Effectiveness of narrowband ultraviolet B monotherapy versus combination therapy with systemic agents in patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides and the association with plaque lesions.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12623
Yao Qin, Yuwei Lin, Zhuojing Chen, Qiuli Zhang, Yingyi Li, Yujie Wen, Ping Tu, Pei Gao, Yang Wang
{"title":"Effectiveness of narrowband ultraviolet B monotherapy versus combination therapy with systemic agents in patients with early-stage mycosis fungoides and the association with plaque lesions.","authors":"Yao Qin, Yuwei Lin, Zhuojing Chen, Qiuli Zhang, Yingyi Li, Yujie Wen, Ping Tu, Pei Gao, Yang Wang","doi":"10.1111/jebm.12623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) has been recommended as first-line therapy for early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) in international guidelines. NB-UVB can be used as monotherapy or part of a multimodality treatment regimen. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness and optimal patients of NB-UVB in combination with systemic therapies in MF. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the combination versus NB-UVB monotherapy in early-stage MF and if plaque lesion status was related to these effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study included 247 early-stage MF patients who had received NB-UVB combined with systemic therapies vs. NB-UVB monotherapy from 2009 to 2021. The primary outcome was partial or complete response. Overall response rate and median time to response were calculated. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using the Cox model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 139 plaque-stage patients, the response rate for combination therapy group was higher than that of monotherapy group (79.0% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.006). The adjusted HR for combination therapy compared with NB-UVB monotherapy was 3.11 (95% CI 1.72-5.63). The combination therapy group also showed shorter time to response (4 vs. 6 months, p = 0.002). In 108 patch-stage patients, the response rate and time to response in two treatment groups showed no significant difference. There was therefore an observed interaction with patients' plaque lesion status for the effect size of NB-UVB combination therapy. No serious adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding systemic treatments to NB-UVB did not improve the treatment outcome of patch-stage patients, but it surpassed NB-UVB monotherapy for early-stage patients with plaques.</p>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) has been recommended as first-line therapy for early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) in international guidelines. NB-UVB can be used as monotherapy or part of a multimodality treatment regimen. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness and optimal patients of NB-UVB in combination with systemic therapies in MF. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the combination versus NB-UVB monotherapy in early-stage MF and if plaque lesion status was related to these effects.

Methods: This observational cohort study included 247 early-stage MF patients who had received NB-UVB combined with systemic therapies vs. NB-UVB monotherapy from 2009 to 2021. The primary outcome was partial or complete response. Overall response rate and median time to response were calculated. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using the Cox model.

Results: In 139 plaque-stage patients, the response rate for combination therapy group was higher than that of monotherapy group (79.0% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.006). The adjusted HR for combination therapy compared with NB-UVB monotherapy was 3.11 (95% CI 1.72-5.63). The combination therapy group also showed shorter time to response (4 vs. 6 months, p = 0.002). In 108 patch-stage patients, the response rate and time to response in two treatment groups showed no significant difference. There was therefore an observed interaction with patients' plaque lesion status for the effect size of NB-UVB combination therapy. No serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: Adding systemic treatments to NB-UVB did not improve the treatment outcome of patch-stage patients, but it surpassed NB-UVB monotherapy for early-stage patients with plaques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
窄带紫外线 B 单药治疗与全身用药联合治疗对早期真菌病患者的疗效以及与斑块病变的关系。
目的:窄带紫外线 B(NB-UVB)已被国际指南推荐为早期真菌病(MF)的一线疗法。窄带紫外线 B 可作为单一疗法使用,也可作为多模式治疗方案的一部分。关于 NB-UVB 与系统疗法联合治疗霉菌性真菌病的有效性和最佳患者的证据有限。我们旨在评估联合治疗与 NB-UVB 单药治疗对早期 MF 的疗效,以及斑块病变状态是否与这些疗效相关:这项观察性队列研究纳入了2009年至2021年期间接受NB-UVB联合系统疗法与NB-UVB单药治疗的247名早期MF患者。主要结果为部分或完全应答。计算总反应率和中位反应时间。使用 Cox 模型估算了危险比(HRs):在139例斑块期患者中,联合疗法组的应答率高于单一疗法组(79.0% vs. 54.3%,P = 0.006)。与 NB-UVB 单一疗法相比,联合疗法的调整 HR 为 3.11(95% CI 1.72-5.63)。联合疗法组的反应时间也更短(4 个月对 6 个月,P = 0.002)。在 108 例斑贴期患者中,两个治疗组的反应率和反应时间没有明显差异。因此,NB-UVB联合疗法的效果大小与患者的斑块病变状态存在相互作用。未观察到严重不良事件:结论:在NB-UVB基础上增加全身治疗并不能改善斑块期患者的治疗效果,但对于早期斑块期患者来说,其效果优于NB-UVB单药治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
期刊最新文献
Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence. A computable biomedical knowledge system: Toward rapidly building candidate-directed acyclic graphs. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among adults living with HIV in the eastern coast of Tanzania: A nested cross-sectional study. Real-world experience of Fuzheng Yiqing granule as chemoprophylaxis against COVID-19 infection among close contacts: A prospective cohort study. Reconciling conflicting evidence in the evaluation of the MitraClip system: Assessment of and response to the MITRA-FR and COAPT trials by key stakeholders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1