SUMEX: A hybrid framework for Semantic textUal siMilarity and EXplanation generation

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103771
Sumaira Saeed, Quratulain Rajput, Sajjad Haider
{"title":"SUMEX: A hybrid framework for Semantic textUal siMilarity and EXplanation generation","authors":"Sumaira Saeed,&nbsp;Quratulain Rajput,&nbsp;Sajjad Haider","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Measuring semantic similarity between two pieces of text is a widely known problem in Natural language processing(NLP). It has many applications, such as finding similar medical notes of patients to accelerate the diagnosis process, plagiarism detection, and document clustering. Most state-of-the-art models are based on machine/deep learning and lack sufficient explanations for their results, limiting their adoption in critical domains like healthcare. This paper presents a hybrid framework SUMEX (Semantic textUal siMilarity and EXplanation generation) that uniquely combines ontology with a state-of-the-art embedding-based model for semantic textual similarity. The primary strength of the framework is that it explains its results in human-understandable natural language, which is vital in critical domains such as healthcare. Experiments have been conducted on two datasets of clinical notes using four embeddings: ScispaCy, BioWord2Vec, ClinicalBERT, and a customized Word2Vec trained on clinical notes. The SUMEX framework outperforms the embedding-based model on the benchmark datasets of ClinicalSTS by improving average precision scores by 7 % and reducing the false-positives-rate by 23 %. On the Patients Similarity Dataset, the average top-five and top-three precision scores were improved by 14% and 10%, respectively, using SUMEX. The SUMEX also generates explanations for its results in natural language. The domain experts evaluated the quality of the explanations. The results show that the generated explanations are of significantly good quality, with a score of 90 % and 93 % for measures of Completeness and Correctness, respectively. In addition, ChatGPT was also used for similarity score and generating explanations. The experiments show that the SUMEX framework performed better than the ChatGPT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324001316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring semantic similarity between two pieces of text is a widely known problem in Natural language processing(NLP). It has many applications, such as finding similar medical notes of patients to accelerate the diagnosis process, plagiarism detection, and document clustering. Most state-of-the-art models are based on machine/deep learning and lack sufficient explanations for their results, limiting their adoption in critical domains like healthcare. This paper presents a hybrid framework SUMEX (Semantic textUal siMilarity and EXplanation generation) that uniquely combines ontology with a state-of-the-art embedding-based model for semantic textual similarity. The primary strength of the framework is that it explains its results in human-understandable natural language, which is vital in critical domains such as healthcare. Experiments have been conducted on two datasets of clinical notes using four embeddings: ScispaCy, BioWord2Vec, ClinicalBERT, and a customized Word2Vec trained on clinical notes. The SUMEX framework outperforms the embedding-based model on the benchmark datasets of ClinicalSTS by improving average precision scores by 7 % and reducing the false-positives-rate by 23 %. On the Patients Similarity Dataset, the average top-five and top-three precision scores were improved by 14% and 10%, respectively, using SUMEX. The SUMEX also generates explanations for its results in natural language. The domain experts evaluated the quality of the explanations. The results show that the generated explanations are of significantly good quality, with a score of 90 % and 93 % for measures of Completeness and Correctness, respectively. In addition, ChatGPT was also used for similarity score and generating explanations. The experiments show that the SUMEX framework performed better than the ChatGPT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SUMEX:用于生成语义文本相似性和 EXplanation 的混合框架
测量两篇文本之间的语义相似性是自然语言处理(NLP)中一个广为人知的问题。它有很多应用,如寻找病人的相似医疗笔记以加速诊断过程、剽窃检测和文档聚类。大多数最先进的模型都是基于机器/深度学习的,缺乏对其结果的充分解释,限制了它们在医疗保健等关键领域的应用。本文提出了一个混合框架 SUMEX(语义文本相似性和 EXplanation 生成),它独特地将本体与最先进的基于嵌入的语义文本相似性模型相结合。该框架的主要优势在于它能用人类可理解的自然语言解释其结果,这在医疗保健等关键领域至关重要。在两个临床笔记数据集上使用四种嵌入进行了实验:ScispaCy、BioWord2Vec、ClinicalBERT 以及根据临床笔记训练的定制 Word2Vec。在 ClinicalSTS 基准数据集上,SUMEX 框架的表现优于基于嵌入的模型,平均精确度提高了 7%,误判率降低了 23%。在患者相似性数据集上,使用 SUMEX,前五名和前三名的平均精确度分别提高了 14% 和 10%。SUMEX 还能用自然语言生成结果解释。领域专家对解释的质量进行了评估。结果表明,生成的解释质量很高,在完整性和正确性方面的得分分别为 90% 和 93%。此外,ChatGPT 也用于相似性评分和生成解释。实验结果表明,SUMEX 框架的性能优于 ChatGPT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Fusing temporal and semantic dependencies for session-based recommendation A Universal Adaptive Algorithm for Graph Anomaly Detection A context-aware attention and graph neural network-based multimodal framework for misogyny detection Multi-granularity contrastive zero-shot learning model based on attribute decomposition Asymmetric augmented paradigm-based graph neural architecture search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1