In vitro evaluation of microneedle strength: a comparison of test configurations and experimental insights

Bilal Harieth Alrimawi, Jing Yi Lee, Keng Wooi Ng and Choon Fu Goh
{"title":"In vitro evaluation of microneedle strength: a comparison of test configurations and experimental insights","authors":"Bilal Harieth Alrimawi, Jing Yi Lee, Keng Wooi Ng and Choon Fu Goh","doi":"10.1039/D4PM00024B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >To ensure the safe and effective application of microneedles for drug delivery to the skin, the mechanical properties the microneedles and their ability to penetrate the skin are critical quality control parameters. While <em>ex vivo</em> and <em>in vivo</em> evaluations may be valuable to demonstrate actual skin penetration, they can be costly and difficult to accomplish consistently due to the inherent biological variability of the skin. On the other hand, <em>in vitro</em> approaches provide a facile means of characterising the intrinsic mechanical properties of the microneedles, independent of such biological variability. Thus, they can be used to predict and screen for the <em>in vivo</em> and <em>ex vivo</em> performance of new microneedle formulations. A variety of experimental configurations has been reported in the literature focusing on mechanical evaluations including compression tests and <em>in vitro</em> microneedle insertion studies using a non-biological skin simulant, Parafilm® M. However, there has been a paucity of data that address the comparability of the various experimental configurations. Here, we evaluated several methods for assessing the mechanical properties of microneedles <em>in vitro</em>, including their ability to insert into a non-biological skin simulant under a defined axial force, and share some insights into the experimental design and data interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":101141,"journal":{"name":"RSC Pharmaceutics","volume":" 2","pages":" 227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/pm/d4pm00024b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/pm/d4pm00024b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To ensure the safe and effective application of microneedles for drug delivery to the skin, the mechanical properties the microneedles and their ability to penetrate the skin are critical quality control parameters. While ex vivo and in vivo evaluations may be valuable to demonstrate actual skin penetration, they can be costly and difficult to accomplish consistently due to the inherent biological variability of the skin. On the other hand, in vitro approaches provide a facile means of characterising the intrinsic mechanical properties of the microneedles, independent of such biological variability. Thus, they can be used to predict and screen for the in vivo and ex vivo performance of new microneedle formulations. A variety of experimental configurations has been reported in the literature focusing on mechanical evaluations including compression tests and in vitro microneedle insertion studies using a non-biological skin simulant, Parafilm® M. However, there has been a paucity of data that address the comparability of the various experimental configurations. Here, we evaluated several methods for assessing the mechanical properties of microneedles in vitro, including their ability to insert into a non-biological skin simulant under a defined axial force, and share some insights into the experimental design and data interpretation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微针强度的体外评估:测试配置和实验见解的比较
为确保安全有效地将微针应用于皮肤给药,微针的机械性能及其穿透皮肤的能力是关键的质量控制参数。虽然体外和体内评估对证明皮肤的实际穿透能力很有价值,但由于皮肤固有的生物变异性,这些评估可能成本高昂,而且难以始终如一地完成。另一方面,体外方法提供了一种表征微针内在机械特性的简便方法,不受这种生物变异性的影响。因此,它们可用于预测和筛选新微针配方的体内外性能。文献中报道了各种实验配置,重点是机械评估,包括压缩试验和使用非生物皮肤模拟物 Parafilm® M 进行的体外微针插入研究。在此,我们评估了几种评估体外微针机械性能的方法,包括微针在确定的轴向力作用下插入非生物皮肤模拟物的能力,并分享了对实验设计和数据解读的一些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back cover Microfluidics-generated PLA nanoparticles: impact of purification method on macrophage interactions, anti-inflammatory effects, biodistribution, and protein corona formation. Heparin sodium enriched gelatin/polycaprolactone based multi-layer nanofibrous scaffold for accelerated wound healing in diabetes Increased thermal stability and retained antibacterial properties in a sulbactam and amantadine salt: towards effective antibacterial–antiviral combination therapies† On-demand release of encapsulated ZnO nanoparticles and chemotherapeutics for drug delivery applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1