Prospective Pilot Study: Tolerability of Outpatient Penile Plication Under Nursing-Administered Conscious Sedation vs Anesthesiologist-Administered Deep Sedation.

IF 1.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000588
Dhiraj S Bal, Maximilian Fidel, Jainik Shah, Matthew Urichuk, Karim Sidhom, Alagarsamy Pandian, Robert Bard, Premal Patel
{"title":"Prospective Pilot Study: Tolerability of Outpatient Penile Plication Under Nursing-Administered Conscious Sedation vs Anesthesiologist-Administered Deep Sedation.","authors":"Dhiraj S Bal, Maximilian Fidel, Jainik Shah, Matthew Urichuk, Karim Sidhom, Alagarsamy Pandian, Robert Bard, Premal Patel","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Penile plication is commonly performed for Peyronie's disease under general or spinal anesthesia. Conscious sedation (CS) offers decreased anesthetic risks, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to perform the procedure in outpatient settings with shorter wait times. We sought to compare tolerability of penile plication under deep intravenous sedation (DIS) administered by anesthesiologists and nursing-administered CS (NACS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tolerability for penile plication was prospectively evaluated, excluding revision surgeries and those with hourglass or hinge deformities. DIS included midazolam and ketamine with infusion of propofol and remifentanil. NACS consisted of midazolam and fentanyl. Baseline characteristics, procedural information, and patient- and surgeon-reported pain assessments were collected. Patients were administered a standardized tolerability questionnaire on follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were enrolled (23 DIS; 17 NACS) with similar baseline characteristics. Median curvature of the DIS cohort was 55° (interquartile range = 43.75-76.25) and 45° (interquartile range = 45-60) in NACS. There was a 100% success rate with no procedure abortion or conversion to general anesthetic. On follow-up, all patients had functional curvature (<20°), and 100% of patients in the DIS and NACS cohorts reported that they would recommend CS to others. Over 93% of patients in both cohorts would choose CS over general anesthetic in the future, with no differences in perioperative and postoperative pain between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Penile plication with CS, whether administered by an anesthesiologist or nursing, is well tolerated with no differences in pain or complications. This indicates that outpatient penile plication with trained nursing staff administering CS can safely reduce costs, risks, and wait times.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":"11 4","pages":"662-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Penile plication is commonly performed for Peyronie's disease under general or spinal anesthesia. Conscious sedation (CS) offers decreased anesthetic risks, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to perform the procedure in outpatient settings with shorter wait times. We sought to compare tolerability of penile plication under deep intravenous sedation (DIS) administered by anesthesiologists and nursing-administered CS (NACS).

Methods: Tolerability for penile plication was prospectively evaluated, excluding revision surgeries and those with hourglass or hinge deformities. DIS included midazolam and ketamine with infusion of propofol and remifentanil. NACS consisted of midazolam and fentanyl. Baseline characteristics, procedural information, and patient- and surgeon-reported pain assessments were collected. Patients were administered a standardized tolerability questionnaire on follow-up.

Results: Forty patients were enrolled (23 DIS; 17 NACS) with similar baseline characteristics. Median curvature of the DIS cohort was 55° (interquartile range = 43.75-76.25) and 45° (interquartile range = 45-60) in NACS. There was a 100% success rate with no procedure abortion or conversion to general anesthetic. On follow-up, all patients had functional curvature (<20°), and 100% of patients in the DIS and NACS cohorts reported that they would recommend CS to others. Over 93% of patients in both cohorts would choose CS over general anesthetic in the future, with no differences in perioperative and postoperative pain between groups.

Conclusions: Penile plication with CS, whether administered by an anesthesiologist or nursing, is well tolerated with no differences in pain or complications. This indicates that outpatient penile plication with trained nursing staff administering CS can safely reduce costs, risks, and wait times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前瞻性试点研究:门诊患者阴茎套扎术在护理人员管理的清醒镇静与麻醉师管理的深度镇静下的耐受性对比。
介绍:阴茎成形术通常在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下进行,用于治疗佩罗尼氏病。意识镇静(CS)可降低麻醉风险,提高成本效益,并能在门诊环境中进行手术,缩短等待时间。我们试图比较在麻醉师实施的深静脉镇静(DIS)和护理人员实施的CS(NACS)下进行阴茎电切术的耐受性:对阴茎电切术的耐受性进行了前瞻性评估,不包括翻修手术和有沙漏或铰链畸形的手术。DIS包括咪达唑仑和氯胺酮,同时输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼。NACS 包括咪达唑仑和芬太尼。收集了基线特征、手术信息以及患者和外科医生报告的疼痛评估。随访时对患者进行了标准化耐受性问卷调查:40名患者(23名DIS患者;17名NACS患者)的基线特征相似。DIS患者的中位曲率为55°(四分位数间距=43.75-76.25),NACS患者的中位曲率为45°(四分位数间距=45-60)。手术成功率为 100%,无手术流产或转为全身麻醉。随访结果显示,所有患者的阴茎都有功能性弯曲(结论:使用 CS 进行阴茎电切术,无论是由麻醉师还是护士操作,患者都能很好地耐受,疼痛或并发症方面没有差异。这表明,由训练有素的护理人员实施 CS 的门诊阴茎电切术可以安全地降低成本、风险和等待时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Application of Machine Learning to Predict Symptomatic Recurrence Events for Patients With Kidney Stone. Practice Trends in OnabotulinumtoxinA and Augmentation Cystoplasty: Implications for Adult and Pediatric Urology. Comparative Analysis of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Prostate Imaging After Focal Ablation Scoring Systems in the Postfocal Therapy Assessment of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Trends in Prolapse Repair Approaches Before and After Ban of Transvaginal Mesh. Disparities in Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality in Incarcerated vs Nonincarcerated Patients in Michigan: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1