Sustaining clean cooking: A system dynamics study of Ghana's rural LPG promotion program

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2024.101497
Martha M. McAlister , James R. Mihelcic , Amy L. Stuart , Qiong Zhang
{"title":"Sustaining clean cooking: A system dynamics study of Ghana's rural LPG promotion program","authors":"Martha M. McAlister ,&nbsp;James R. Mihelcic ,&nbsp;Amy L. Stuart ,&nbsp;Qiong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2024.101497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Household air pollution is a pervasive environmental health problem wherever access to cleaner fuels is poor. Despite numerous attempts to transition households away from polluting fuels, interventions are rarely sustainable. This intractability indicates that structural (i.e., systemic) dynamics act to maintain the status quo. In this case study of Ghana's Rural Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Promotion Program, our objectives were to 1) identify system structures affecting sustained fuel use, and 2) test strategies for improving intervention outcomes. To address these objectives, we applied a system dynamics approach, informed by a systematic literature review. A virtual simulation model was constructed to represent the implementation of the Rural LPG Program and its outcomes. By analyzing the model's structure and behavior, we proposed strategies that would improve the intervention's outcomes and tested the effectiveness of the strategies within the simulation model. Our results show that distributing two LPG cylinders to households (instead of one) contributed toward primary use of the fuel, whereas free weekly delivery of LPG (for up to four years) had limited long-term benefits and diminishing returns. Furthermore, reducing the time for users to perceive the benefits of cleaner fuels enhanced willingness-to-pay, and thereby helped to sustain higher rates of LPG use. This suggests that intervention planners should identify new users' expectations of benefits and proactively design ways to realize those benefits quickly (in a few weeks or less), while policy makers should support this as a design requirement in approval processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082624001236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Household air pollution is a pervasive environmental health problem wherever access to cleaner fuels is poor. Despite numerous attempts to transition households away from polluting fuels, interventions are rarely sustainable. This intractability indicates that structural (i.e., systemic) dynamics act to maintain the status quo. In this case study of Ghana's Rural Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Promotion Program, our objectives were to 1) identify system structures affecting sustained fuel use, and 2) test strategies for improving intervention outcomes. To address these objectives, we applied a system dynamics approach, informed by a systematic literature review. A virtual simulation model was constructed to represent the implementation of the Rural LPG Program and its outcomes. By analyzing the model's structure and behavior, we proposed strategies that would improve the intervention's outcomes and tested the effectiveness of the strategies within the simulation model. Our results show that distributing two LPG cylinders to households (instead of one) contributed toward primary use of the fuel, whereas free weekly delivery of LPG (for up to four years) had limited long-term benefits and diminishing returns. Furthermore, reducing the time for users to perceive the benefits of cleaner fuels enhanced willingness-to-pay, and thereby helped to sustain higher rates of LPG use. This suggests that intervention planners should identify new users' expectations of benefits and proactively design ways to realize those benefits quickly (in a few weeks or less), while policy makers should support this as a design requirement in approval processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续清洁烹饪:加纳农村液化石油气推广计划的系统动力学研究
在清洁燃料匮乏的地方,家庭空气污染是一个普遍存在的环境健康问题。尽管人们多次尝试让家庭摆脱污染燃料,但干预措施很少能够持续。这种棘手性表明,结构性(即系统性)动态因素在起作用,以维持现状。在对加纳农村液化石油气(LPG)推广计划的案例研究中,我们的目标是:1)确定影响燃料持续使用的系统结构;2)测试改善干预结果的策略。为了实现这些目标,我们在系统性文献回顾的基础上,采用了系统动力学方法。我们构建了一个虚拟仿真模型,以表示农村液化石油气计划的实施情况及其结果。通过分析模型的结构和行为,我们提出了改善干预结果的策略,并在模拟模型中测试了这些策略的有效性。我们的结果表明,向家庭发放两个液化石油气瓶(而不是一个)有助于燃料的主要使用,而每周免费提供液化石油气(长达四年)的长期效益有限且收益递减。此外,缩短用户感知清洁燃料益处的时间也提高了支付意愿,从而有助于维持较高的液化石油气使用率。这表明,干预规划者应确定新用户对收益的预期,并积极设计快速(在几周或更短时间内)实现这些收益的方法,而政策制定者应支持将此作为审批过程中的一项设计要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Economic Analysis of Bifacial Roof-top PV Systems Development of a comprehensive Rooftop Solar PV Index using DVF framework of Design Thinking Long-range energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions analysis using the LEAP Model: A case study of building ceramic industrial park Assessing greenhouse gas emissions and decarbonization potential of household biogas plant: Nepal's case study Spatial vulnerability of energy poverty among the households in Odisha
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1