Economic Perspective of the Use of Wearables in Health Care: A Systematic Review

Gioacchino D. De Sario Velasquez MD , Sahar Borna MD , Michael J. Maniaci MD , Jordan D. Coffey MBA , Clifton R. Haider PhD , Bart M. Demaerschalk MSc, MD , Antonio Jorge Forte MD, PhD
{"title":"Economic Perspective of the Use of Wearables in Health Care: A Systematic Review","authors":"Gioacchino D. De Sario Velasquez MD ,&nbsp;Sahar Borna MD ,&nbsp;Michael J. Maniaci MD ,&nbsp;Jordan D. Coffey MBA ,&nbsp;Clifton R. Haider PhD ,&nbsp;Bart M. Demaerschalk MSc, MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Jorge Forte MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study is to explore the current state of research concerning the cost-effectiveness of wearable health technologies, excluding hearing aids, owing to extensive previous investigation. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to search studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of wearable health devices in terms of quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The search was conducted on March 28, 2023, and the date of publication did not limit the search. The search yielded 10 studies eligible for inclusion. These studies, published between 2012 and 2023, spanned various locations globally. The studies used data from hypothetical cohorts, existing research, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. They covered a diverse range of wearable technologies applied in different health care settings, including respiratory rate monitors, pedometers, fall-prediction devices, hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention monitors, seizure detection devices, heart rate monitors, insulin therapy sensors, and wearable cardioverter defibrillators. The time horizons in the cost-effectiveness analyses ranged from less than a year to a lifetime. The studies indicate that wearable technologies can increase quality-adjusted life years and be cost-effective and potentially cost-saving. However, the cost-effectiveness depends on various factors, such as the type of device, the health condition being addressed, the specific perspective of the health economic analysis, local cost and payment structure, and willingness-to-pay thresholds. The use of wearables in health care promises improving outcomes and resource allocation. However, more research is needed to fully understand the long-term benefits and to strengthen the evidence base for health care providers, policymakers, and patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 299-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000385/pdfft?md5=dcc6804bc580088be603b0023cca6ac3&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000385-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore the current state of research concerning the cost-effectiveness of wearable health technologies, excluding hearing aids, owing to extensive previous investigation. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to search studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of wearable health devices in terms of quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The search was conducted on March 28, 2023, and the date of publication did not limit the search. The search yielded 10 studies eligible for inclusion. These studies, published between 2012 and 2023, spanned various locations globally. The studies used data from hypothetical cohorts, existing research, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. They covered a diverse range of wearable technologies applied in different health care settings, including respiratory rate monitors, pedometers, fall-prediction devices, hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention monitors, seizure detection devices, heart rate monitors, insulin therapy sensors, and wearable cardioverter defibrillators. The time horizons in the cost-effectiveness analyses ranged from less than a year to a lifetime. The studies indicate that wearable technologies can increase quality-adjusted life years and be cost-effective and potentially cost-saving. However, the cost-effectiveness depends on various factors, such as the type of device, the health condition being addressed, the specific perspective of the health economic analysis, local cost and payment structure, and willingness-to-pay thresholds. The use of wearables in health care promises improving outcomes and resource allocation. However, more research is needed to fully understand the long-term benefits and to strengthen the evidence base for health care providers, policymakers, and patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从经济角度看可穿戴设备在医疗保健中的应用:系统回顾
本研究旨在探讨有关可穿戴健康技术(不包括助听器)成本效益的研究现状。我们使用 PubMed、EMBASE/MEDLINE、谷歌学术和护理与专职医疗文献累积索引进行了一项系统性综述,以质量调整生命年和增量成本效益比为标准,搜索评估可穿戴健康设备成本效益的研究。检索于 2023 年 3 月 28 日进行,发表日期不限制检索。搜索结果有 10 项研究符合纳入条件。这些研究发表于 2012 年至 2023 年,分布于全球各地。这些研究使用了来自假设队列、现有研究、随机对照试验和荟萃分析的数据。这些研究涵盖了应用于不同医疗环境的各种可穿戴技术,包括呼吸频率监测器、计步器、跌倒预测设备、医院获得性压力伤害预防监测器、癫痫发作检测设备、心率监测器、胰岛素治疗传感器和可穿戴心脏转复除颤器。成本效益分析的时间跨度从不到一年到终生不等。这些研究表明,可穿戴技术可以提高质量调整生命年,具有成本效益,并有可能节约成本。不过,成本效益取决于多种因素,如设备类型、所针对的健康状况、卫生经济分析的具体视角、当地成本和支付结构以及支付意愿阈值。在医疗保健中使用可穿戴设备有望改善治疗效果和资源分配。但是,还需要进行更多的研究,以充分了解其长期益处,并为医疗服务提供者、政策制定者和患者加强证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Developing a Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Strategic Considerations for Selecting Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Institutional Integration: A Single-Center Experience Reviewers for Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (2024) A Blueprint for Clinical-Driven Medical Device Development: The Feverkidstool Application to Identify Children With Serious Bacterial Infection Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiograms for Early Detection of Low Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the Electrocardiogram Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1