Exploring Smartphone App Use in Older Adults with a Chronic Respiratory Disease: The biggest Problem I have Is I Don't Understand My Phone At All.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiration Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1159/000539874
Fiona Coll, Isis Grigoletto, Vinicius Cavalheri, Jaimie-Lee Smith, Scott Claxton, Sheldon Wulff, Kylie Hill
{"title":"Exploring Smartphone App Use in Older Adults with a Chronic Respiratory Disease: The biggest Problem I have Is I Don't Understand My Phone At All.","authors":"Fiona Coll, Isis Grigoletto, Vinicius Cavalheri, Jaimie-Lee Smith, Scott Claxton, Sheldon Wulff, Kylie Hill","doi":"10.1159/000539874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In older people with a chronic respiratory disease, we explored (i) usual Smartphone application (App) use, (ii) the time taken to download and use an App, and (iii) changes in self-efficacy for downloading an App after a single practice session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were invited to attend one or two separate assessment sessions (Part A and B). Those who attended Part A had data pertaining to their App usage over the previous week extracted from their Smartphone. Those who attended Part B were asked to download and use a pedometer App and \"think out loud\" during the task. Before and after the task, participants rated their self-efficacy for downloading an App using a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants (mean ± SD 74 ± 5 years) completed Part A. Commonly used Apps related to communication (e.g., texting; median [interquartile range] 15 [9-25] min/day) and interest (e.g., news; 14 [4-50] min/day). Fifteen participants completed Part B (mean ± SD 73 ± 7 years). The median time taken to download and use the App was 24 (22-37) min. The \"think out loud\" data converged into four domains: (i) low self-efficacy for using and learning Apps; (ii) reliance on others for help; (iii) unpleasant emotional responses; and (iv) challenges due to changes associated with longevity. Self-efficacy increased by 4 (95% confidence interval: 3-6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This population used Apps mainly to facilitate social connection. It took participants almost half an hour to download and use an App, but a single practice session improved self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In older people with a chronic respiratory disease, we explored (i) usual Smartphone application (App) use, (ii) the time taken to download and use an App, and (iii) changes in self-efficacy for downloading an App after a single practice session.

Methods: Participants were invited to attend one or two separate assessment sessions (Part A and B). Those who attended Part A had data pertaining to their App usage over the previous week extracted from their Smartphone. Those who attended Part B were asked to download and use a pedometer App and "think out loud" during the task. Before and after the task, participants rated their self-efficacy for downloading an App using a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10).

Results: Twenty-seven participants (mean ± SD 74 ± 5 years) completed Part A. Commonly used Apps related to communication (e.g., texting; median [interquartile range] 15 [9-25] min/day) and interest (e.g., news; 14 [4-50] min/day). Fifteen participants completed Part B (mean ± SD 73 ± 7 years). The median time taken to download and use the App was 24 (22-37) min. The "think out loud" data converged into four domains: (i) low self-efficacy for using and learning Apps; (ii) reliance on others for help; (iii) unpleasant emotional responses; and (iv) challenges due to changes associated with longevity. Self-efficacy increased by 4 (95% confidence interval: 3-6).

Conclusion: This population used Apps mainly to facilitate social connection. It took participants almost half an hour to download and use an App, but a single practice session improved self-efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索患有慢性呼吸系统疾病的老年人使用智能手机应用程序的情况:我最大的问题是我完全不了解我的手机。
简介在患有慢性呼吸系统疾病的老年人中,我们探讨了:(i) 通常使用智能手机应用程序(App)的情况;(ii) 下载和使用应用程序所需的时间;(iii) 在单次练习后下载应用程序的自我效能感的变化:受试者被邀请参加一个或两个独立的评估环节(A 部分和 B 部分)。参加 A 部分的参与者将从其智能手机中提取有关其前一周使用应用程序的数据。参加 B 部分的参与者被要求下载并使用计步器应用程序,并在任务过程中 "大声思考"。在完成任务前后,参与者使用视觉模拟量表(0-10)对其下载应用程序的自我效能进行评分:27名参与者(平均±SD为74±5岁)完成了A部分。常用的应用程序与交流(如发短信;中位数[四分位数间距]为15[9至25]分钟/天)和兴趣(如新闻;14[4至50]分钟/天)有关。15名参与者完成了B部分(平均±SD为73±7岁)。下载和使用应用程序的时间中位数为 24 [22 到 37] 分钟。大声想一想 "的数据集中在四个领域:(i) 使用和学习应用程序的自我效能低;(ii) 依赖他人帮助;(iii) 不愉快的情绪反应;(iv) 与长寿相关的变化带来的挑战。自我效能感增加了 4(95% CI 3 至 6):该人群使用应用程序主要是为了促进社交联系。参与者花了近半个小时下载和使用应用程序,但一次练习就提高了自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
期刊最新文献
Poor correlation between diaphragm ultrasound and invasive gold standard technique derived respiratory muscle strength assessment in patients after hospitalization for COVID-19. A multidimensional approach to the management of patients in prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation - the concept of treatable traits - a narrative review. Successful endobronchial valve placement in the treatment of persistent bronchopleural fistula and empyema allows the avoidance of right completion pneumonectomy. A High-Intensity versus Moderate-Intensity exercise training program in Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-related COPD (IMAC): a randomized, controlled trial. Mastery Learning Guided by Artificial Intelligence Is Superior to Directed Self-Regulated Learning in Flexible Bronchoscopy Training: An RCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1