The nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013) can be used to assess swallowing function in patients with laryngeal cancer and provide guidance for the development of rehabilitation intervention plans and nursing care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喉癌患者 "吞咽状态:咽阶段 "护理结果的临床验证。
目的和目标本研究旨在对护理结果 "吞咽状态:咽相"(1013)进行临床验证:研究分为两个阶段:(1)中文翻译和文化适应;(2)临床验证。对 285 名喉癌患者进行了内部一致性和互测可靠性测试,并从这 285 名患者中随机抽取了 130 名患者作为独立样本。标准相关有效性测试采用标准化吞咽评估(SSA)进行。通过对两个时间点进行评分来检测护理结果的敏感性:护理结果的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.951,每个指标的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.942-0.965。各指标的类间相关系数(ICC)值在 0.73 至 0.929 之间。护理结果评分与 SSA 评分呈负相关(r = -0.555,p 结论:护理结果评分与 SSA 评分呈负相关:护理结果 "吞咽状态:咽阶段"(1013)在喉癌患者中表现出良好的可靠性、有效性和敏感性:护理结果 "吞咽状态:咽相"(1013)可用于评估喉癌患者的吞咽功能,为制定康复干预计划和护理提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
期刊最新文献
"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)" and "Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)": Clinical validation. Auriculotherapy nursing intervention: Development and content validation by specialists. Ineffective overweight self-management: A study of diagnostic accuracy and etiological relationships. Nursing diagnosis of risk for elopement attempt: A content validation study. Enhancing nursing care through technology and standardized nursing language: The TEC-MED multilingual platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1