Lauren Lee, Raimat Korede Salami, Helena Martin, Lavanhya Shantharam, Kate Thomas, Emily Ashworth, Emma Allan, Ka-Wai Yung, Cato Pauling, Deirdre Leyden, Owen J Arthurs, Susan Cheng Shelmerdine
{"title":"\"How I would like AI used for my imaging\": children and young persons' perspectives.","authors":"Lauren Lee, Raimat Korede Salami, Helena Martin, Lavanhya Shantharam, Kate Thomas, Emily Ashworth, Emma Allan, Ka-Wai Yung, Cato Pauling, Deirdre Leyden, Owen J Arthurs, Susan Cheng Shelmerdine","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10839-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are becoming more available in modern healthcare, particularly in radiology, although less attention has been paid to applications for children and young people. In the development of these, it is critical their views are heard.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A national, online survey was publicised to UK schools, universities and charity partners encouraging any child or young adult to participate. The survey was \"live\" for one year (June 2022 to 2023). Questions about views of AI in general, and in specific circumstances (e.g. bone fractures) were asked.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventy-one eligible responses were received, with a mean age of 19 years (6-23 years) with representation across all 4 UK nations. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed they wanted to know the accuracy of an AI tool that was being used (122/171, 71.3%), that accuracy was more important than speed (113/171, 66.1%), and that AI should be used with human oversight (110/171, 64.3%). Many respondents (73/171, 42.7%) felt AI would be more accurate at finding problems on bone X-rays than humans, with almost all respondents who had sustained a missed fracture strongly agreeing with that sentiment (12/14, 85.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children and young people in our survey had positive views regarding AI, and felt it should be integrated into modern healthcare, but expressed a preference for a \"medical professional in the loop\" and accuracy of findings over speed. Key themes regarding information on AI performance and governance were raised and should be considered prior to future AI implementation for paediatric healthcare.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) integration into clinical practice must consider all stakeholders, especially paediatric patients who have largely been ignored. Children and young people favour AI involvement with human oversight, seek assurances for safety, accuracy, and clear accountability in case of failures.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Paediatric patient's needs and voices are often overlooked in AI tool design and deployment. Children and young people approved of AI, if paired with human oversight and reliability. Children and young people are stakeholders for developing and deploying AI tools in paediatrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7751-7764"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10839-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are becoming more available in modern healthcare, particularly in radiology, although less attention has been paid to applications for children and young people. In the development of these, it is critical their views are heard.
Materials and methods: A national, online survey was publicised to UK schools, universities and charity partners encouraging any child or young adult to participate. The survey was "live" for one year (June 2022 to 2023). Questions about views of AI in general, and in specific circumstances (e.g. bone fractures) were asked.
Results: One hundred and seventy-one eligible responses were received, with a mean age of 19 years (6-23 years) with representation across all 4 UK nations. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed they wanted to know the accuracy of an AI tool that was being used (122/171, 71.3%), that accuracy was more important than speed (113/171, 66.1%), and that AI should be used with human oversight (110/171, 64.3%). Many respondents (73/171, 42.7%) felt AI would be more accurate at finding problems on bone X-rays than humans, with almost all respondents who had sustained a missed fracture strongly agreeing with that sentiment (12/14, 85.7%).
Conclusions: Children and young people in our survey had positive views regarding AI, and felt it should be integrated into modern healthcare, but expressed a preference for a "medical professional in the loop" and accuracy of findings over speed. Key themes regarding information on AI performance and governance were raised and should be considered prior to future AI implementation for paediatric healthcare.
Clinical relevance statement: Artificial intelligence (AI) integration into clinical practice must consider all stakeholders, especially paediatric patients who have largely been ignored. Children and young people favour AI involvement with human oversight, seek assurances for safety, accuracy, and clear accountability in case of failures.
Key points: Paediatric patient's needs and voices are often overlooked in AI tool design and deployment. Children and young people approved of AI, if paired with human oversight and reliability. Children and young people are stakeholders for developing and deploying AI tools in paediatrics.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.