Mirosław Ząbek, Grzegorz Turek, Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Andrzej Kokoszka, Sebastian Dzierzęcki, Barbara Kostecka
{"title":"Long-Term Quality of Life in Patients with Intracanalicular Vestibular Schwannomas after Gamma Knife Surgery Treatment: A Follow-Up Study","authors":"Mirosław Ząbek, Grzegorz Turek, Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Andrzej Kokoszka, Sebastian Dzierzęcki, Barbara Kostecka","doi":"10.1155/2024/5598225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Our previous research showed that the gamma knife surgery (GKS) is a highly effective treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (IVS). In the current study, we aimed to evaluate long-term quality of life (QoL) as a follow-up to the assessment of baseline clinical and demographic parameters in the original study. Moreover, QoL outcomes were compared with norms for the general population and for patients who underwent different ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. The follow-up study included 92 patients (59 women and 33 men; mean age, 61.71 ± 12.55 years; range: 32-85 years) with unilateral IVS who underwent GKS. Patients completed the <i>Assessment of Quality of Life</i>, Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, and WHO-5 Well-being Index questionnaires as well as a demographic survey. Neurosurgical parameters were assessed using the Koos and House-Brackmann scales and the results of audiological examinations. <i>Results and Conclusions</i>. QoL scores were within or above the norm in 38% of patients. There were significant differences in terms of comorbidities and emotional well-being between patients with QoL scores within or above the norm and patients with QoL scores below the norm. Comorbidities were more common in patients with QoL scores below the norm, and they influenced reported QoL (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Patients with QoL scores within or above the norm reported better emotional well-being than those with QoL scores below the norm. Long-term QoL outcomes were satisfactory, consistent with the results of the original study. Although GKS is a complex procedure, patients reported higher QoL than those using hearing aids and the same QoL as those after ENT surgery or reassurance. However, they reported a slightly lower QoL than patients taking ENT medications. GKS appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with IVS.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5598225","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5598225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction. Our previous research showed that the gamma knife surgery (GKS) is a highly effective treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (IVS). In the current study, we aimed to evaluate long-term quality of life (QoL) as a follow-up to the assessment of baseline clinical and demographic parameters in the original study. Moreover, QoL outcomes were compared with norms for the general population and for patients who underwent different ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures. Materials and Methods. The follow-up study included 92 patients (59 women and 33 men; mean age, 61.71 ± 12.55 years; range: 32-85 years) with unilateral IVS who underwent GKS. Patients completed the Assessment of Quality of Life, Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, and WHO-5 Well-being Index questionnaires as well as a demographic survey. Neurosurgical parameters were assessed using the Koos and House-Brackmann scales and the results of audiological examinations. Results and Conclusions. QoL scores were within or above the norm in 38% of patients. There were significant differences in terms of comorbidities and emotional well-being between patients with QoL scores within or above the norm and patients with QoL scores below the norm. Comorbidities were more common in patients with QoL scores below the norm, and they influenced reported QoL (p = 0.009). Patients with QoL scores within or above the norm reported better emotional well-being than those with QoL scores below the norm. Long-term QoL outcomes were satisfactory, consistent with the results of the original study. Although GKS is a complex procedure, patients reported higher QoL than those using hearing aids and the same QoL as those after ENT surgery or reassurance. However, they reported a slightly lower QoL than patients taking ENT medications. GKS appears to be a promising treatment option for patients with IVS.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.